The proatlas: A comprehensive review with clinical implications

Mitchel Muhleman, Ordessia Charran, Petru Matusz, Mohammadali M. Shoja, R. Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The proatlas is derived from the fourth occipital sclerotome in human embryos. It usually fuses with the three upper occipital sclerotomes to form the occipital bone. However, this does not always occur. Manifestations of a partial proatlas structure may persist due to failure of fusion. Clinical considerations: These embryological remnants can induce several symptoms in humans, ranging from mild to severe. On occasion, this structure can go unnoticed until a precipitating traumatic event results in symptoms. Proatlas segmentation abnormalities form bony masses at C1 and the foramen magnum. A number of surgical procedures have been devised to rectify the resulting neural compression and vascular compromise. Discussion: This paper will discuss the development of the proatlas and the resultant anomalies associated with its failure to merge with the occipital sclerotomes to form the occipital bone. In addition, some consideration of comparative anatomy and surgical techniques will be presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-356
Number of pages8
JournalChild's Nervous System
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Atlantic ponticles
  • Basilar process
  • Bicorunate dens
  • Condylus tertius
  • Labia of the posterior margin of the foramen magnum
  • Median (third) occipital condyle
  • Occipital sclerotome
  • Ossiculum terminale persistens
  • Paracondylar and epitransverse processes
  • Partial regressive occipital vertebra
  • Rudimentary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The proatlas: A comprehensive review with clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this