The comparative holding strength of cannulated screws (CS) versus solid core screws (SCS) has not been reported, although differences exist in the respective diameters of their outer thread and pilot drill holes. Our objectives were to characterize these differences and determine the holding power of CS compared with SCS in cortical and cancellous bone. The dimensions of the Synthes (Paoli, PA) 3.5-mm SCS, 3.5-mm CS, 6.5-mm SCS, and 7.0-mm CS were measured, and the cross-sectional area for thread purchase was calculated. Using adult canine femurs, small-fragment 3.5-mm SCS were inserted in cortical (midshaft) and cancellous (condyle) bone of one limb, and CS were placed in similar locations in the contralateral limb. The same technique was used for large-fragment CS and SCS. Pull-out testing was performed using an MTS machine (MTS Systems, Minneapolis, MN) with axial loads applied at 5 mm/s, and data were analyzed to determine the effects of screw type, location, and size. Differences in CS versus SCS design result in higher cross-sectional areas available for SCS thread purchase. Yet no significant differences exists between screw types (SCS vs. CS) in either cortical or cancellous bone. In cancellous bone, large-fragment screws required more force to pull out than did small screws (p = 0.000). The mean force required to pull out small-fragment screws was higher in cortical bone than in cancellous bone (p = 0.000). These data suggest that the clinical decision to use CS versus SCS should not be based on pull-out strength.
- Cancellous bone
- Cannulated screw versus solid core screw
- Cortical bone
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine