The reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in patients with burns

William S. Dewey, Travis L. Hedman, Ted T. Chapman, Steven Wolf, John B. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Water volumetry is considered the "gold standard" for hand edema assessment. This technique requires considerable time, staff, and specialized equipment. The figure-of-eight method for hand edema assessment has been tested only in the orthopedic population. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in the burn patient population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective blinded study with 20 burned patients (33 edematous hands) admitted from February to May 2005. Two testers performed three separate blinded measurements on each edematous hand, using the figure-of-eight technique. A third tester performed two measurements, using water volumetry. An independent investigator recorded all measurements. Intratester and intertester reliability were analyzed. Concurrent validity was examined and compared with water volumetry measurements. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the intratester reliability of the figure-of-eight method were 0.96 for tester 1 and 0.97 for tester 2. The ICC for intertester reliability of the figure-of-eight measurements was 0.94. The intratester ICC for volumetric measurements was 0.99. Correlation coefficient (Pearson's) for tester 1 was 0.83 (P < .01), and for tester 2, 0.89 (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The figure-of-eight technique is a reliable and valid measurement tool for measuring hand edema. This technique is a more clinically feasible tool than water volumetry in the burn patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-162
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Burns
Reproducibility of Results
Edema
Hand
Water
Population
Orthopedics
Research Personnel
Prospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in patients with burns. / Dewey, William S.; Hedman, Travis L.; Chapman, Ted T.; Wolf, Steven; Holcomb, John B.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 157-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dewey, William S. ; Hedman, Travis L. ; Chapman, Ted T. ; Wolf, Steven ; Holcomb, John B. / The reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in patients with burns. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2007 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 157-162.
@article{7c113124a722464d9a7dd6479ce59f6e,
title = "The reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in patients with burns",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Water volumetry is considered the {"}gold standard{"} for hand edema assessment. This technique requires considerable time, staff, and specialized equipment. The figure-of-eight method for hand edema assessment has been tested only in the orthopedic population. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in the burn patient population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective blinded study with 20 burned patients (33 edematous hands) admitted from February to May 2005. Two testers performed three separate blinded measurements on each edematous hand, using the figure-of-eight technique. A third tester performed two measurements, using water volumetry. An independent investigator recorded all measurements. Intratester and intertester reliability were analyzed. Concurrent validity was examined and compared with water volumetry measurements. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the intratester reliability of the figure-of-eight method were 0.96 for tester 1 and 0.97 for tester 2. The ICC for intertester reliability of the figure-of-eight measurements was 0.94. The intratester ICC for volumetric measurements was 0.99. Correlation coefficient (Pearson's) for tester 1 was 0.83 (P < .01), and for tester 2, 0.89 (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The figure-of-eight technique is a reliable and valid measurement tool for measuring hand edema. This technique is a more clinically feasible tool than water volumetry in the burn patient population.",
author = "Dewey, {William S.} and Hedman, {Travis L.} and Chapman, {Ted T.} and Steven Wolf and Holcomb, {John B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BCR.0b013e31802c9eb9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "157--162",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in patients with burns

AU - Dewey, William S.

AU - Hedman, Travis L.

AU - Chapman, Ted T.

AU - Wolf, Steven

AU - Holcomb, John B.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Water volumetry is considered the "gold standard" for hand edema assessment. This technique requires considerable time, staff, and specialized equipment. The figure-of-eight method for hand edema assessment has been tested only in the orthopedic population. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in the burn patient population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective blinded study with 20 burned patients (33 edematous hands) admitted from February to May 2005. Two testers performed three separate blinded measurements on each edematous hand, using the figure-of-eight technique. A third tester performed two measurements, using water volumetry. An independent investigator recorded all measurements. Intratester and intertester reliability were analyzed. Concurrent validity was examined and compared with water volumetry measurements. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the intratester reliability of the figure-of-eight method were 0.96 for tester 1 and 0.97 for tester 2. The ICC for intertester reliability of the figure-of-eight measurements was 0.94. The intratester ICC for volumetric measurements was 0.99. Correlation coefficient (Pearson's) for tester 1 was 0.83 (P < .01), and for tester 2, 0.89 (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The figure-of-eight technique is a reliable and valid measurement tool for measuring hand edema. This technique is a more clinically feasible tool than water volumetry in the burn patient population.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Water volumetry is considered the "gold standard" for hand edema assessment. This technique requires considerable time, staff, and specialized equipment. The figure-of-eight method for hand edema assessment has been tested only in the orthopedic population. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand edema in the burn patient population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective blinded study with 20 burned patients (33 edematous hands) admitted from February to May 2005. Two testers performed three separate blinded measurements on each edematous hand, using the figure-of-eight technique. A third tester performed two measurements, using water volumetry. An independent investigator recorded all measurements. Intratester and intertester reliability were analyzed. Concurrent validity was examined and compared with water volumetry measurements. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the intratester reliability of the figure-of-eight method were 0.96 for tester 1 and 0.97 for tester 2. The ICC for intertester reliability of the figure-of-eight measurements was 0.94. The intratester ICC for volumetric measurements was 0.99. Correlation coefficient (Pearson's) for tester 1 was 0.83 (P < .01), and for tester 2, 0.89 (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The figure-of-eight technique is a reliable and valid measurement tool for measuring hand edema. This technique is a more clinically feasible tool than water volumetry in the burn patient population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846128470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846128470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31802c9eb9

DO - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31802c9eb9

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 157

EP - 162

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 1

ER -