Abstract
This study examined the difference between clinical impressions and autopsy findings in a group of patients dying on a university surgical service after blunt injury, penetrating injury, or thermal burns. Of 215 patients dying between the years 1984 and 1988, 212 were included in this study (autopsy rate, 98.6%). Major discrepancies in clinical diagnosis versus the anatomic diagnosis at autopsy were found to occur in approximately 30% of patients. The incidence of errors in diagnosis which may have impacted on survival in these groups of injured patients was quite low (5.1%). These data support the continued practice of obtaining autopsy in all patients dying from trauma. This information is clinically relevant, and, in today’s atmosphere of quality assurance, absolutely necessary for a modern trauma center.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1021-1025 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Trauma |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1990 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of autopsy in death resulting from trauma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS