The State-of-the-Science

Access to Postacute Care Rehabilitation Services. A Review

Kenneth Ottenbacher, James E. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE. The state-of-the-science: access to postacute care rehabilitation services. A review. Objective: To identify and summarize potential factors that influence access to postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation services. Data Sources: Ovid Medline and agency-specific (eg, RAND Corp, Research Triangle Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) searches, using combinations of the terms health services accessibility, delivery of healthcare, access to care, post-acute, postacute, and access. Names of prominent authors were also searched to retrieve their relevant articles. Study Selection: The initial search resulted in 823 articles published between 1980 and 2006. After we reviewed titles and abstracts, we obtained and examined 49 potential sources. Our final sample of 35 studies had descriptions and/or analyses of measures that might serve as indictors of access to PAC settings. Data Extraction: Key information abstracted from each article and document included author(s), year of publication, patient groups, sample size, health care setting, and a brief summary of the access-related issues in PAC. Data Synthesis: Studies varied by patient group, care setting, and access categories. Indicators of access to PAC rehabilitation services were classified into 4 categories: financial (46%), personal (31%), structural (26%), and attitudinal (23%). Many studies assessed more than 1 category. Conclusions: We identified categories of information that can be used to develop a monitoring system for PAC services. The inclusion of access indicators in existing health report cards and quality indicator systems should be further explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1513-1521
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume88
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Subacute Care
Rehabilitation
Information Storage and Retrieval
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Delivery of Health Care
Health Services Accessibility
Sample Size
Names
Publications
Patient Care

Keywords

  • Delivery of health care
  • Disabled persons
  • Quality indicators
  • Rehabilitation
  • Review [publication type]

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The State-of-the-Science : Access to Postacute Care Rehabilitation Services. A Review. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Graham, James E.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 88, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 1513-1521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8546f662db7b4257bcf9dea37f8e1563,
title = "The State-of-the-Science: Access to Postacute Care Rehabilitation Services. A Review",
abstract = "Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE. The state-of-the-science: access to postacute care rehabilitation services. A review. Objective: To identify and summarize potential factors that influence access to postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation services. Data Sources: Ovid Medline and agency-specific (eg, RAND Corp, Research Triangle Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) searches, using combinations of the terms health services accessibility, delivery of healthcare, access to care, post-acute, postacute, and access. Names of prominent authors were also searched to retrieve their relevant articles. Study Selection: The initial search resulted in 823 articles published between 1980 and 2006. After we reviewed titles and abstracts, we obtained and examined 49 potential sources. Our final sample of 35 studies had descriptions and/or analyses of measures that might serve as indictors of access to PAC settings. Data Extraction: Key information abstracted from each article and document included author(s), year of publication, patient groups, sample size, health care setting, and a brief summary of the access-related issues in PAC. Data Synthesis: Studies varied by patient group, care setting, and access categories. Indicators of access to PAC rehabilitation services were classified into 4 categories: financial (46{\%}), personal (31{\%}), structural (26{\%}), and attitudinal (23{\%}). Many studies assessed more than 1 category. Conclusions: We identified categories of information that can be used to develop a monitoring system for PAC services. The inclusion of access indicators in existing health report cards and quality indicator systems should be further explored.",
keywords = "Delivery of health care, Disabled persons, Quality indicators, Rehabilitation, Review [publication type]",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and Graham, {James E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.761",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "1513--1521",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The State-of-the-Science

T2 - Access to Postacute Care Rehabilitation Services. A Review

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Graham, James E.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE. The state-of-the-science: access to postacute care rehabilitation services. A review. Objective: To identify and summarize potential factors that influence access to postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation services. Data Sources: Ovid Medline and agency-specific (eg, RAND Corp, Research Triangle Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) searches, using combinations of the terms health services accessibility, delivery of healthcare, access to care, post-acute, postacute, and access. Names of prominent authors were also searched to retrieve their relevant articles. Study Selection: The initial search resulted in 823 articles published between 1980 and 2006. After we reviewed titles and abstracts, we obtained and examined 49 potential sources. Our final sample of 35 studies had descriptions and/or analyses of measures that might serve as indictors of access to PAC settings. Data Extraction: Key information abstracted from each article and document included author(s), year of publication, patient groups, sample size, health care setting, and a brief summary of the access-related issues in PAC. Data Synthesis: Studies varied by patient group, care setting, and access categories. Indicators of access to PAC rehabilitation services were classified into 4 categories: financial (46%), personal (31%), structural (26%), and attitudinal (23%). Many studies assessed more than 1 category. Conclusions: We identified categories of information that can be used to develop a monitoring system for PAC services. The inclusion of access indicators in existing health report cards and quality indicator systems should be further explored.

AB - Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE. The state-of-the-science: access to postacute care rehabilitation services. A review. Objective: To identify and summarize potential factors that influence access to postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation services. Data Sources: Ovid Medline and agency-specific (eg, RAND Corp, Research Triangle Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) searches, using combinations of the terms health services accessibility, delivery of healthcare, access to care, post-acute, postacute, and access. Names of prominent authors were also searched to retrieve their relevant articles. Study Selection: The initial search resulted in 823 articles published between 1980 and 2006. After we reviewed titles and abstracts, we obtained and examined 49 potential sources. Our final sample of 35 studies had descriptions and/or analyses of measures that might serve as indictors of access to PAC settings. Data Extraction: Key information abstracted from each article and document included author(s), year of publication, patient groups, sample size, health care setting, and a brief summary of the access-related issues in PAC. Data Synthesis: Studies varied by patient group, care setting, and access categories. Indicators of access to PAC rehabilitation services were classified into 4 categories: financial (46%), personal (31%), structural (26%), and attitudinal (23%). Many studies assessed more than 1 category. Conclusions: We identified categories of information that can be used to develop a monitoring system for PAC services. The inclusion of access indicators in existing health report cards and quality indicator systems should be further explored.

KW - Delivery of health care

KW - Disabled persons

KW - Quality indicators

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Review [publication type]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448960261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448960261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.761

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.761

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1513

EP - 1521

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 11

ER -