The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections: an institutional experience

Bhavik N. Patel, Madeline Morgan, Douglas Tyler, Erik Paulson, Tracy A. Jaffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated intra-abdominal collections consisting entirely of gas. Materials and methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study analyzing patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections over an 8-year period was undertaken. Seven patients referred for percutaneous drainage were included. Size of collections, subsequent development of fluid, and microbiological yield were determined. Clinical outcome was also analyzed. Results: Out of 2835 patients referred for percutaneous drainage between 2004 and 2012, seven patients (5M, 2F; average age 63, range 54–85) met criteria for inclusion with CT showing air-only collections. Percutaneous drain placement (five 8 Fr, one 10 Fr, and one 12 Fr) using Seldinger technique was performed. Four patients (57%) had recently undergone surgery (2 Whipple, 1 colectomy, 1 hepatic resection) while two (29%) had a remote surgery (1 abdominoperineal resection, 1 sigmoidectomy). Despite the lack of detectable fluid on the original CT, 6 patients (86%) had air and fluid aspirated at drainage, 5 (83%) of the aspirates developed positive microbacterial cultures. Four patients (57%) presented with fever at the time of the initial scan, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Four patients (57%) had leukocytosis, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Conclusions: Although relatively rare in occurrence, patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections with signs of infection should be considered for percutaneous management similar to that of conventional infected fluid collections. Although fluid is not visible on CT, these collections can produce fluid that contains organisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3257-3264
Number of pages8
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume40
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2015

Fingerprint

Drainage
Air
Colectomy
Research Ethics Committees
Leukocytosis
Fever
Retrospective Studies
Gases
Liver
Infection

Keywords

  • Air collection
  • CT
  • Percutaneous drainage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections : an institutional experience. / Patel, Bhavik N.; Morgan, Madeline; Tyler, Douglas; Paulson, Erik; Jaffe, Tracy A.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 40, No. 8, 02.09.2015, p. 3257-3264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Bhavik N. ; Morgan, Madeline ; Tyler, Douglas ; Paulson, Erik ; Jaffe, Tracy A. / The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections : an institutional experience. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 8. pp. 3257-3264.
@article{1c7805f94400461a81d7552cfa0e79c3,
title = "The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections: an institutional experience",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated intra-abdominal collections consisting entirely of gas. Materials and methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study analyzing patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections over an 8-year period was undertaken. Seven patients referred for percutaneous drainage were included. Size of collections, subsequent development of fluid, and microbiological yield were determined. Clinical outcome was also analyzed. Results: Out of 2835 patients referred for percutaneous drainage between 2004 and 2012, seven patients (5M, 2F; average age 63, range 54–85) met criteria for inclusion with CT showing air-only collections. Percutaneous drain placement (five 8 Fr, one 10 Fr, and one 12 Fr) using Seldinger technique was performed. Four patients (57{\%}) had recently undergone surgery (2 Whipple, 1 colectomy, 1 hepatic resection) while two (29{\%}) had a remote surgery (1 abdominoperineal resection, 1 sigmoidectomy). Despite the lack of detectable fluid on the original CT, 6 patients (86{\%}) had air and fluid aspirated at drainage, 5 (83{\%}) of the aspirates developed positive microbacterial cultures. Four patients (57{\%}) presented with fever at the time of the initial scan, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Four patients (57{\%}) had leukocytosis, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Conclusions: Although relatively rare in occurrence, patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections with signs of infection should be considered for percutaneous management similar to that of conventional infected fluid collections. Although fluid is not visible on CT, these collections can produce fluid that contains organisms.",
keywords = "Air collection, CT, Percutaneous drainage",
author = "Patel, {Bhavik N.} and Madeline Morgan and Douglas Tyler and Erik Paulson and Jaffe, {Tracy A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-015-0537-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "3257--3264",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections

T2 - an institutional experience

AU - Patel, Bhavik N.

AU - Morgan, Madeline

AU - Tyler, Douglas

AU - Paulson, Erik

AU - Jaffe, Tracy A.

PY - 2015/9/2

Y1 - 2015/9/2

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated intra-abdominal collections consisting entirely of gas. Materials and methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study analyzing patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections over an 8-year period was undertaken. Seven patients referred for percutaneous drainage were included. Size of collections, subsequent development of fluid, and microbiological yield were determined. Clinical outcome was also analyzed. Results: Out of 2835 patients referred for percutaneous drainage between 2004 and 2012, seven patients (5M, 2F; average age 63, range 54–85) met criteria for inclusion with CT showing air-only collections. Percutaneous drain placement (five 8 Fr, one 10 Fr, and one 12 Fr) using Seldinger technique was performed. Four patients (57%) had recently undergone surgery (2 Whipple, 1 colectomy, 1 hepatic resection) while two (29%) had a remote surgery (1 abdominoperineal resection, 1 sigmoidectomy). Despite the lack of detectable fluid on the original CT, 6 patients (86%) had air and fluid aspirated at drainage, 5 (83%) of the aspirates developed positive microbacterial cultures. Four patients (57%) presented with fever at the time of the initial scan, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Four patients (57%) had leukocytosis, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Conclusions: Although relatively rare in occurrence, patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections with signs of infection should be considered for percutaneous management similar to that of conventional infected fluid collections. Although fluid is not visible on CT, these collections can produce fluid that contains organisms.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated intra-abdominal collections consisting entirely of gas. Materials and methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study analyzing patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections over an 8-year period was undertaken. Seven patients referred for percutaneous drainage were included. Size of collections, subsequent development of fluid, and microbiological yield were determined. Clinical outcome was also analyzed. Results: Out of 2835 patients referred for percutaneous drainage between 2004 and 2012, seven patients (5M, 2F; average age 63, range 54–85) met criteria for inclusion with CT showing air-only collections. Percutaneous drain placement (five 8 Fr, one 10 Fr, and one 12 Fr) using Seldinger technique was performed. Four patients (57%) had recently undergone surgery (2 Whipple, 1 colectomy, 1 hepatic resection) while two (29%) had a remote surgery (1 abdominoperineal resection, 1 sigmoidectomy). Despite the lack of detectable fluid on the original CT, 6 patients (86%) had air and fluid aspirated at drainage, 5 (83%) of the aspirates developed positive microbacterial cultures. Four patients (57%) presented with fever at the time of the initial scan, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Four patients (57%) had leukocytosis, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Conclusions: Although relatively rare in occurrence, patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections with signs of infection should be considered for percutaneous management similar to that of conventional infected fluid collections. Although fluid is not visible on CT, these collections can produce fluid that contains organisms.

KW - Air collection

KW - CT

KW - Percutaneous drainage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946472991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946472991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-015-0537-2

DO - 10.1007/s00261-015-0537-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 26329977

AN - SCOPUS:84946472991

VL - 40

SP - 3257

EP - 3264

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

IS - 8

ER -