The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills

Laura F. Romo, Abbey Berenson, Z. Helen Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess factors associated with hormonal emergency contraception (EC) awareness and acceptability among a sample of low-income Latino women receiving care in two university reproductive health clinics. A total of 297 Latino women, 18-43 years of age, completed a survey about EC awareness during a clinic visit, between January and May 2003. Those women with some degree of awareness (n = 73) also completed questions related to their acceptance of EC. Factors examined included language preference, demographic characteristics, pregnancy history, contraceptive use history and knowledge and concerns about EC usage. We found that only 41% of English-speaking and 17% of Spanish-speaking women had ever heard of EC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 6.4]. Among those aware of EC, unwillingness to use this method was associated with low levels of knowledge about the EC mechanism of action, but not about the EC regimen (adjusted OR = 0.5; CI: 0.3, 0.9). Specific misconceptions underlying their objections included the belief that women are more likely to get pregnant in the beginning of their cycle compared to the middle (unadjusted OR = 6.3; CI: 1.8, 22.6), and a belief that EC prevents implantation rather than ovulation (unadjusted OR = 5.7; CI: 1.2, 28.1). The extent to which the women considered EC to be morally wrong depended on their misconceptions about the EC mechanism, not on their religious background. The link between expressed moral concerns and incorrect knowledge coupled with its lack of association to religiosity suggests that enhanced education can help to alleviate moral objections, thereby increasing potential usage of EC to prevent unintended pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-235
Number of pages9
JournalContraception
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Postcoital Contraceptives
Postcoital Contraception
Hispanic Americans
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Reproductive History
Reproductive Health
Ambulatory Care
Ovulation

Keywords

  • Emergency contraceptive pills
  • Knowledge
  • Latina women
  • Misconceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills. / Romo, Laura F.; Berenson, Abbey; Wu, Z. Helen.

In: Contraception, Vol. 69, No. 3, 03.2004, p. 227-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a2a77bf47c74a228627f3bbbd0aba0c,
title = "The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to assess factors associated with hormonal emergency contraception (EC) awareness and acceptability among a sample of low-income Latino women receiving care in two university reproductive health clinics. A total of 297 Latino women, 18-43 years of age, completed a survey about EC awareness during a clinic visit, between January and May 2003. Those women with some degree of awareness (n = 73) also completed questions related to their acceptance of EC. Factors examined included language preference, demographic characteristics, pregnancy history, contraceptive use history and knowledge and concerns about EC usage. We found that only 41{\%} of English-speaking and 17{\%} of Spanish-speaking women had ever heard of EC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 6.4]. Among those aware of EC, unwillingness to use this method was associated with low levels of knowledge about the EC mechanism of action, but not about the EC regimen (adjusted OR = 0.5; CI: 0.3, 0.9). Specific misconceptions underlying their objections included the belief that women are more likely to get pregnant in the beginning of their cycle compared to the middle (unadjusted OR = 6.3; CI: 1.8, 22.6), and a belief that EC prevents implantation rather than ovulation (unadjusted OR = 5.7; CI: 1.2, 28.1). The extent to which the women considered EC to be morally wrong depended on their misconceptions about the EC mechanism, not on their religious background. The link between expressed moral concerns and incorrect knowledge coupled with its lack of association to religiosity suggests that enhanced education can help to alleviate moral objections, thereby increasing potential usage of EC to prevent unintended pregnancy.",
keywords = "Emergency contraceptive pills, Knowledge, Latina women, Misconceptions",
author = "Romo, {Laura F.} and Abbey Berenson and Wu, {Z. Helen}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2003.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "227--235",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of misconceptions on Latino women's acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills

AU - Romo, Laura F.

AU - Berenson, Abbey

AU - Wu, Z. Helen

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - The goal of this study was to assess factors associated with hormonal emergency contraception (EC) awareness and acceptability among a sample of low-income Latino women receiving care in two university reproductive health clinics. A total of 297 Latino women, 18-43 years of age, completed a survey about EC awareness during a clinic visit, between January and May 2003. Those women with some degree of awareness (n = 73) also completed questions related to their acceptance of EC. Factors examined included language preference, demographic characteristics, pregnancy history, contraceptive use history and knowledge and concerns about EC usage. We found that only 41% of English-speaking and 17% of Spanish-speaking women had ever heard of EC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 6.4]. Among those aware of EC, unwillingness to use this method was associated with low levels of knowledge about the EC mechanism of action, but not about the EC regimen (adjusted OR = 0.5; CI: 0.3, 0.9). Specific misconceptions underlying their objections included the belief that women are more likely to get pregnant in the beginning of their cycle compared to the middle (unadjusted OR = 6.3; CI: 1.8, 22.6), and a belief that EC prevents implantation rather than ovulation (unadjusted OR = 5.7; CI: 1.2, 28.1). The extent to which the women considered EC to be morally wrong depended on their misconceptions about the EC mechanism, not on their religious background. The link between expressed moral concerns and incorrect knowledge coupled with its lack of association to religiosity suggests that enhanced education can help to alleviate moral objections, thereby increasing potential usage of EC to prevent unintended pregnancy.

AB - The goal of this study was to assess factors associated with hormonal emergency contraception (EC) awareness and acceptability among a sample of low-income Latino women receiving care in two university reproductive health clinics. A total of 297 Latino women, 18-43 years of age, completed a survey about EC awareness during a clinic visit, between January and May 2003. Those women with some degree of awareness (n = 73) also completed questions related to their acceptance of EC. Factors examined included language preference, demographic characteristics, pregnancy history, contraceptive use history and knowledge and concerns about EC usage. We found that only 41% of English-speaking and 17% of Spanish-speaking women had ever heard of EC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 6.4]. Among those aware of EC, unwillingness to use this method was associated with low levels of knowledge about the EC mechanism of action, but not about the EC regimen (adjusted OR = 0.5; CI: 0.3, 0.9). Specific misconceptions underlying their objections included the belief that women are more likely to get pregnant in the beginning of their cycle compared to the middle (unadjusted OR = 6.3; CI: 1.8, 22.6), and a belief that EC prevents implantation rather than ovulation (unadjusted OR = 5.7; CI: 1.2, 28.1). The extent to which the women considered EC to be morally wrong depended on their misconceptions about the EC mechanism, not on their religious background. The link between expressed moral concerns and incorrect knowledge coupled with its lack of association to religiosity suggests that enhanced education can help to alleviate moral objections, thereby increasing potential usage of EC to prevent unintended pregnancy.

KW - Emergency contraceptive pills

KW - Knowledge

KW - Latina women

KW - Misconceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242306260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242306260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.10.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 14969671

AN - SCOPUS:1242306260

VL - 69

SP - 227

EP - 235

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 3

ER -