The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey

Paul Wurzer, Hildegard Keil, Ludwik Branski, Daryousch Parvizi, Robert P. Clayton, Celeste Finnerty, David Herndon, Lars P. Kamolz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of our Internet survey was to assess the preferences of burn specialists who use skin substitutes in patients with burns covering 20% or more of their total body surface area (TBSA). Methods An open, voluntary Internet-based cross-sectional survey was performed. Responses to 19 noncompulsory questions, and participant career and location information were collected. Results One hundred eleven specialists from 36 countries responded to our questionnaire. Sixty participants were located in Europe (54%), followed by 31 (28%) in North America, 15 (14%) in Asia, three (3%) in South America, one (1%) in Africa, and one (1%) in Australia. The importance of skin substitutes in medium-sized burns (covering 20%-60% TBSA) was rated as "essential" by 28% and "desirable" by 56% of the respondents. In severe burns >60% of TBSA, 81% of responders rated the use of skin substitutes as "essential" and 14% as "desirable". Skin substitutes were used in daily clinical practice by 96% of all participants. Biological and synthetic dressings were used by 53%. A majority (86%) think that biological dressings do not pose a risk to patients. Allografts represent the most frequently used wound coverage (51%), followed by xenografts (28%). All participants of the survey indicated that as of yet, there is no ideal skin substitute available. Conclusions Split-thickness autografts still represent the most used wound cover for definitive treatment of severe burns. However, creation and implementation of an ideal skin substitute have yet to be achieved and therefore should be the focus of future work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-298
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume201
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Artificial Skin
Burns
Body Surface Area
Biological Dressings
Internet
South America
Autografts
Wounds and Injuries
North America
Heterografts
Allografts
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Allograft
  • Autograft
  • Burn injury
  • Internet survey
  • Skin substitute
  • Total body surface area
  • Xenograft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey. / Wurzer, Paul; Keil, Hildegard; Branski, Ludwik; Parvizi, Daryousch; Clayton, Robert P.; Finnerty, Celeste; Herndon, David; Kamolz, Lars P.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 201, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 293-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wurzer, P, Keil, H, Branski, L, Parvizi, D, Clayton, RP, Finnerty, C, Herndon, D & Kamolz, LP 2016, 'The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey', Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.048
Wurzer, Paul ; Keil, Hildegard ; Branski, Ludwik ; Parvizi, Daryousch ; Clayton, Robert P. ; Finnerty, Celeste ; Herndon, David ; Kamolz, Lars P. / The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2016 ; Vol. 201, No. 2. pp. 293-298.
@article{d288bc54e54d48f0aaa97c0d34396913,
title = "The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey",
abstract = "Objective The aim of our Internet survey was to assess the preferences of burn specialists who use skin substitutes in patients with burns covering 20{\%} or more of their total body surface area (TBSA). Methods An open, voluntary Internet-based cross-sectional survey was performed. Responses to 19 noncompulsory questions, and participant career and location information were collected. Results One hundred eleven specialists from 36 countries responded to our questionnaire. Sixty participants were located in Europe (54{\%}), followed by 31 (28{\%}) in North America, 15 (14{\%}) in Asia, three (3{\%}) in South America, one (1{\%}) in Africa, and one (1{\%}) in Australia. The importance of skin substitutes in medium-sized burns (covering 20{\%}-60{\%} TBSA) was rated as {"}essential{"} by 28{\%} and {"}desirable{"} by 56{\%} of the respondents. In severe burns >60{\%} of TBSA, 81{\%} of responders rated the use of skin substitutes as {"}essential{"} and 14{\%} as {"}desirable{"}. Skin substitutes were used in daily clinical practice by 96{\%} of all participants. Biological and synthetic dressings were used by 53{\%}. A majority (86{\%}) think that biological dressings do not pose a risk to patients. Allografts represent the most frequently used wound coverage (51{\%}), followed by xenografts (28{\%}). All participants of the survey indicated that as of yet, there is no ideal skin substitute available. Conclusions Split-thickness autografts still represent the most used wound cover for definitive treatment of severe burns. However, creation and implementation of an ideal skin substitute have yet to be achieved and therefore should be the focus of future work.",
keywords = "Allograft, Autograft, Burn injury, Internet survey, Skin substitute, Total body surface area, Xenograft",
author = "Paul Wurzer and Hildegard Keil and Ludwik Branski and Daryousch Parvizi and Clayton, {Robert P.} and Celeste Finnerty and David Herndon and Kamolz, {Lars P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "293--298",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of skin substitutes and burn care - A survey

AU - Wurzer, Paul

AU - Keil, Hildegard

AU - Branski, Ludwik

AU - Parvizi, Daryousch

AU - Clayton, Robert P.

AU - Finnerty, Celeste

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Kamolz, Lars P.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective The aim of our Internet survey was to assess the preferences of burn specialists who use skin substitutes in patients with burns covering 20% or more of their total body surface area (TBSA). Methods An open, voluntary Internet-based cross-sectional survey was performed. Responses to 19 noncompulsory questions, and participant career and location information were collected. Results One hundred eleven specialists from 36 countries responded to our questionnaire. Sixty participants were located in Europe (54%), followed by 31 (28%) in North America, 15 (14%) in Asia, three (3%) in South America, one (1%) in Africa, and one (1%) in Australia. The importance of skin substitutes in medium-sized burns (covering 20%-60% TBSA) was rated as "essential" by 28% and "desirable" by 56% of the respondents. In severe burns >60% of TBSA, 81% of responders rated the use of skin substitutes as "essential" and 14% as "desirable". Skin substitutes were used in daily clinical practice by 96% of all participants. Biological and synthetic dressings were used by 53%. A majority (86%) think that biological dressings do not pose a risk to patients. Allografts represent the most frequently used wound coverage (51%), followed by xenografts (28%). All participants of the survey indicated that as of yet, there is no ideal skin substitute available. Conclusions Split-thickness autografts still represent the most used wound cover for definitive treatment of severe burns. However, creation and implementation of an ideal skin substitute have yet to be achieved and therefore should be the focus of future work.

AB - Objective The aim of our Internet survey was to assess the preferences of burn specialists who use skin substitutes in patients with burns covering 20% or more of their total body surface area (TBSA). Methods An open, voluntary Internet-based cross-sectional survey was performed. Responses to 19 noncompulsory questions, and participant career and location information were collected. Results One hundred eleven specialists from 36 countries responded to our questionnaire. Sixty participants were located in Europe (54%), followed by 31 (28%) in North America, 15 (14%) in Asia, three (3%) in South America, one (1%) in Africa, and one (1%) in Australia. The importance of skin substitutes in medium-sized burns (covering 20%-60% TBSA) was rated as "essential" by 28% and "desirable" by 56% of the respondents. In severe burns >60% of TBSA, 81% of responders rated the use of skin substitutes as "essential" and 14% as "desirable". Skin substitutes were used in daily clinical practice by 96% of all participants. Biological and synthetic dressings were used by 53%. A majority (86%) think that biological dressings do not pose a risk to patients. Allografts represent the most frequently used wound coverage (51%), followed by xenografts (28%). All participants of the survey indicated that as of yet, there is no ideal skin substitute available. Conclusions Split-thickness autografts still represent the most used wound cover for definitive treatment of severe burns. However, creation and implementation of an ideal skin substitute have yet to be achieved and therefore should be the focus of future work.

KW - Allograft

KW - Autograft

KW - Burn injury

KW - Internet survey

KW - Skin substitute

KW - Total body surface area

KW - Xenograft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960853670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960853670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.048

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 27020810

AN - SCOPUS:84960853670

VL - 201

SP - 293

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 2

ER -