The immunogenicity of an HIV-1 Gag conserved element DNA vaccine in people with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy

  • Jeffrey M. Jacobson
  • , Barbara K. Felber
  • , Huichao Chen
  • , George N. Pavlakis
  • , James I. Mullins
  • , Stephen C. De Rosa
  • , Daniel R. Kuritzkes
  • , Georgia D. Tomaras
  • , Jennifer Kinslow
  • , Yajing Bao
  • , Maxine Olefsky
  • , Margherita Rosati
  • , Jenifer Bear
  • , Jack R. Heptinstall
  • , Lu Zhang
  • , Sheetal Sawant
  • , Drew Hannaman
  • , Gregory M. Laird
  • , Joshua C. Cyktor
  • , Sonya L. Heath
  • Ann C. Collier, Susan L. Koletar, Babafemi O. Taiwo, Pablo Tebas, David A. Wohl, Pablo F. Belaunzaran-Zamudio, M. Juliana McElrath, Alan L. Landay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective:The primary objective of the study was to assess the immunogenicity of an HIV-1 Gag conserved element DNA vaccine (p24CE DNA) in people with HIV (PWH) receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART).Design:AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5369 was a phase I/IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of PWH receiving ART with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml, current CD4+T-cell counts greater than 500 cells/μl, and nadir CD4+T-cell counts greater than 350 cells/μl.Methods:The study enrolled 45 participants randomized 2 : 1 : 1 to receive p24CE DNA vaccine at weeks 0 and 4, followed by p24CE DNA admixed with full-length p55GagDNA vaccine at weeks 12 and 24 (arm A); full-length p55GagDNA vaccine at weeks 0, 4, 12, and 24 (arm B); or placebo at weeks 0, 4, 12, and 24 (arm C). The active and placebo vaccines were administered by intramuscular electroporation.Results:There was a modest, but significantly greater increase in the number of conserved elements recognized by CD4+and/or CD8+T cells in arm A compared with arm C (P = 0.014). The percentage of participants with an increased number of conserved elements recognized by T cells was also highest in arm A (8/18, 44.4%) vs. arm C (0/10, 0.0%) (P = 0.025). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in the change in magnitude of responses to total conserved elements.Conclusion:A DNA-delivered HIV-1 Gag conserved element vaccine boosted by a combination of this vaccine with a full-length p55GagDNA vaccine induced a new conserved element-directed cellular immune response in approximately half the treated PWH on ART.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)963-973
Number of pages11
JournalAIDS
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DNA vaccine
  • HIV
  • HIV-1 Gag
  • clinical trial
  • conserved epitope
  • electroporation
  • therapeutic vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The immunogenicity of an HIV-1 Gag conserved element DNA vaccine in people with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this