The Frequency and Reason For Amputations in Electrically Burned Pediatric Patients

Christian Tapking, Gabriel Hundeshagen, Daniel Popp, Jong Lee, David Herndon, Ramon Zapata Sirvent, Ludwik Branski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Electrical injuries induce substantial morbidity and mortality. Amputations are often necessary to enable survival and based on tissue nonviability, development of life-threatening infection, or expected nonfunctional outcome. They analyzed occurrence and type of amputations in their institution for electrical and nonelectrical pediatric burns and the number of reconstructive operations. Patients who underwent any amputation between 1999 and 2017 were identified. Patients with electrical burns (EB) were matched regarding age, sex, and percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burned to patients with nonelectrical burns (NEB). Both groups (n = 35 EB, n = 70 NEB) were comparable regarding age (EB, 11.6 ± 4.5 years; NEB, 11.1 ± 4.5 years, P = .550) and %TBSA (36.7 ± 15.4% and 37.7 ± 12.9%, P = .738). Major amputations (above wrist or ankle) were performed in 77% of EB vs 31% of NEB (P < .001). Amputations above knee or elbow were performed in 13 (37.1%) vs two patients (2.9%, P < .001). Eight (22.9%) vs six patients (8.6%) underwent combination of two or more major amputations (P = .042). In both groups, most amputations were performed for functional reasons. Length of stay was shorter in EB group (33 ± 27 vs 47 ± 38 days, P = .040). EB patients underwent 9.9 ± 7.1 total operations compared with 14.4 ± 5.1 operations (P < .001). Of these, 6.5 ± 3.6 and 7.9 ± 3.3 (P = .023) were performed during acute stay and 3.3 ± 4.8 and 6.5 ± 3.5 after acute stay (P < .001), respectively. Mortality was comparable. EB were associated with larger extent of limb loss and more major amputations than NEB with amputations. They furthermore required a smaller number of reconstructive procedures. EB require extra attention of caregivers, because of their extensive tissue damage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-111
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Burns
Amputation
Pediatrics
Mortality
Body Surface Area
Elbow
Wrist
Ankle
Caregivers
Length of Stay
Knee
Extremities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The Frequency and Reason For Amputations in Electrically Burned Pediatric Patients. / Tapking, Christian; Hundeshagen, Gabriel; Popp, Daniel; Lee, Jong; Herndon, David; Zapata Sirvent, Ramon; Branski, Ludwik.

In: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 107-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbc8c9b58db646719e7542ed11b00baa,
title = "The Frequency and Reason For Amputations in Electrically Burned Pediatric Patients",
abstract = "Electrical injuries induce substantial morbidity and mortality. Amputations are often necessary to enable survival and based on tissue nonviability, development of life-threatening infection, or expected nonfunctional outcome. They analyzed occurrence and type of amputations in their institution for electrical and nonelectrical pediatric burns and the number of reconstructive operations. Patients who underwent any amputation between 1999 and 2017 were identified. Patients with electrical burns (EB) were matched regarding age, sex, and percent total body surface area ({\%}TBSA) burned to patients with nonelectrical burns (NEB). Both groups (n = 35 EB, n = 70 NEB) were comparable regarding age (EB, 11.6 ± 4.5 years; NEB, 11.1 ± 4.5 years, P = .550) and {\%}TBSA (36.7 ± 15.4{\%} and 37.7 ± 12.9{\%}, P = .738). Major amputations (above wrist or ankle) were performed in 77{\%} of EB vs 31{\%} of NEB (P < .001). Amputations above knee or elbow were performed in 13 (37.1{\%}) vs two patients (2.9{\%}, P < .001). Eight (22.9{\%}) vs six patients (8.6{\%}) underwent combination of two or more major amputations (P = .042). In both groups, most amputations were performed for functional reasons. Length of stay was shorter in EB group (33 ± 27 vs 47 ± 38 days, P = .040). EB patients underwent 9.9 ± 7.1 total operations compared with 14.4 ± 5.1 operations (P < .001). Of these, 6.5 ± 3.6 and 7.9 ± 3.3 (P = .023) were performed during acute stay and 3.3 ± 4.8 and 6.5 ± 3.5 after acute stay (P < .001), respectively. Mortality was comparable. EB were associated with larger extent of limb loss and more major amputations than NEB with amputations. They furthermore required a smaller number of reconstructive procedures. EB require extra attention of caregivers, because of their extensive tissue damage.",
author = "Christian Tapking and Gabriel Hundeshagen and Daniel Popp and Jong Lee and David Herndon and {Zapata Sirvent}, Ramon and Ludwik Branski",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/iry056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "107--111",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Frequency and Reason For Amputations in Electrically Burned Pediatric Patients

AU - Tapking, Christian

AU - Hundeshagen, Gabriel

AU - Popp, Daniel

AU - Lee, Jong

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Zapata Sirvent, Ramon

AU - Branski, Ludwik

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Electrical injuries induce substantial morbidity and mortality. Amputations are often necessary to enable survival and based on tissue nonviability, development of life-threatening infection, or expected nonfunctional outcome. They analyzed occurrence and type of amputations in their institution for electrical and nonelectrical pediatric burns and the number of reconstructive operations. Patients who underwent any amputation between 1999 and 2017 were identified. Patients with electrical burns (EB) were matched regarding age, sex, and percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burned to patients with nonelectrical burns (NEB). Both groups (n = 35 EB, n = 70 NEB) were comparable regarding age (EB, 11.6 ± 4.5 years; NEB, 11.1 ± 4.5 years, P = .550) and %TBSA (36.7 ± 15.4% and 37.7 ± 12.9%, P = .738). Major amputations (above wrist or ankle) were performed in 77% of EB vs 31% of NEB (P < .001). Amputations above knee or elbow were performed in 13 (37.1%) vs two patients (2.9%, P < .001). Eight (22.9%) vs six patients (8.6%) underwent combination of two or more major amputations (P = .042). In both groups, most amputations were performed for functional reasons. Length of stay was shorter in EB group (33 ± 27 vs 47 ± 38 days, P = .040). EB patients underwent 9.9 ± 7.1 total operations compared with 14.4 ± 5.1 operations (P < .001). Of these, 6.5 ± 3.6 and 7.9 ± 3.3 (P = .023) were performed during acute stay and 3.3 ± 4.8 and 6.5 ± 3.5 after acute stay (P < .001), respectively. Mortality was comparable. EB were associated with larger extent of limb loss and more major amputations than NEB with amputations. They furthermore required a smaller number of reconstructive procedures. EB require extra attention of caregivers, because of their extensive tissue damage.

AB - Electrical injuries induce substantial morbidity and mortality. Amputations are often necessary to enable survival and based on tissue nonviability, development of life-threatening infection, or expected nonfunctional outcome. They analyzed occurrence and type of amputations in their institution for electrical and nonelectrical pediatric burns and the number of reconstructive operations. Patients who underwent any amputation between 1999 and 2017 were identified. Patients with electrical burns (EB) were matched regarding age, sex, and percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burned to patients with nonelectrical burns (NEB). Both groups (n = 35 EB, n = 70 NEB) were comparable regarding age (EB, 11.6 ± 4.5 years; NEB, 11.1 ± 4.5 years, P = .550) and %TBSA (36.7 ± 15.4% and 37.7 ± 12.9%, P = .738). Major amputations (above wrist or ankle) were performed in 77% of EB vs 31% of NEB (P < .001). Amputations above knee or elbow were performed in 13 (37.1%) vs two patients (2.9%, P < .001). Eight (22.9%) vs six patients (8.6%) underwent combination of two or more major amputations (P = .042). In both groups, most amputations were performed for functional reasons. Length of stay was shorter in EB group (33 ± 27 vs 47 ± 38 days, P = .040). EB patients underwent 9.9 ± 7.1 total operations compared with 14.4 ± 5.1 operations (P < .001). Of these, 6.5 ± 3.6 and 7.9 ± 3.3 (P = .023) were performed during acute stay and 3.3 ± 4.8 and 6.5 ± 3.5 after acute stay (P < .001), respectively. Mortality was comparable. EB were associated with larger extent of limb loss and more major amputations than NEB with amputations. They furthermore required a smaller number of reconstructive procedures. EB require extra attention of caregivers, because of their extensive tissue damage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058917165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058917165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iry056

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iry056

M3 - Article

C2 - 30371857

AN - SCOPUS:85058917165

VL - 40

SP - 107

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 1

ER -