The rise and fall of levonorgestrel implants

1992-1996

Abbey Berenson, Constance M. Wiemann, Sharon L. McCombs, Ana Somma-Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess shifts over a 4-year period in attitudes of low- income US women regarding use of levonorgestrel implants. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered at two different points in time to English-speaking women of reproductive age seeking gynecologic or obstetric care in southeast Texas. The first survey, administered to 762 women in 1992, elicited information on demographic and reproductive characteristics, as well as exposure to information on implants and attitudes regarding use of this method. This same survey was administered again in 1995-1996 to 502 women. χ2, Student t, or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were used to evaluate shifts in attitudes and perceived barriers to use across the 4-year period. Results: Women portrayed less positive attitudes about levonorgestrel implants when surveyed in 1995-1996 as compared with 1992. Most notably, they appeared less appreciative of the convenience associated with implant use and more concerned with potential side effects. Nulliparous and parous women surveyed in 1995-1996 were significantly less likely than those surveyed in 1992 to state that they would consider using this method for birth control (P < .001) and were more likely to state that their partner, friends, and family would object to their use of levonorgestrel implants. Conclusion: This study documents the decline in popular perceptions of levonorgestrel implants among low-income English-speaking women over the 4-year period following the introduction of this contraceptive method to the US market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-794
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Levonorgestrel
Contraception
Obstetrics
Demography
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The rise and fall of levonorgestrel implants : 1992-1996. / Berenson, Abbey; Wiemann, Constance M.; McCombs, Sharon L.; Somma-Garcia, Ana.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 92, No. 5, 11.1998, p. 790-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berenson, Abbey ; Wiemann, Constance M. ; McCombs, Sharon L. ; Somma-Garcia, Ana. / The rise and fall of levonorgestrel implants : 1992-1996. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998 ; Vol. 92, No. 5. pp. 790-794.
@article{d4b2db10c1194d6b991d75b08a2784c5,
title = "The rise and fall of levonorgestrel implants: 1992-1996",
abstract = "Objective: To assess shifts over a 4-year period in attitudes of low- income US women regarding use of levonorgestrel implants. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered at two different points in time to English-speaking women of reproductive age seeking gynecologic or obstetric care in southeast Texas. The first survey, administered to 762 women in 1992, elicited information on demographic and reproductive characteristics, as well as exposure to information on implants and attitudes regarding use of this method. This same survey was administered again in 1995-1996 to 502 women. χ2, Student t, or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were used to evaluate shifts in attitudes and perceived barriers to use across the 4-year period. Results: Women portrayed less positive attitudes about levonorgestrel implants when surveyed in 1995-1996 as compared with 1992. Most notably, they appeared less appreciative of the convenience associated with implant use and more concerned with potential side effects. Nulliparous and parous women surveyed in 1995-1996 were significantly less likely than those surveyed in 1992 to state that they would consider using this method for birth control (P < .001) and were more likely to state that their partner, friends, and family would object to their use of levonorgestrel implants. Conclusion: This study documents the decline in popular perceptions of levonorgestrel implants among low-income English-speaking women over the 4-year period following the introduction of this contraceptive method to the US market.",
author = "Abbey Berenson and Wiemann, {Constance M.} and McCombs, {Sharon L.} and Ana Somma-Garcia",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00311-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "790--794",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise and fall of levonorgestrel implants

T2 - 1992-1996

AU - Berenson, Abbey

AU - Wiemann, Constance M.

AU - McCombs, Sharon L.

AU - Somma-Garcia, Ana

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - Objective: To assess shifts over a 4-year period in attitudes of low- income US women regarding use of levonorgestrel implants. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered at two different points in time to English-speaking women of reproductive age seeking gynecologic or obstetric care in southeast Texas. The first survey, administered to 762 women in 1992, elicited information on demographic and reproductive characteristics, as well as exposure to information on implants and attitudes regarding use of this method. This same survey was administered again in 1995-1996 to 502 women. χ2, Student t, or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were used to evaluate shifts in attitudes and perceived barriers to use across the 4-year period. Results: Women portrayed less positive attitudes about levonorgestrel implants when surveyed in 1995-1996 as compared with 1992. Most notably, they appeared less appreciative of the convenience associated with implant use and more concerned with potential side effects. Nulliparous and parous women surveyed in 1995-1996 were significantly less likely than those surveyed in 1992 to state that they would consider using this method for birth control (P < .001) and were more likely to state that their partner, friends, and family would object to their use of levonorgestrel implants. Conclusion: This study documents the decline in popular perceptions of levonorgestrel implants among low-income English-speaking women over the 4-year period following the introduction of this contraceptive method to the US market.

AB - Objective: To assess shifts over a 4-year period in attitudes of low- income US women regarding use of levonorgestrel implants. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered at two different points in time to English-speaking women of reproductive age seeking gynecologic or obstetric care in southeast Texas. The first survey, administered to 762 women in 1992, elicited information on demographic and reproductive characteristics, as well as exposure to information on implants and attitudes regarding use of this method. This same survey was administered again in 1995-1996 to 502 women. χ2, Student t, or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were used to evaluate shifts in attitudes and perceived barriers to use across the 4-year period. Results: Women portrayed less positive attitudes about levonorgestrel implants when surveyed in 1995-1996 as compared with 1992. Most notably, they appeared less appreciative of the convenience associated with implant use and more concerned with potential side effects. Nulliparous and parous women surveyed in 1995-1996 were significantly less likely than those surveyed in 1992 to state that they would consider using this method for birth control (P < .001) and were more likely to state that their partner, friends, and family would object to their use of levonorgestrel implants. Conclusion: This study documents the decline in popular perceptions of levonorgestrel implants among low-income English-speaking women over the 4-year period following the introduction of this contraceptive method to the US market.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031764340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031764340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00311-1

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00311-1

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 790

EP - 794

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 5

ER -