The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight

Rebecca Blue, Frederick Bonato, Kimberly Seaton, Andrea Bubka, Johnené L. Vardiman, Charles Mathers, Tarah L. Castleberry, James M. Vanderploeg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In commercial spaceflight, anxiety could become mission-impacting, causing negative experiences or endangering the flight itself. We studied layperson response to four varied-length training programs (ranging from 1 h-2 d of preparation) prior to centrifuge simulation of launch and re-entry acceleration profiles expected during suborbital spaceflight. We examined subject task execution, evaluating performance in high-stress conditions. We sought to identify any trends in demographics, hemodynamics, or similar factors in subjects with the highest anxiety or poorest tolerance of the experience. METHODS: Volunteers participated in one of four centrifuge training programs of varied complexity and duration, culminating in two simulated suborbital spaceflights. At most, subjects underwent seven centrifuge runs over 2 d, including two +Gz runs (peak +3.5 Gz, Run 2) and two +Gx runs (peak +6.0 Gx, Run 4) followed by three runs approximating suborbital spaceflight profiles (combined +Gx and +Gz, peak +6.0 Gx and +4.0 Gz). Two cohorts also received dedicated anxietymitigation training. Subjects were evaluated on their performance on various tasks, including a simulated emergency. RESULTS: Participating in 2-7 centrifuge exposures were 148 subjects (105 men, 43 women, age range 19-72 yr, mean 39.4 ± 13.2 yr, body mass index range 17.3-38.1, mean 25.1 ± 3.7). There were 10 subjects who withdrew or limited their G exposure; history of motion sickness was associated with opting out. Shorter length training programs were associated with elevated hemodynamic responses. Single-directional G training did not significantly improve tolerance. DISCUSSION: Training programs appear best when high fidelity and sequential exposures may improve tolerance of physical/ psychological flight stressors. The studied variables did not predict anxiety-related responses to these centrifuge profiles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-650
Number of pages10
JournalAerospace medicine and human performance
Volume88
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Space Flight
Task Performance and Analysis
Anxiety
Education
Hemodynamics
Motion Sickness
Volunteers
Body Mass Index
Emergencies
Demography
Psychology

Keywords

  • Acceleration
  • Anxiety
  • Anxiousness
  • Commercial spaceflight
  • Emergency
  • G exposure
  • Layperson
  • Panic
  • Spaceflight participant
  • Tolerance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Blue, R., Bonato, F., Seaton, K., Bubka, A., Vardiman, J. L., Mathers, C., ... Vanderploeg, J. M. (2017). The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight. Aerospace medicine and human performance, 88(7), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4807.2017

The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight. / Blue, Rebecca; Bonato, Frederick; Seaton, Kimberly; Bubka, Andrea; Vardiman, Johnené L.; Mathers, Charles; Castleberry, Tarah L.; Vanderploeg, James M.

In: Aerospace medicine and human performance, Vol. 88, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 641-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blue, R, Bonato, F, Seaton, K, Bubka, A, Vardiman, JL, Mathers, C, Castleberry, TL & Vanderploeg, JM 2017, 'The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight', Aerospace medicine and human performance, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 641-650. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4807.2017
Blue, Rebecca ; Bonato, Frederick ; Seaton, Kimberly ; Bubka, Andrea ; Vardiman, Johnené L. ; Mathers, Charles ; Castleberry, Tarah L. ; Vanderploeg, James M. / The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight. In: Aerospace medicine and human performance. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 7. pp. 641-650.
@article{c31223c4d25c455aa27dfb1ff216441c,
title = "The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: In commercial spaceflight, anxiety could become mission-impacting, causing negative experiences or endangering the flight itself. We studied layperson response to four varied-length training programs (ranging from 1 h-2 d of preparation) prior to centrifuge simulation of launch and re-entry acceleration profiles expected during suborbital spaceflight. We examined subject task execution, evaluating performance in high-stress conditions. We sought to identify any trends in demographics, hemodynamics, or similar factors in subjects with the highest anxiety or poorest tolerance of the experience. METHODS: Volunteers participated in one of four centrifuge training programs of varied complexity and duration, culminating in two simulated suborbital spaceflights. At most, subjects underwent seven centrifuge runs over 2 d, including two +Gz runs (peak +3.5 Gz, Run 2) and two +Gx runs (peak +6.0 Gx, Run 4) followed by three runs approximating suborbital spaceflight profiles (combined +Gx and +Gz, peak +6.0 Gx and +4.0 Gz). Two cohorts also received dedicated anxietymitigation training. Subjects were evaluated on their performance on various tasks, including a simulated emergency. RESULTS: Participating in 2-7 centrifuge exposures were 148 subjects (105 men, 43 women, age range 19-72 yr, mean 39.4 ± 13.2 yr, body mass index range 17.3-38.1, mean 25.1 ± 3.7). There were 10 subjects who withdrew or limited their G exposure; history of motion sickness was associated with opting out. Shorter length training programs were associated with elevated hemodynamic responses. Single-directional G training did not significantly improve tolerance. DISCUSSION: Training programs appear best when high fidelity and sequential exposures may improve tolerance of physical/ psychological flight stressors. The studied variables did not predict anxiety-related responses to these centrifuge profiles.",
keywords = "Acceleration, Anxiety, Anxiousness, Commercial spaceflight, Emergency, G exposure, Layperson, Panic, Spaceflight participant, Tolerance",
author = "Rebecca Blue and Frederick Bonato and Kimberly Seaton and Andrea Bubka and Vardiman, {Johnen{\'e} L.} and Charles Mathers and Castleberry, {Tarah L.} and Vanderploeg, {James M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3357/AMHP.4807.2017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "641--650",
journal = "Aerospace medicine and human performance",
issn = "2375-6314",
publisher = "Aerospace Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of training on anxiety and task performance in simulated suborbital spaceflight

AU - Blue, Rebecca

AU - Bonato, Frederick

AU - Seaton, Kimberly

AU - Bubka, Andrea

AU - Vardiman, Johnené L.

AU - Mathers, Charles

AU - Castleberry, Tarah L.

AU - Vanderploeg, James M.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: In commercial spaceflight, anxiety could become mission-impacting, causing negative experiences or endangering the flight itself. We studied layperson response to four varied-length training programs (ranging from 1 h-2 d of preparation) prior to centrifuge simulation of launch and re-entry acceleration profiles expected during suborbital spaceflight. We examined subject task execution, evaluating performance in high-stress conditions. We sought to identify any trends in demographics, hemodynamics, or similar factors in subjects with the highest anxiety or poorest tolerance of the experience. METHODS: Volunteers participated in one of four centrifuge training programs of varied complexity and duration, culminating in two simulated suborbital spaceflights. At most, subjects underwent seven centrifuge runs over 2 d, including two +Gz runs (peak +3.5 Gz, Run 2) and two +Gx runs (peak +6.0 Gx, Run 4) followed by three runs approximating suborbital spaceflight profiles (combined +Gx and +Gz, peak +6.0 Gx and +4.0 Gz). Two cohorts also received dedicated anxietymitigation training. Subjects were evaluated on their performance on various tasks, including a simulated emergency. RESULTS: Participating in 2-7 centrifuge exposures were 148 subjects (105 men, 43 women, age range 19-72 yr, mean 39.4 ± 13.2 yr, body mass index range 17.3-38.1, mean 25.1 ± 3.7). There were 10 subjects who withdrew or limited their G exposure; history of motion sickness was associated with opting out. Shorter length training programs were associated with elevated hemodynamic responses. Single-directional G training did not significantly improve tolerance. DISCUSSION: Training programs appear best when high fidelity and sequential exposures may improve tolerance of physical/ psychological flight stressors. The studied variables did not predict anxiety-related responses to these centrifuge profiles.

AB - INTRODUCTION: In commercial spaceflight, anxiety could become mission-impacting, causing negative experiences or endangering the flight itself. We studied layperson response to four varied-length training programs (ranging from 1 h-2 d of preparation) prior to centrifuge simulation of launch and re-entry acceleration profiles expected during suborbital spaceflight. We examined subject task execution, evaluating performance in high-stress conditions. We sought to identify any trends in demographics, hemodynamics, or similar factors in subjects with the highest anxiety or poorest tolerance of the experience. METHODS: Volunteers participated in one of four centrifuge training programs of varied complexity and duration, culminating in two simulated suborbital spaceflights. At most, subjects underwent seven centrifuge runs over 2 d, including two +Gz runs (peak +3.5 Gz, Run 2) and two +Gx runs (peak +6.0 Gx, Run 4) followed by three runs approximating suborbital spaceflight profiles (combined +Gx and +Gz, peak +6.0 Gx and +4.0 Gz). Two cohorts also received dedicated anxietymitigation training. Subjects were evaluated on their performance on various tasks, including a simulated emergency. RESULTS: Participating in 2-7 centrifuge exposures were 148 subjects (105 men, 43 women, age range 19-72 yr, mean 39.4 ± 13.2 yr, body mass index range 17.3-38.1, mean 25.1 ± 3.7). There were 10 subjects who withdrew or limited their G exposure; history of motion sickness was associated with opting out. Shorter length training programs were associated with elevated hemodynamic responses. Single-directional G training did not significantly improve tolerance. DISCUSSION: Training programs appear best when high fidelity and sequential exposures may improve tolerance of physical/ psychological flight stressors. The studied variables did not predict anxiety-related responses to these centrifuge profiles.

KW - Acceleration

KW - Anxiety

KW - Anxiousness

KW - Commercial spaceflight

KW - Emergency

KW - G exposure

KW - Layperson

KW - Panic

KW - Spaceflight participant

KW - Tolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021053511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021053511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3357/AMHP.4807.2017

DO - 10.3357/AMHP.4807.2017

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 641

EP - 650

JO - Aerospace medicine and human performance

JF - Aerospace medicine and human performance

SN - 2375-6314

IS - 7

ER -