“The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy

Giuseppe Chiossi, Stefano Palomba, Sara Balduzzi, Maged Costantine, Angela I. Falbo, Giovanni B. la Sala

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective To investigate whether different antenatal care models could account for differences in operative delivery rates and adverse neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women, and to identify independent variables associated with delivery modes and adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design Retrospective cohort from a single center of singleton, term, live births between January 2012 and June 2014. Rates of cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, and neonatal morbidities were analyzed among women followed by private obstetrician-gynecologists versus national health system providers (certified nurse midwifes supervised by obstetrician-gynecologists), and adjusted for potential confounders. Results Among the 2,831 women in our cohort, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were independent of obstetric providers. After we controlled for confounders, private patients having more than four antenatal ultrasound examinations were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than public patients with four or fewer sonographic assessments (five to eight prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–8; nine or more prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 4.1; 95% CI 1.2–14). Conclusions Multiple prenatal ultrasound examinations in low-risk obstetric populations appear to be an independent and potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean deliveries.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Nov 28 2015

    Fingerprint

    Obstetrics
    Pregnancy
    Odds Ratio
    Confidence Intervals
    Term Birth
    Nurse Midwives
    Prenatal Care
    Live Birth
    Pregnant Women
    Retrospective Studies
    Morbidity
    Health
    Population

    Keywords

    • cesarean delivery
    • operative delivery
    • prenatal ultrasound scanning
    • private patients

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Cite this

    Chiossi, G., Palomba, S., Balduzzi, S., Costantine, M., Falbo, A. I., & la Sala, G. B. (Accepted/In press). “The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy. American Journal of Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571200

    “The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy. / Chiossi, Giuseppe; Palomba, Stefano; Balduzzi, Sara; Costantine, Maged; Falbo, Angela I.; la Sala, Giovanni B.

    In: American Journal of Perinatology, 28.11.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Chiossi, Giuseppe ; Palomba, Stefano ; Balduzzi, Sara ; Costantine, Maged ; Falbo, Angela I. ; la Sala, Giovanni B. / “The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2015.
    @article{242582a41a044ab382292006e8d5c27d,
    title = "“The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy",
    abstract = "Objective To investigate whether different antenatal care models could account for differences in operative delivery rates and adverse neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women, and to identify independent variables associated with delivery modes and adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design Retrospective cohort from a single center of singleton, term, live births between January 2012 and June 2014. Rates of cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, and neonatal morbidities were analyzed among women followed by private obstetrician-gynecologists versus national health system providers (certified nurse midwifes supervised by obstetrician-gynecologists), and adjusted for potential confounders. Results Among the 2,831 women in our cohort, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were independent of obstetric providers. After we controlled for confounders, private patients having more than four antenatal ultrasound examinations were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than public patients with four or fewer sonographic assessments (five to eight prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 3.3; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.4–8; nine or more prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 4.1; 95{\%} CI 1.2–14). Conclusions Multiple prenatal ultrasound examinations in low-risk obstetric populations appear to be an independent and potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean deliveries.",
    keywords = "cesarean delivery, operative delivery, prenatal ultrasound scanning, private patients",
    author = "Giuseppe Chiossi and Stefano Palomba and Sara Balduzzi and Maged Costantine and Falbo, {Angela I.} and {la Sala}, {Giovanni B.}",
    year = "2015",
    month = "11",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1571200",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
    issn = "0735-1631",
    publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - “The More the Better” Paradox of Antenatal Ultrasound Examinations in Low-Risk Pregnancy

    AU - Chiossi, Giuseppe

    AU - Palomba, Stefano

    AU - Balduzzi, Sara

    AU - Costantine, Maged

    AU - Falbo, Angela I.

    AU - la Sala, Giovanni B.

    PY - 2015/11/28

    Y1 - 2015/11/28

    N2 - Objective To investigate whether different antenatal care models could account for differences in operative delivery rates and adverse neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women, and to identify independent variables associated with delivery modes and adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design Retrospective cohort from a single center of singleton, term, live births between January 2012 and June 2014. Rates of cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, and neonatal morbidities were analyzed among women followed by private obstetrician-gynecologists versus national health system providers (certified nurse midwifes supervised by obstetrician-gynecologists), and adjusted for potential confounders. Results Among the 2,831 women in our cohort, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were independent of obstetric providers. After we controlled for confounders, private patients having more than four antenatal ultrasound examinations were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than public patients with four or fewer sonographic assessments (five to eight prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–8; nine or more prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 4.1; 95% CI 1.2–14). Conclusions Multiple prenatal ultrasound examinations in low-risk obstetric populations appear to be an independent and potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean deliveries.

    AB - Objective To investigate whether different antenatal care models could account for differences in operative delivery rates and adverse neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women, and to identify independent variables associated with delivery modes and adverse neonatal outcomes. Study design Retrospective cohort from a single center of singleton, term, live births between January 2012 and June 2014. Rates of cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, and neonatal morbidities were analyzed among women followed by private obstetrician-gynecologists versus national health system providers (certified nurse midwifes supervised by obstetrician-gynecologists), and adjusted for potential confounders. Results Among the 2,831 women in our cohort, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were independent of obstetric providers. After we controlled for confounders, private patients having more than four antenatal ultrasound examinations were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than public patients with four or fewer sonographic assessments (five to eight prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–8; nine or more prenatal scans: relative risk ratio, 4.1; 95% CI 1.2–14). Conclusions Multiple prenatal ultrasound examinations in low-risk obstetric populations appear to be an independent and potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean deliveries.

    KW - cesarean delivery

    KW - operative delivery

    KW - prenatal ultrasound scanning

    KW - private patients

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957899835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957899835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1571200

    DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1571200

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 26862726

    AN - SCOPUS:84957899835

    JO - American Journal of Perinatology

    JF - American Journal of Perinatology

    SN - 0735-1631

    ER -