The Effects of Timing of Ankle Blocks in Forefoot, Midfoot, or Hindfoot Reconstruction With the Use of an Ankle Tourniquet

James Gwosdz, Lattisha Bilbrew, Daniel Jupiter, Vinod Panchbhavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Ankle blocks are used in the ambulatory surgery setting to control postoperative pain, which is often worst in the first 24 hours after surgery. We conducted a trial to determine whether the timing of ankle block administration in relation to ankle tourniquet inflation has an effect on perceived pain and narcotic consumption. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted between August 2015 and January 2016. Patients were assigned to three groups. In group A, an ankle block was performed before ankle tourniquet inflation; in group B, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation; and in group C, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation with additional local anesthetic placed around the incision at the end of the procedure. Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, which was recorded at discharge, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 2 weeks after surgery. Narcotic consumption was recorded at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results. The only statistically significant difference in mean VAS scores occurred at 24 hours, when patients who received an ankle block after tourniquet inflation with local incisional anesthetic at closure (group C) had a mean VAS score 2.8 points lower (3.5 vs 6.3; P =.025) than those who received only an ankle block after tourniquet inflation (group B). There was no difference in narcotic consumption between groups at 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. The timing of ankle block in relation to tourniquet inflation did not have an effect on pain control in forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot reconstruction. The synergistic effect of an ankle block with additional incisional anesthetic at closure, is more effective than ankle block alone and is the ideal combination for postoperative pain control in foot surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-533
Number of pages7
JournalFoot and Ankle Specialist
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tourniquets
Ankle
Economic Inflation
Narcotics
Visual Analog Scale
Postoperative Pain
Local Anesthetics
Pain
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Anesthetics
Foot

Keywords

  • complex foot and ankle conditions
  • general disorders
  • heel and arch pain
  • pain in the ball of the feet
  • pain management
  • pharmacologic pain management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Podiatry
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The Effects of Timing of Ankle Blocks in Forefoot, Midfoot, or Hindfoot Reconstruction With the Use of an Ankle Tourniquet. / Gwosdz, James; Bilbrew, Lattisha; Jupiter, Daniel; Panchbhavi, Vinod.

In: Foot and Ankle Specialist, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 527-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be85d441ea994e488a038d538f5855c4,
title = "The Effects of Timing of Ankle Blocks in Forefoot, Midfoot, or Hindfoot Reconstruction With the Use of an Ankle Tourniquet",
abstract = "Background. Ankle blocks are used in the ambulatory surgery setting to control postoperative pain, which is often worst in the first 24 hours after surgery. We conducted a trial to determine whether the timing of ankle block administration in relation to ankle tourniquet inflation has an effect on perceived pain and narcotic consumption. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted between August 2015 and January 2016. Patients were assigned to three groups. In group A, an ankle block was performed before ankle tourniquet inflation; in group B, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation; and in group C, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation with additional local anesthetic placed around the incision at the end of the procedure. Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, which was recorded at discharge, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 2 weeks after surgery. Narcotic consumption was recorded at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results. The only statistically significant difference in mean VAS scores occurred at 24 hours, when patients who received an ankle block after tourniquet inflation with local incisional anesthetic at closure (group C) had a mean VAS score 2.8 points lower (3.5 vs 6.3; P =.025) than those who received only an ankle block after tourniquet inflation (group B). There was no difference in narcotic consumption between groups at 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. The timing of ankle block in relation to tourniquet inflation did not have an effect on pain control in forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot reconstruction. The synergistic effect of an ankle block with additional incisional anesthetic at closure, is more effective than ankle block alone and is the ideal combination for postoperative pain control in foot surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.",
keywords = "complex foot and ankle conditions, general disorders, heel and arch pain, pain in the ball of the feet, pain management, pharmacologic pain management",
author = "James Gwosdz and Lattisha Bilbrew and Daniel Jupiter and Vinod Panchbhavi",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1938640017754233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "527--533",
journal = "Foot & ankle specialist",
issn = "1938-6400",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Timing of Ankle Blocks in Forefoot, Midfoot, or Hindfoot Reconstruction With the Use of an Ankle Tourniquet

AU - Gwosdz, James

AU - Bilbrew, Lattisha

AU - Jupiter, Daniel

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Background. Ankle blocks are used in the ambulatory surgery setting to control postoperative pain, which is often worst in the first 24 hours after surgery. We conducted a trial to determine whether the timing of ankle block administration in relation to ankle tourniquet inflation has an effect on perceived pain and narcotic consumption. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted between August 2015 and January 2016. Patients were assigned to three groups. In group A, an ankle block was performed before ankle tourniquet inflation; in group B, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation; and in group C, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation with additional local anesthetic placed around the incision at the end of the procedure. Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, which was recorded at discharge, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 2 weeks after surgery. Narcotic consumption was recorded at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results. The only statistically significant difference in mean VAS scores occurred at 24 hours, when patients who received an ankle block after tourniquet inflation with local incisional anesthetic at closure (group C) had a mean VAS score 2.8 points lower (3.5 vs 6.3; P =.025) than those who received only an ankle block after tourniquet inflation (group B). There was no difference in narcotic consumption between groups at 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. The timing of ankle block in relation to tourniquet inflation did not have an effect on pain control in forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot reconstruction. The synergistic effect of an ankle block with additional incisional anesthetic at closure, is more effective than ankle block alone and is the ideal combination for postoperative pain control in foot surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.

AB - Background. Ankle blocks are used in the ambulatory surgery setting to control postoperative pain, which is often worst in the first 24 hours after surgery. We conducted a trial to determine whether the timing of ankle block administration in relation to ankle tourniquet inflation has an effect on perceived pain and narcotic consumption. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted between August 2015 and January 2016. Patients were assigned to three groups. In group A, an ankle block was performed before ankle tourniquet inflation; in group B, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation; and in group C, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation with additional local anesthetic placed around the incision at the end of the procedure. Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, which was recorded at discharge, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 2 weeks after surgery. Narcotic consumption was recorded at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results. The only statistically significant difference in mean VAS scores occurred at 24 hours, when patients who received an ankle block after tourniquet inflation with local incisional anesthetic at closure (group C) had a mean VAS score 2.8 points lower (3.5 vs 6.3; P =.025) than those who received only an ankle block after tourniquet inflation (group B). There was no difference in narcotic consumption between groups at 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. The timing of ankle block in relation to tourniquet inflation did not have an effect on pain control in forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot reconstruction. The synergistic effect of an ankle block with additional incisional anesthetic at closure, is more effective than ankle block alone and is the ideal combination for postoperative pain control in foot surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.

KW - complex foot and ankle conditions

KW - general disorders

KW - heel and arch pain

KW - pain in the ball of the feet

KW - pain management

KW - pharmacologic pain management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058613599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058613599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1938640017754233

DO - 10.1177/1938640017754233

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058613599

VL - 11

SP - 527

EP - 533

JO - Foot & ankle specialist

JF - Foot & ankle specialist

SN - 1938-6400

IS - 6

ER -