The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

R. T. Scott, Russell Snyder, D. M. Strickland, C. C. Tyburski, J. A. Bagnall, K. R. Reed, C. A. Adair, S. B. Hensley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (± standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 ± 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of 'in' or 'out' of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)888-892
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume50
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Luteal Phase
Histology
Biopsy
Menstruation
Endometrium
Research Personnel
Pathologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Scott, R. T., Snyder, R., Strickland, D. M., Tyburski, C. C., Bagnall, J. A., Reed, K. R., ... Hensley, S. B. (1988). The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertility and Sterility, 50(6), 888-892.

The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. / Scott, R. T.; Snyder, Russell; Strickland, D. M.; Tyburski, C. C.; Bagnall, J. A.; Reed, K. R.; Adair, C. A.; Hensley, S. B.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 50, No. 6, 1988, p. 888-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, RT, Snyder, R, Strickland, DM, Tyburski, CC, Bagnall, JA, Reed, KR, Adair, CA & Hensley, SB 1988, 'The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects', Fertility and Sterility, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 888-892.
Scott, R. T. ; Snyder, Russell ; Strickland, D. M. ; Tyburski, C. C. ; Bagnall, J. A. ; Reed, K. R. ; Adair, C. A. ; Hensley, S. B. / The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. In: Fertility and Sterility. 1988 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 888-892.
@article{814a7ee9991a456c91def18e5a1e829a,
title = "The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects",
abstract = "Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (± standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 ± 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of 'in' or 'out' of phase in 22{\%} of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22{\%} to 39{\%} depending on the clinical setting.",
author = "Scott, {R. T.} and Russell Snyder and Strickland, {D. M.} and Tyburski, {C. C.} and Bagnall, {J. A.} and Reed, {K. R.} and Adair, {C. A.} and Hensley, {S. B.}",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "888--892",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

AU - Scott, R. T.

AU - Snyder, Russell

AU - Strickland, D. M.

AU - Tyburski, C. C.

AU - Bagnall, J. A.

AU - Reed, K. R.

AU - Adair, C. A.

AU - Hensley, S. B.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (± standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 ± 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of 'in' or 'out' of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.

AB - Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (± standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 ± 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of 'in' or 'out' of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024210478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024210478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 888

EP - 892

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 6

ER -