The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts

Richard E. Coggeshall, Kyungsoon Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nucleolar counts are the method of choice for determining neuronal numbers. The main problem is the determination of an accurate correction factor for split nucleoli. The difficulties are that small nucleolar fragments are often unrecognizable and that nucleoli may be pushed or rolled rather than cleanly cut by the knife. A widely used method uses an estimate to account for the difficulties, and almost all methods depend on measurements of such things as section thickness and nucleolar diameters. We differ from previous procedures by identifying neurons first and then determining whether the nucleolus in each identified neuron is split or whole. If N is the true number of neurons, n the number of nucleoli counted to estimate N, T the number of nucleoli counted for the correction factor and S the number of nucleoli in T that are split, then N = [(T-S/2)/T]× n. The advantages are that the observations are easily done and that there are no estimates, only a determination of the numbers of whole and split nucleoli for a sample population of neurons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-155
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Neurons
Population

Keywords

  • neuronal counts
  • nucleoli
  • spinal ganglia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts. / Coggeshall, Richard E.; Chung, Kyungsoon.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1984, p. 149-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd4675553f994340ae9c4a9c89aedd90,
title = "The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts",
abstract = "Nucleolar counts are the method of choice for determining neuronal numbers. The main problem is the determination of an accurate correction factor for split nucleoli. The difficulties are that small nucleolar fragments are often unrecognizable and that nucleoli may be pushed or rolled rather than cleanly cut by the knife. A widely used method uses an estimate to account for the difficulties, and almost all methods depend on measurements of such things as section thickness and nucleolar diameters. We differ from previous procedures by identifying neurons first and then determining whether the nucleolus in each identified neuron is split or whole. If N is the true number of neurons, n the number of nucleoli counted to estimate N, T the number of nucleoli counted for the correction factor and S the number of nucleoli in T that are split, then N = [(T-S/2)/T]× n. The advantages are that the observations are easily done and that there are no estimates, only a determination of the numbers of whole and split nucleoli for a sample population of neurons.",
keywords = "neuronal counts, nucleoli, spinal ganglia",
author = "Coggeshall, {Richard E.} and Kyungsoon Chung",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0165-0270(84)90069-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "149--155",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts

AU - Coggeshall, Richard E.

AU - Chung, Kyungsoon

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Nucleolar counts are the method of choice for determining neuronal numbers. The main problem is the determination of an accurate correction factor for split nucleoli. The difficulties are that small nucleolar fragments are often unrecognizable and that nucleoli may be pushed or rolled rather than cleanly cut by the knife. A widely used method uses an estimate to account for the difficulties, and almost all methods depend on measurements of such things as section thickness and nucleolar diameters. We differ from previous procedures by identifying neurons first and then determining whether the nucleolus in each identified neuron is split or whole. If N is the true number of neurons, n the number of nucleoli counted to estimate N, T the number of nucleoli counted for the correction factor and S the number of nucleoli in T that are split, then N = [(T-S/2)/T]× n. The advantages are that the observations are easily done and that there are no estimates, only a determination of the numbers of whole and split nucleoli for a sample population of neurons.

AB - Nucleolar counts are the method of choice for determining neuronal numbers. The main problem is the determination of an accurate correction factor for split nucleoli. The difficulties are that small nucleolar fragments are often unrecognizable and that nucleoli may be pushed or rolled rather than cleanly cut by the knife. A widely used method uses an estimate to account for the difficulties, and almost all methods depend on measurements of such things as section thickness and nucleolar diameters. We differ from previous procedures by identifying neurons first and then determining whether the nucleolus in each identified neuron is split or whole. If N is the true number of neurons, n the number of nucleoli counted to estimate N, T the number of nucleoli counted for the correction factor and S the number of nucleoli in T that are split, then N = [(T-S/2)/T]× n. The advantages are that the observations are easily done and that there are no estimates, only a determination of the numbers of whole and split nucleoli for a sample population of neurons.

KW - neuronal counts

KW - nucleoli

KW - spinal ganglia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021339695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021339695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90069-4

DO - 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90069-4

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 149

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

IS - 2

ER -