The fate of syndesmotic screws

Kyle Stuart, Vinod Panchbhavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A standard protocol for the management of syndesmosis injuries has yet to be established. Debate persists regarding number of screws, screw diameter, number of cortices purchased, and the need for and timing of screw removal. The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to screw fixation that may lead to the ultimate failure of syndesmosis fixation defined as a loss of reduction of the syndesmosis, screw breakage, screw loosening, or widening of the medial clear space. Materials and Methods: A retrospective assessment of 137 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint at a single institution from 2004 to 2008 was performed. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded regarding problems with questionable clinical significance (number of syndesmotic screws, number of cortices, screw diameter, screw location, hardware failure) and loss of syndesmosis reduction. A series of Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate outcomes. A p value of 0.05 defined as significant. Results: The 3.5-mm diameter screws were statistically more likely to break than 4- or 4.5-mm screws, but there was no difference in frequency of loss of reduction of the syndesmosis as a function of screw diameter; however, a power study revealed an n value of 1656 would be required to show a significant difference. Conclusion: Screw diameter may have an effect on screw breakage but clinical significance of hardware failure itself is unknown including whether or not it results in a loss of reduction or failure of syndesmotic fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-525
Number of pages7
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Joints
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Ankle joint
  • Articular
  • Bone screws
  • Fracture fixation
  • Internal
  • Ligaments
  • Syndesmosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The fate of syndesmotic screws. / Stuart, Kyle; Panchbhavi, Vinod.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 32, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 519-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stuart, Kyle ; Panchbhavi, Vinod. / The fate of syndesmotic screws. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 519-525.
@article{795a7af4db734cd0971ee81aedbdbe18,
title = "The fate of syndesmotic screws",
abstract = "Background: A standard protocol for the management of syndesmosis injuries has yet to be established. Debate persists regarding number of screws, screw diameter, number of cortices purchased, and the need for and timing of screw removal. The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to screw fixation that may lead to the ultimate failure of syndesmosis fixation defined as a loss of reduction of the syndesmosis, screw breakage, screw loosening, or widening of the medial clear space. Materials and Methods: A retrospective assessment of 137 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint at a single institution from 2004 to 2008 was performed. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded regarding problems with questionable clinical significance (number of syndesmotic screws, number of cortices, screw diameter, screw location, hardware failure) and loss of syndesmosis reduction. A series of Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate outcomes. A p value of 0.05 defined as significant. Results: The 3.5-mm diameter screws were statistically more likely to break than 4- or 4.5-mm screws, but there was no difference in frequency of loss of reduction of the syndesmosis as a function of screw diameter; however, a power study revealed an n value of 1656 would be required to show a significant difference. Conclusion: Screw diameter may have an effect on screw breakage but clinical significance of hardware failure itself is unknown including whether or not it results in a loss of reduction or failure of syndesmotic fixation.",
keywords = "Ankle joint, Articular, Bone screws, Fracture fixation, Internal, Ligaments, Syndesmosis",
author = "Kyle Stuart and Vinod Panchbhavi",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3113/FAI.2011.0519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "519--525",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fate of syndesmotic screws

AU - Stuart, Kyle

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Background: A standard protocol for the management of syndesmosis injuries has yet to be established. Debate persists regarding number of screws, screw diameter, number of cortices purchased, and the need for and timing of screw removal. The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to screw fixation that may lead to the ultimate failure of syndesmosis fixation defined as a loss of reduction of the syndesmosis, screw breakage, screw loosening, or widening of the medial clear space. Materials and Methods: A retrospective assessment of 137 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint at a single institution from 2004 to 2008 was performed. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded regarding problems with questionable clinical significance (number of syndesmotic screws, number of cortices, screw diameter, screw location, hardware failure) and loss of syndesmosis reduction. A series of Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate outcomes. A p value of 0.05 defined as significant. Results: The 3.5-mm diameter screws were statistically more likely to break than 4- or 4.5-mm screws, but there was no difference in frequency of loss of reduction of the syndesmosis as a function of screw diameter; however, a power study revealed an n value of 1656 would be required to show a significant difference. Conclusion: Screw diameter may have an effect on screw breakage but clinical significance of hardware failure itself is unknown including whether or not it results in a loss of reduction or failure of syndesmotic fixation.

AB - Background: A standard protocol for the management of syndesmosis injuries has yet to be established. Debate persists regarding number of screws, screw diameter, number of cortices purchased, and the need for and timing of screw removal. The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to screw fixation that may lead to the ultimate failure of syndesmosis fixation defined as a loss of reduction of the syndesmosis, screw breakage, screw loosening, or widening of the medial clear space. Materials and Methods: A retrospective assessment of 137 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint at a single institution from 2004 to 2008 was performed. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded regarding problems with questionable clinical significance (number of syndesmotic screws, number of cortices, screw diameter, screw location, hardware failure) and loss of syndesmosis reduction. A series of Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate outcomes. A p value of 0.05 defined as significant. Results: The 3.5-mm diameter screws were statistically more likely to break than 4- or 4.5-mm screws, but there was no difference in frequency of loss of reduction of the syndesmosis as a function of screw diameter; however, a power study revealed an n value of 1656 would be required to show a significant difference. Conclusion: Screw diameter may have an effect on screw breakage but clinical significance of hardware failure itself is unknown including whether or not it results in a loss of reduction or failure of syndesmotic fixation.

KW - Ankle joint

KW - Articular

KW - Bone screws

KW - Fracture fixation

KW - Internal

KW - Ligaments

KW - Syndesmosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955705162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955705162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3113/FAI.2011.0519

DO - 10.3113/FAI.2011.0519

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 519

EP - 525

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 5

ER -