The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: Promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial

  • Donna L. Berry
  • , Fangxin Hong
  • , Barbara Halpenny
  • , Anne Partridge
  • , Erica Fox
  • , Jesse R. Fann
  • , Seth Wolpin
  • , William B. Lober
  • , Nigel Bush
  • , Upendra Parvathaneni
  • , Dagmar Amtmann
  • , Rosemary Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The electronic self report assessment - cancer (ESRA-C), has been shown to reduce symptom distress during cancer therapy The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate aspects of how the ESRA-C intervention may have resulted in lower symptom distress (SD).Methods: Patients at two cancer centers were randomized to ESRA-C assessment only (control) or the Web-based ESRA-C intervention delivered to patients' homes or to a tablet in clinic. The intervention allowed patients to self-monitor symptom and quality of life (SxQOL) between visits, receive self-care education and coaching to report SxQOL to clinicians. Summaries of assessments were delivered to clinicians in both groups. Audio-recordings of clinic visits made 6 weeks after treatment initiation were coded for discussions of 26 SxQOL issues, focusing on patients'/caregivers' coached verbal reports of SxQOL severity, pattern, alleviating/aggravating factors and requests for help. Among issues identified as problematic, two measures were defined for each patient: the percent SxQOL reported that included a coached statement, and an index of verbalized coached statements per SxQOL. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare measures between groups. Clinician responses to problematic SxQOL were compared. A mediation analysis was conducted, exploring the effect of verbal reports on SD outcomes.Results: 517 (256 intervention) clinic visits were audio-recorded. General discussion of problematic SxQOL was similar in both groups. Control group patients reported a median 75% of problematic SxQOL using any specific coached statement compared to a median 85% in the intervention group (p = .0009). The median report index of coached statements was 0.25 for the control group and 0.31 for the intervention group (p = 0.008). Fatigue, pain and physical function issues were reported significantly more often in the intervention group (all p < .05). Clinicians' verbalized responses did not differ between groups. Patients' verbal reports did not mediate final SD outcomes (p = .41).Conclusions: Adding electronically-delivered, self-care instructions and communication coaching to ESRA-C promoted specific patient descriptions of problematic SxQOL issues compared with ESRA-C assessment alone. However, clinician verbal responses were no different and subsequent symptom distress group differences were not mediated by the patients' reports.Trial registration: NCT00852852; 26 Feb 2009.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number513
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 12 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Coaching
  • Internet
  • Patient-provider communication
  • Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: Promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this