The structure of cucumber mosaic virus and comparison to cowpea chlorotic mottle virus

T. J. Smith, E. Chase, T. Schmidt, K. L. Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

118 Scopus citations


The structure of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV; strain Fny) has been determined to a 3.2-Å resolution using X-ray crystallography. Despite the fact that CMV has only 19% capsid protein sequence identity (34% similarity) to cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV), the core structures of these two members of the Bromoviridae family are highly homologous. As suggested by a previous low-resolution structural study, the 305-Å diameter (maximum) of CMV is ~12 Å larger than that of CCMV. In CCMV, the structures of the A, B, and C subunits are nearly identical except in their N termini. In contrast, the structures of two loops in subunit A of CMV differ from those in B and C. These loops are 6 and 7 residues longer than the analogous regions in CCMV. Unlike that of CCMV, the capsid of CMV does not undergo swelling at pH 7.0 and is stable at pH 9.0. This may be partly due to the fact that the N termini of the B and C subunits form a unique bundle of six amphipathic helices oriented down into the virion core at the threefold axes. In addition, while CCMV has a cluster of aspartic acid residues at the quasi-threefold axis that are proposed to bind metal in a pH-dependent manner this cluster is replaced by complementing acids and bases in CMV. Finally, this structure clearly demonstrates that the residues important for aphid transmission lie at the outermost portion of the βH-βI loop and yields details of the portions of the virus that are hypothesized to mediate binding to aphid mouthparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7578-7586
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of virology
Issue number16
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Immunology
  • Insect Science
  • Virology


Dive into the research topics of 'The structure of cucumber mosaic virus and comparison to cowpea chlorotic mottle virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this