TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of extracellular matrix rigidity on 3-dimensional cultures of amnion membrane cells
AU - Richardson, Lauren S.
AU - Menon, Poorna R.
AU - Menon, Ramkumar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1/15
Y1 - 2020/1/15
N2 - Introduction: To determine 3D growth of amnion membrane cells using soft substrate plates of various rigidities. Methods: Amnion epithelial (AEC) and mesenchymal cells (AMC) were cultured on 6-well soft substrate plates coated with matrigel and elastomer with rigidities of 0.5, 2, 8, 16, and 64 kPa (n = 3 each). Controls were cells in standard culture conditions. Cell morphology, spheroids' and sheets’ formations and viability (bright field microscopy and crystal violet staining), and cellular transitions (vimentin/cytokeratin-18 [CK-18] ratios) were analyzed. A Student t-test was used for statistical analyses. Results: AECs in substrate rigidities between 2 and 8 kPa formed 3D features (spheroids and sheets) while retaining viability. Two kPa produced spheroids with epithelial characteristics (decrease in vimentin), and 8 kPa favored sheets. Transplantation and culture of AEC sheets with no matrix or elastomers, retained AECs’ viability and maintained their epithelial characteristics. Optimum AMC growth was also between 2 and 8 kP A, with predominance of vimentin; however, AMCs did not form 3D structures. Lower and higher rigidities transitioned AMCs into AECs (decrease in vimentin). Discussion: Matrix rigidities between 2 and 8 kPa produced 3D structures of AECs (spheroids and sheets), resembling amnion membranes’ morphology and exhibiting regenerative capacity in utero. Although AMCs grew in similar rigidities, a lack of 3D structures support their dispersed character in the membrane matrix. Extreme rigidities transitioned AMCs into AECs, suggesting that AMCs are transient cells (reservoirs) in the matrix required for remodeling. Compromises in matrix rigidity can cause membrane dysfunction and lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes.
AB - Introduction: To determine 3D growth of amnion membrane cells using soft substrate plates of various rigidities. Methods: Amnion epithelial (AEC) and mesenchymal cells (AMC) were cultured on 6-well soft substrate plates coated with matrigel and elastomer with rigidities of 0.5, 2, 8, 16, and 64 kPa (n = 3 each). Controls were cells in standard culture conditions. Cell morphology, spheroids' and sheets’ formations and viability (bright field microscopy and crystal violet staining), and cellular transitions (vimentin/cytokeratin-18 [CK-18] ratios) were analyzed. A Student t-test was used for statistical analyses. Results: AECs in substrate rigidities between 2 and 8 kPa formed 3D features (spheroids and sheets) while retaining viability. Two kPa produced spheroids with epithelial characteristics (decrease in vimentin), and 8 kPa favored sheets. Transplantation and culture of AEC sheets with no matrix or elastomers, retained AECs’ viability and maintained their epithelial characteristics. Optimum AMC growth was also between 2 and 8 kP A, with predominance of vimentin; however, AMCs did not form 3D structures. Lower and higher rigidities transitioned AMCs into AECs (decrease in vimentin). Discussion: Matrix rigidities between 2 and 8 kPa produced 3D structures of AECs (spheroids and sheets), resembling amnion membranes’ morphology and exhibiting regenerative capacity in utero. Although AMCs grew in similar rigidities, a lack of 3D structures support their dispersed character in the membrane matrix. Extreme rigidities transitioned AMCs into AECs, suggesting that AMCs are transient cells (reservoirs) in the matrix required for remodeling. Compromises in matrix rigidity can cause membrane dysfunction and lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes.
KW - 3D formations
KW - Amnion epithelial cells
KW - Amnion membranes
KW - Amnion mesenchymal cells
KW - Cellular transitions
KW - Matrix rigidity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076407059&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076407059&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.12.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 32056556
AN - SCOPUS:85076407059
SN - 0143-4004
VL - 90
SP - 82
EP - 89
JO - Placenta
JF - Placenta
ER -