The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study

Zakkoyya H. Lewis, Kenneth Ottenbacher, Steven Fisher, Kristofer Jennings, Arleen F. Brown, Maria Swartz, Eloisa Martinez, Elizabeth Lyons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Conducting 5 A's counseling in clinic and utilizing technology-based resources are recommended to promote physical activity but little is known about how to implement such an intervention. This investigation aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, of a pragmatic, primary care-based intervention that incorporated 5 A's counseling and self-control through an activity monitor. Methods: Primary care patients (n = 40) 55-74 years of age were recruited and randomized to receive a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor (EAM), Jawbone UP24, to monitor activity for 12 weeks. Participants were also invited to a focus group after completing the intervention. Stakeholders (n = 36) were recruited to provide feedback. Results: The intervention recruitment rate was 24.7%. The attrition rate was 20% with a significantly higher rate for the pedometer group (p = 0.02). The EAM group increased their minutes of physical activity by 11.1 min/day while the pedometer maintained their activity (0.2 min/day), with no significant group difference. EAM participants liked using their monitor and would continue wearing it while the pedometer group was neutral to these statements (p < 0.05). Over the 12 weeks there were 490 comments and 1094 "likes" given to study peers in the corresponding application for the UP24 monitor. Some EAM participants enjoyed the social interaction feature while others were uncomfortable talking to strangers. Participants stated they would want counseling from a counselor and not their physician or a nurse. Other notable comments included incorporating multiple health behaviors, more in-person counseling with a counselor, and having a funding source for sustainability. Conclusions: Overall, the study was well-received but the results raise a number of considerations. Practitioners, counselors, and researchers should consider the following before implementing a similar intervention: 1) utilize PA counselors, 2) target multiple health behaviors, 3) form a social support group, 4) identify a funding source for sustainability, and 5) be mindful of concerns with technology. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov- NCT02554435. Registered 24 August 2015.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 2017

Fingerprint

Counseling
Maintenance
Health Behavior
Health
Primary Health Care
Exercise
Technology
Self-Help Groups
Interpersonal Relations
Focus Groups
Social Support
Nurses
Research Personnel
Physicians
Counselors

Keywords

  • Activity monitor
  • Jawbone
  • Older adults
  • Pedometer
  • Physical activity
  • Pragmatic
  • Primary care
  • RE-AIM
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study. / Lewis, Zakkoyya H.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Fisher, Steven; Jennings, Kristofer; Brown, Arleen F.; Swartz, Maria; Martinez, Eloisa; Lyons, Elizabeth.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 14, No. 1, 106, 14.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27ef45ecc88f41b68d89c692c8be8de9,
title = "The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study",
abstract = "Background: Conducting 5 A's counseling in clinic and utilizing technology-based resources are recommended to promote physical activity but little is known about how to implement such an intervention. This investigation aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, of a pragmatic, primary care-based intervention that incorporated 5 A's counseling and self-control through an activity monitor. Methods: Primary care patients (n = 40) 55-74 years of age were recruited and randomized to receive a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor (EAM), Jawbone UP24, to monitor activity for 12 weeks. Participants were also invited to a focus group after completing the intervention. Stakeholders (n = 36) were recruited to provide feedback. Results: The intervention recruitment rate was 24.7{\%}. The attrition rate was 20{\%} with a significantly higher rate for the pedometer group (p = 0.02). The EAM group increased their minutes of physical activity by 11.1 min/day while the pedometer maintained their activity (0.2 min/day), with no significant group difference. EAM participants liked using their monitor and would continue wearing it while the pedometer group was neutral to these statements (p < 0.05). Over the 12 weeks there were 490 comments and 1094 {"}likes{"} given to study peers in the corresponding application for the UP24 monitor. Some EAM participants enjoyed the social interaction feature while others were uncomfortable talking to strangers. Participants stated they would want counseling from a counselor and not their physician or a nurse. Other notable comments included incorporating multiple health behaviors, more in-person counseling with a counselor, and having a funding source for sustainability. Conclusions: Overall, the study was well-received but the results raise a number of considerations. Practitioners, counselors, and researchers should consider the following before implementing a similar intervention: 1) utilize PA counselors, 2) target multiple health behaviors, 3) form a social support group, 4) identify a funding source for sustainability, and 5) be mindful of concerns with technology. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov- NCT02554435. Registered 24 August 2015.",
keywords = "Activity monitor, Jawbone, Older adults, Pedometer, Physical activity, Pragmatic, Primary care, RE-AIM, Technology",
author = "Lewis, {Zakkoyya H.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher and Steven Fisher and Kristofer Jennings and Brown, {Arleen F.} and Maria Swartz and Eloisa Martinez and Elizabeth Lyons",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s12966-017-0560-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
issn = "1479-5868",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study

AU - Lewis, Zakkoyya H.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Fisher, Steven

AU - Jennings, Kristofer

AU - Brown, Arleen F.

AU - Swartz, Maria

AU - Martinez, Eloisa

AU - Lyons, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/8/14

Y1 - 2017/8/14

N2 - Background: Conducting 5 A's counseling in clinic and utilizing technology-based resources are recommended to promote physical activity but little is known about how to implement such an intervention. This investigation aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, of a pragmatic, primary care-based intervention that incorporated 5 A's counseling and self-control through an activity monitor. Methods: Primary care patients (n = 40) 55-74 years of age were recruited and randomized to receive a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor (EAM), Jawbone UP24, to monitor activity for 12 weeks. Participants were also invited to a focus group after completing the intervention. Stakeholders (n = 36) were recruited to provide feedback. Results: The intervention recruitment rate was 24.7%. The attrition rate was 20% with a significantly higher rate for the pedometer group (p = 0.02). The EAM group increased their minutes of physical activity by 11.1 min/day while the pedometer maintained their activity (0.2 min/day), with no significant group difference. EAM participants liked using their monitor and would continue wearing it while the pedometer group was neutral to these statements (p < 0.05). Over the 12 weeks there were 490 comments and 1094 "likes" given to study peers in the corresponding application for the UP24 monitor. Some EAM participants enjoyed the social interaction feature while others were uncomfortable talking to strangers. Participants stated they would want counseling from a counselor and not their physician or a nurse. Other notable comments included incorporating multiple health behaviors, more in-person counseling with a counselor, and having a funding source for sustainability. Conclusions: Overall, the study was well-received but the results raise a number of considerations. Practitioners, counselors, and researchers should consider the following before implementing a similar intervention: 1) utilize PA counselors, 2) target multiple health behaviors, 3) form a social support group, 4) identify a funding source for sustainability, and 5) be mindful of concerns with technology. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov- NCT02554435. Registered 24 August 2015.

AB - Background: Conducting 5 A's counseling in clinic and utilizing technology-based resources are recommended to promote physical activity but little is known about how to implement such an intervention. This investigation aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, of a pragmatic, primary care-based intervention that incorporated 5 A's counseling and self-control through an activity monitor. Methods: Primary care patients (n = 40) 55-74 years of age were recruited and randomized to receive a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor (EAM), Jawbone UP24, to monitor activity for 12 weeks. Participants were also invited to a focus group after completing the intervention. Stakeholders (n = 36) were recruited to provide feedback. Results: The intervention recruitment rate was 24.7%. The attrition rate was 20% with a significantly higher rate for the pedometer group (p = 0.02). The EAM group increased their minutes of physical activity by 11.1 min/day while the pedometer maintained their activity (0.2 min/day), with no significant group difference. EAM participants liked using their monitor and would continue wearing it while the pedometer group was neutral to these statements (p < 0.05). Over the 12 weeks there were 490 comments and 1094 "likes" given to study peers in the corresponding application for the UP24 monitor. Some EAM participants enjoyed the social interaction feature while others were uncomfortable talking to strangers. Participants stated they would want counseling from a counselor and not their physician or a nurse. Other notable comments included incorporating multiple health behaviors, more in-person counseling with a counselor, and having a funding source for sustainability. Conclusions: Overall, the study was well-received but the results raise a number of considerations. Practitioners, counselors, and researchers should consider the following before implementing a similar intervention: 1) utilize PA counselors, 2) target multiple health behaviors, 3) form a social support group, 4) identify a funding source for sustainability, and 5) be mindful of concerns with technology. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov- NCT02554435. Registered 24 August 2015.

KW - Activity monitor

KW - Jawbone

KW - Older adults

KW - Pedometer

KW - Physical activity

KW - Pragmatic

KW - Primary care

KW - RE-AIM

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027270059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027270059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12966-017-0560-5

DO - 10.1186/s12966-017-0560-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 28807041

AN - SCOPUS:85027270059

VL - 14

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

SN - 1479-5868

IS - 1

M1 - 106

ER -