The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly

D. Masud, S. Norton, S. Smailes, O. Shelley, B. Philp, Peter Dziewulski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Burn in the elderly has a high mortality. Scoring systems incorporating age, and/or co-morbidities have been developed to assist in predicting outcomes in this high risk group. Life expectancy has increased in the general population and within the elderly age group medical co morbidity, physiological response to injury and socioeconomic factors give rise to the concept of biological versus chronological age. For a given age, baseline pre morbid state can vary. It is more valid to consider biological rather than chronological age when calculating risk. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, incorporating fitness, co-morbidities and level of dependence was used to analyse our elderly burn patients admitted to Burns ITU, their surgical management and one-year survival. Method: Data from patients with burns greater than 10% and aged over 65 years managed on the Burns ITU between 2005 and 2009 were obtained. A frailty score (1-7) was assigned to each patient based on the records of their admission assessment. 42 patients met the study criteria for analysis. 18 (42.9%) patients, with mean age 74.9 years (range 65-95 years) survived (S) their ITU stay and of these, 83.3% survived at 1 year. 24 (57.2%) patients, mean age 78.4 years (range 66-95 years) died (D) whilst on ITU. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, percentage burn (30% TBSA range 10-85%) (P > 0.05 using T Test) or inhalational injury (p > 0.05 using Z test). Using Mann-Whitney U test analysis, the frailty score between the two groups showed a significant difference at p = 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test = 78), median = 3 (S) and median = 5 (D). This suggests patients with better pre-morbid capacity, as evaluated by the frailty scoring system, were more likely to survive their burn insult and treatment. Significantly, more patients in the group that survived underwent surgical debridement (Mann-Whitney U test = 111, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Frailty scoring system appears to be a useful adjunct in predicting outcome in burns requiring admission to HDU/ITU in the senior population. The frailty score may predict which patients will benefit from surgery which also continues to be an important determinant of outcome in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-36
Number of pages7
JournalBurns
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Burns
Nonparametric Statistics
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries
Debridement
Life Expectancy
Population
Age Groups
Survival
Mortality
Health

Keywords

  • Burns morbidity
  • Burns mortality
  • Burns survival rate
  • Elderly burns
  • Elderly burns mortality
  • Frailty score
  • ITU burn care
  • Severe burns
  • Surgical debridement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Masud, D., Norton, S., Smailes, S., Shelley, O., Philp, B., & Dziewulski, P. (2013). The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly. Burns, 39(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.002

The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly. / Masud, D.; Norton, S.; Smailes, S.; Shelley, O.; Philp, B.; Dziewulski, Peter.

In: Burns, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 30-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Masud, D, Norton, S, Smailes, S, Shelley, O, Philp, B & Dziewulski, P 2013, 'The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly', Burns, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.002
Masud, D. ; Norton, S. ; Smailes, S. ; Shelley, O. ; Philp, B. ; Dziewulski, Peter. / The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly. In: Burns. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 30-36.
@article{00933013fb174f40a3b7cc7e20bbcc65,
title = "The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly",
abstract = "Introduction: Burn in the elderly has a high mortality. Scoring systems incorporating age, and/or co-morbidities have been developed to assist in predicting outcomes in this high risk group. Life expectancy has increased in the general population and within the elderly age group medical co morbidity, physiological response to injury and socioeconomic factors give rise to the concept of biological versus chronological age. For a given age, baseline pre morbid state can vary. It is more valid to consider biological rather than chronological age when calculating risk. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, incorporating fitness, co-morbidities and level of dependence was used to analyse our elderly burn patients admitted to Burns ITU, their surgical management and one-year survival. Method: Data from patients with burns greater than 10{\%} and aged over 65 years managed on the Burns ITU between 2005 and 2009 were obtained. A frailty score (1-7) was assigned to each patient based on the records of their admission assessment. 42 patients met the study criteria for analysis. 18 (42.9{\%}) patients, with mean age 74.9 years (range 65-95 years) survived (S) their ITU stay and of these, 83.3{\%} survived at 1 year. 24 (57.2{\%}) patients, mean age 78.4 years (range 66-95 years) died (D) whilst on ITU. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, percentage burn (30{\%} TBSA range 10-85{\%}) (P > 0.05 using T Test) or inhalational injury (p > 0.05 using Z test). Using Mann-Whitney U test analysis, the frailty score between the two groups showed a significant difference at p = 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test = 78), median = 3 (S) and median = 5 (D). This suggests patients with better pre-morbid capacity, as evaluated by the frailty scoring system, were more likely to survive their burn insult and treatment. Significantly, more patients in the group that survived underwent surgical debridement (Mann-Whitney U test = 111, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Frailty scoring system appears to be a useful adjunct in predicting outcome in burns requiring admission to HDU/ITU in the senior population. The frailty score may predict which patients will benefit from surgery which also continues to be an important determinant of outcome in these patients.",
keywords = "Burns morbidity, Burns mortality, Burns survival rate, Elderly burns, Elderly burns mortality, Frailty score, ITU burn care, Severe burns, Surgical debridement",
author = "D. Masud and S. Norton and S. Smailes and O. Shelley and B. Philp and Peter Dziewulski",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "30--36",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly

AU - Masud, D.

AU - Norton, S.

AU - Smailes, S.

AU - Shelley, O.

AU - Philp, B.

AU - Dziewulski, Peter

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Burn in the elderly has a high mortality. Scoring systems incorporating age, and/or co-morbidities have been developed to assist in predicting outcomes in this high risk group. Life expectancy has increased in the general population and within the elderly age group medical co morbidity, physiological response to injury and socioeconomic factors give rise to the concept of biological versus chronological age. For a given age, baseline pre morbid state can vary. It is more valid to consider biological rather than chronological age when calculating risk. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, incorporating fitness, co-morbidities and level of dependence was used to analyse our elderly burn patients admitted to Burns ITU, their surgical management and one-year survival. Method: Data from patients with burns greater than 10% and aged over 65 years managed on the Burns ITU between 2005 and 2009 were obtained. A frailty score (1-7) was assigned to each patient based on the records of their admission assessment. 42 patients met the study criteria for analysis. 18 (42.9%) patients, with mean age 74.9 years (range 65-95 years) survived (S) their ITU stay and of these, 83.3% survived at 1 year. 24 (57.2%) patients, mean age 78.4 years (range 66-95 years) died (D) whilst on ITU. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, percentage burn (30% TBSA range 10-85%) (P > 0.05 using T Test) or inhalational injury (p > 0.05 using Z test). Using Mann-Whitney U test analysis, the frailty score between the two groups showed a significant difference at p = 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test = 78), median = 3 (S) and median = 5 (D). This suggests patients with better pre-morbid capacity, as evaluated by the frailty scoring system, were more likely to survive their burn insult and treatment. Significantly, more patients in the group that survived underwent surgical debridement (Mann-Whitney U test = 111, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Frailty scoring system appears to be a useful adjunct in predicting outcome in burns requiring admission to HDU/ITU in the senior population. The frailty score may predict which patients will benefit from surgery which also continues to be an important determinant of outcome in these patients.

AB - Introduction: Burn in the elderly has a high mortality. Scoring systems incorporating age, and/or co-morbidities have been developed to assist in predicting outcomes in this high risk group. Life expectancy has increased in the general population and within the elderly age group medical co morbidity, physiological response to injury and socioeconomic factors give rise to the concept of biological versus chronological age. For a given age, baseline pre morbid state can vary. It is more valid to consider biological rather than chronological age when calculating risk. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, incorporating fitness, co-morbidities and level of dependence was used to analyse our elderly burn patients admitted to Burns ITU, their surgical management and one-year survival. Method: Data from patients with burns greater than 10% and aged over 65 years managed on the Burns ITU between 2005 and 2009 were obtained. A frailty score (1-7) was assigned to each patient based on the records of their admission assessment. 42 patients met the study criteria for analysis. 18 (42.9%) patients, with mean age 74.9 years (range 65-95 years) survived (S) their ITU stay and of these, 83.3% survived at 1 year. 24 (57.2%) patients, mean age 78.4 years (range 66-95 years) died (D) whilst on ITU. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, percentage burn (30% TBSA range 10-85%) (P > 0.05 using T Test) or inhalational injury (p > 0.05 using Z test). Using Mann-Whitney U test analysis, the frailty score between the two groups showed a significant difference at p = 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test = 78), median = 3 (S) and median = 5 (D). This suggests patients with better pre-morbid capacity, as evaluated by the frailty scoring system, were more likely to survive their burn insult and treatment. Significantly, more patients in the group that survived underwent surgical debridement (Mann-Whitney U test = 111, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Frailty scoring system appears to be a useful adjunct in predicting outcome in burns requiring admission to HDU/ITU in the senior population. The frailty score may predict which patients will benefit from surgery which also continues to be an important determinant of outcome in these patients.

KW - Burns morbidity

KW - Burns mortality

KW - Burns survival rate

KW - Elderly burns

KW - Elderly burns mortality

KW - Frailty score

KW - ITU burn care

KW - Severe burns

KW - Surgical debridement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872049341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872049341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 22575336

AN - SCOPUS:84872049341

VL - 39

SP - 30

EP - 36

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 1

ER -