The consensus model for regulation of APRNs

Implications for nurse practitioners

Linda Rounds, Jolene J. Zych, Laura L. Mallary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation as a proposed solution to simplify and unify regulation of advanced nursing practice with respect to licensure, certification, accreditation, and educational standards. Data sources: Policy statements and reports issued by national organizations of nursing professionals and discussion within the scholarly literature provided an overview of regulatory differences among the 50 U.S. states, their impacts on advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice, and discussion of the Consensus Model as a potential solution. Conclusions: Major organizations of nursing professionals have endorsed the Consensus Model, indicating the importance of this significant step toward standards and consistent quality in APRN education and practice. Diverse regulatory criteria, such as variable accreditation standards, disparate certification and licensing requirements, inconsistent population foci, and scopes of practice, represent barriers to optimized APRN function within today's complex healthcare system and, ultimately, reduced access to safe, quality care for patients. Implications for practice: The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation promises to unify APRN education, practice, and licensure, promoting greater mobility among nursing professionals. Elimination of inconsistencies in APRN licensure, education, certification, and accreditation requirements will promote greater value and mobility for the APRN within the healthcare system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Nurses
Licensure
Accreditation
Certification
Nursing
Education
Advanced Practice Nursing
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval

Keywords

  • APRN Consensus Model
  • Education
  • Nurse practitioners
  • Policy
  • Professional organizations
  • Regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The consensus model for regulation of APRNs : Implications for nurse practitioners. / Rounds, Linda; Zych, Jolene J.; Mallary, Laura L.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Vol. 25, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{126d3ca910254b2e802f93a7dde1a90e,
title = "The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation as a proposed solution to simplify and unify regulation of advanced nursing practice with respect to licensure, certification, accreditation, and educational standards. Data sources: Policy statements and reports issued by national organizations of nursing professionals and discussion within the scholarly literature provided an overview of regulatory differences among the 50 U.S. states, their impacts on advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice, and discussion of the Consensus Model as a potential solution. Conclusions: Major organizations of nursing professionals have endorsed the Consensus Model, indicating the importance of this significant step toward standards and consistent quality in APRN education and practice. Diverse regulatory criteria, such as variable accreditation standards, disparate certification and licensing requirements, inconsistent population foci, and scopes of practice, represent barriers to optimized APRN function within today's complex healthcare system and, ultimately, reduced access to safe, quality care for patients. Implications for practice: The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation promises to unify APRN education, practice, and licensure, promoting greater mobility among nursing professionals. Elimination of inconsistencies in APRN licensure, education, certification, and accreditation requirements will promote greater value and mobility for the APRN within the healthcare system.",
keywords = "APRN Consensus Model, Education, Nurse practitioners, Policy, Professional organizations, Regulation",
author = "Linda Rounds and Zych, {Jolene J.} and Mallary, {Laura L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-7599.2013.00812.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners",
issn = "1041-2972",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The consensus model for regulation of APRNs

T2 - Implications for nurse practitioners

AU - Rounds, Linda

AU - Zych, Jolene J.

AU - Mallary, Laura L.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: To examine the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation as a proposed solution to simplify and unify regulation of advanced nursing practice with respect to licensure, certification, accreditation, and educational standards. Data sources: Policy statements and reports issued by national organizations of nursing professionals and discussion within the scholarly literature provided an overview of regulatory differences among the 50 U.S. states, their impacts on advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice, and discussion of the Consensus Model as a potential solution. Conclusions: Major organizations of nursing professionals have endorsed the Consensus Model, indicating the importance of this significant step toward standards and consistent quality in APRN education and practice. Diverse regulatory criteria, such as variable accreditation standards, disparate certification and licensing requirements, inconsistent population foci, and scopes of practice, represent barriers to optimized APRN function within today's complex healthcare system and, ultimately, reduced access to safe, quality care for patients. Implications for practice: The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation promises to unify APRN education, practice, and licensure, promoting greater mobility among nursing professionals. Elimination of inconsistencies in APRN licensure, education, certification, and accreditation requirements will promote greater value and mobility for the APRN within the healthcare system.

AB - Purpose: To examine the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation as a proposed solution to simplify and unify regulation of advanced nursing practice with respect to licensure, certification, accreditation, and educational standards. Data sources: Policy statements and reports issued by national organizations of nursing professionals and discussion within the scholarly literature provided an overview of regulatory differences among the 50 U.S. states, their impacts on advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice, and discussion of the Consensus Model as a potential solution. Conclusions: Major organizations of nursing professionals have endorsed the Consensus Model, indicating the importance of this significant step toward standards and consistent quality in APRN education and practice. Diverse regulatory criteria, such as variable accreditation standards, disparate certification and licensing requirements, inconsistent population foci, and scopes of practice, represent barriers to optimized APRN function within today's complex healthcare system and, ultimately, reduced access to safe, quality care for patients. Implications for practice: The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation promises to unify APRN education, practice, and licensure, promoting greater mobility among nursing professionals. Elimination of inconsistencies in APRN licensure, education, certification, and accreditation requirements will promote greater value and mobility for the APRN within the healthcare system.

KW - APRN Consensus Model

KW - Education

KW - Nurse practitioners

KW - Policy

KW - Professional organizations

KW - Regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875781300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875781300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2013.00812.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2013.00812.x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

SN - 1041-2972

IS - 4

ER -