TY - JOUR
T1 - The History of Alloplastic Ear Reconstruction for Microtia
AU - Kozusko, Steven D.
AU - Konofaos, Petros
AU - Wallace, Robert Doyle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Microtia reconstruction is a unique and challenging field in reconstructive surgery. In the early 20th century, many different alloplastic materials have been used in an attempt to recreate the fibrocartilaginous framework of the native ear. These materials include celluloid, tantalum wire cage, nylon mesh, polyethylene, and acrylic. The first standard for alloplastic microtia reconstruction, silicone, is one fraught with complications and failures. This alloplastic material is walled off by the host and prone to scar tissue formation and extrusion. Alloplastic microtia reconstruction largely shifts to porous polyethylene, where the results are markedly superior. This is attributed to the porous structure of porous polyethylene, which allows tissue ingrowth. Moreover, the use of the temporoparietal fascia flap for total coverage of the implant has impressively lowered the risk of implant extrusion. However, there is paucity in the literature regarding the evolution of alloplastic microtia reconstruction, especially characterizing historical mistakes, significant technique evolutions, and drawbacks/advantages of materials. This review serves as a guide both to avoid repeating mistakes and to improve outcomes.
AB - Microtia reconstruction is a unique and challenging field in reconstructive surgery. In the early 20th century, many different alloplastic materials have been used in an attempt to recreate the fibrocartilaginous framework of the native ear. These materials include celluloid, tantalum wire cage, nylon mesh, polyethylene, and acrylic. The first standard for alloplastic microtia reconstruction, silicone, is one fraught with complications and failures. This alloplastic material is walled off by the host and prone to scar tissue formation and extrusion. Alloplastic microtia reconstruction largely shifts to porous polyethylene, where the results are markedly superior. This is attributed to the porous structure of porous polyethylene, which allows tissue ingrowth. Moreover, the use of the temporoparietal fascia flap for total coverage of the implant has impressively lowered the risk of implant extrusion. However, there is paucity in the literature regarding the evolution of alloplastic microtia reconstruction, especially characterizing historical mistakes, significant technique evolutions, and drawbacks/advantages of materials. This review serves as a guide both to avoid repeating mistakes and to improve outcomes.
KW - alloplastic reconstruction
KW - microtia
KW - porous polyethylene
KW - silicone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086523052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086523052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002213
DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002213
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31913888
AN - SCOPUS:85086523052
SN - 0148-7043
VL - 85
SP - 89
EP - 92
JO - Annals of plastic surgery
JF - Annals of plastic surgery
IS - 1
ER -