The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: Evaluation of safety and efficacy

  • Michael G. Corneille
  • , Theresa M. Gallup
  • , Thomas Bening
  • , Steven E. Wolf
  • , Caitlin Brougher
  • , John G. Myers
  • , Daniel L. Dent
  • , Gabriel Medrano
  • , Elly Xenakis
  • , Ronald M. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery in pregnant women has become increasingly more common since the 1990s; however, the safety of laparoscopy in this population has been widely debated, particularly in emergent and urgent situations. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all pregnant women following a nonobstetric abdominal operation at a University hospital between 1993 and 2007. Perioperative morbidity and mortality for the mother and fetus were evaluated. Results: Ninety-four subjects were identified; 53 underwent laparoscopic procedures and 41 underwent open procedures. Cholecystectomy and appendectomy were performed in both groups with salpingectomy/ovarian cystectomy only in the laparoscopic group. No maternal deaths occurred, while fetal loss occurred in 3 cases within 7 days of the operation and in 1 case 7 weeks postoperatively. This and other perinatal complications occurred in 36.7% of the laparoscopic group and 41.7% of the open group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy appear to be as safe as the respective open procedures in pregnant patients; however, this population in particular remains at risk for perinatal complications regardless of the method of abdominal access.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-367
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume200
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Appendicitis
  • Cholecystitis
  • Laparoscopy
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy outcome
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: Evaluation of safety and efficacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this