The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal fold thickness

Gayle Olson, George Saade, Marya Zlatnik, Gary A. Dildy, Michael Belfort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether ultrasonographic measurements of nuchal fold thickness are affected by the position of the fetal neck. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal nuchal fold thickness was prospectively measured in 258 women undergoing routine ultrasonography at 15 to 21 completed weeks of gestation. Patients with fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies were excluded. At the time of examination the position of the fetal head was noted as being extended or flexed on the basis of the angle between the spine and the base of the skull. Gestational age was based on menstrual dates or ultrasonographic biometric parameters. Data were tested for normality. Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of covariance were used (significance was considered to be P < .05). Data are presented as median and range. RESULTS: A total of 258 fetuses were examined with 167 (65%) in the flexed and 91 (35%) in the extended neck position. Gestational age was not significantly different between the flexed and extended groups (median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.5-21.6 weeks; vs median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.6-22 weeks; P = .23). Nuchal fold thickness was significantly lower in the flexed group than in the extended group (median, 3.5 mm; range, 1.3-6.2 mm; vs median, 3.9 mm; range, 2.2-4.9 mm; P = .0097). Nuchal fold thickness increased significantly with gestational age in both groups. The difference in nuchal fold thickness between the 2 groups persisted even after the increase in nuchal fold thickness was adjusted for with gestational age (P = .002, analysis of covariance). The difference between the 2 groups was higher at earlier gestations. CONCLUSION: Nuchal fold thickness is affected by gestational age and fetal neck position. Correction for these variables may improve the accuracy of nuchal fold thickness measurements in screening for fetal chromosomal anomalies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)995-997
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume183
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Nuchal Translucency Measurement
Neck
Gestational Age
Pyridinolcarbamate
Pregnancy
Skull Base
Nonparametric Statistics
Ultrasonography
Spine
Fetus
Head

Keywords

  • Aneuploidy
  • Nuchal fold
  • Second trimester

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal fold thickness. / Olson, Gayle; Saade, George; Zlatnik, Marya; Dildy, Gary A.; Belfort, Michael.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 183, No. 4, 2000, p. 995-997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olson, Gayle ; Saade, George ; Zlatnik, Marya ; Dildy, Gary A. ; Belfort, Michael. / The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal fold thickness. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 ; Vol. 183, No. 4. pp. 995-997.
@article{ec4f1841c4a94ffb84832b4d186031ea,
title = "The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal fold thickness",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether ultrasonographic measurements of nuchal fold thickness are affected by the position of the fetal neck. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal nuchal fold thickness was prospectively measured in 258 women undergoing routine ultrasonography at 15 to 21 completed weeks of gestation. Patients with fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies were excluded. At the time of examination the position of the fetal head was noted as being extended or flexed on the basis of the angle between the spine and the base of the skull. Gestational age was based on menstrual dates or ultrasonographic biometric parameters. Data were tested for normality. Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of covariance were used (significance was considered to be P < .05). Data are presented as median and range. RESULTS: A total of 258 fetuses were examined with 167 (65{\%}) in the flexed and 91 (35{\%}) in the extended neck position. Gestational age was not significantly different between the flexed and extended groups (median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.5-21.6 weeks; vs median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.6-22 weeks; P = .23). Nuchal fold thickness was significantly lower in the flexed group than in the extended group (median, 3.5 mm; range, 1.3-6.2 mm; vs median, 3.9 mm; range, 2.2-4.9 mm; P = .0097). Nuchal fold thickness increased significantly with gestational age in both groups. The difference in nuchal fold thickness between the 2 groups persisted even after the increase in nuchal fold thickness was adjusted for with gestational age (P = .002, analysis of covariance). The difference between the 2 groups was higher at earlier gestations. CONCLUSION: Nuchal fold thickness is affected by gestational age and fetal neck position. Correction for these variables may improve the accuracy of nuchal fold thickness measurements in screening for fetal chromosomal anomalies.",
keywords = "Aneuploidy, Nuchal fold, Second trimester",
author = "Gayle Olson and George Saade and Marya Zlatnik and Dildy, {Gary A.} and Michael Belfort",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1067/mob.2000.106768",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "995--997",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal fold thickness

AU - Olson, Gayle

AU - Saade, George

AU - Zlatnik, Marya

AU - Dildy, Gary A.

AU - Belfort, Michael

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether ultrasonographic measurements of nuchal fold thickness are affected by the position of the fetal neck. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal nuchal fold thickness was prospectively measured in 258 women undergoing routine ultrasonography at 15 to 21 completed weeks of gestation. Patients with fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies were excluded. At the time of examination the position of the fetal head was noted as being extended or flexed on the basis of the angle between the spine and the base of the skull. Gestational age was based on menstrual dates or ultrasonographic biometric parameters. Data were tested for normality. Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of covariance were used (significance was considered to be P < .05). Data are presented as median and range. RESULTS: A total of 258 fetuses were examined with 167 (65%) in the flexed and 91 (35%) in the extended neck position. Gestational age was not significantly different between the flexed and extended groups (median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.5-21.6 weeks; vs median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.6-22 weeks; P = .23). Nuchal fold thickness was significantly lower in the flexed group than in the extended group (median, 3.5 mm; range, 1.3-6.2 mm; vs median, 3.9 mm; range, 2.2-4.9 mm; P = .0097). Nuchal fold thickness increased significantly with gestational age in both groups. The difference in nuchal fold thickness between the 2 groups persisted even after the increase in nuchal fold thickness was adjusted for with gestational age (P = .002, analysis of covariance). The difference between the 2 groups was higher at earlier gestations. CONCLUSION: Nuchal fold thickness is affected by gestational age and fetal neck position. Correction for these variables may improve the accuracy of nuchal fold thickness measurements in screening for fetal chromosomal anomalies.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether ultrasonographic measurements of nuchal fold thickness are affected by the position of the fetal neck. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal nuchal fold thickness was prospectively measured in 258 women undergoing routine ultrasonography at 15 to 21 completed weeks of gestation. Patients with fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies were excluded. At the time of examination the position of the fetal head was noted as being extended or flexed on the basis of the angle between the spine and the base of the skull. Gestational age was based on menstrual dates or ultrasonographic biometric parameters. Data were tested for normality. Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of covariance were used (significance was considered to be P < .05). Data are presented as median and range. RESULTS: A total of 258 fetuses were examined with 167 (65%) in the flexed and 91 (35%) in the extended neck position. Gestational age was not significantly different between the flexed and extended groups (median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.5-21.6 weeks; vs median, 19.1 weeks; range, 15.6-22 weeks; P = .23). Nuchal fold thickness was significantly lower in the flexed group than in the extended group (median, 3.5 mm; range, 1.3-6.2 mm; vs median, 3.9 mm; range, 2.2-4.9 mm; P = .0097). Nuchal fold thickness increased significantly with gestational age in both groups. The difference in nuchal fold thickness between the 2 groups persisted even after the increase in nuchal fold thickness was adjusted for with gestational age (P = .002, analysis of covariance). The difference between the 2 groups was higher at earlier gestations. CONCLUSION: Nuchal fold thickness is affected by gestational age and fetal neck position. Correction for these variables may improve the accuracy of nuchal fold thickness measurements in screening for fetal chromosomal anomalies.

KW - Aneuploidy

KW - Nuchal fold

KW - Second trimester

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033788651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033788651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mob.2000.106768

DO - 10.1067/mob.2000.106768

M3 - Article

C2 - 11035352

AN - SCOPUS:0033788651

VL - 183

SP - 995

EP - 997

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -