The use of the Cortrak Enteral Access System™ for post-pyloric (PP) feeding tube placement in a Burns Intensive Care Unit

S. J. Hemington-Gorse, N. N. Sheppard, R. Martin, O. Shelley, B. Philp, Peter Dziewulski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: 50% of critically ill patients fail to reach caloric targets with NG feeding. PP feeding may enhance caloric intake. PP feeding can be continued throughout theatre in patients with a secure airway. Blind PP tube placement is difficult. CEAS has been developed to assist tube placement and eliminate check X-rays of tube position. Method: All BITU patients with CEAS PP feeding tube placement were identified. Notes and X-rays were reviewed. Tube position, calorie deficit and time off feed were recorded. Results: 44 tubes were placed in 21 patients using CEAS. 84% were PP, 16% NG. Position correlated to X-ray findings in 86%. In 16% position was NG on CEAS but was PP on X-ray. 10 patients required both CXR and AXR to confirm position, the remainder required CXR only. Time off feed varied from 0-24 h (mean 7.4 h). Calorie deficit ranged from 0-2465 kCal (mean 858 kCal). Average wait for X-ray was 3.4 h. If X-ray wait was eliminated calorie deficit would be reduced by 45% to 393 kCal. Conclusion: The Cortrak system is safe and effective on BITU. It reduces calorie deficit, reduces X-ray exposure and is cost effective. We recommend its use on BITU.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-280
Number of pages4
JournalBurns
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Enteral Nutrition
Burns
Small Intestine
Intensive Care Units
X-Rays
Energy Intake
Critical Illness
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cortrak System™
  • Nutrition
  • Post-pyloric feeding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The use of the Cortrak Enteral Access System™ for post-pyloric (PP) feeding tube placement in a Burns Intensive Care Unit. / Hemington-Gorse, S. J.; Sheppard, N. N.; Martin, R.; Shelley, O.; Philp, B.; Dziewulski, Peter.

In: Burns, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.2011, p. 277-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hemington-Gorse, S. J. ; Sheppard, N. N. ; Martin, R. ; Shelley, O. ; Philp, B. ; Dziewulski, Peter. / The use of the Cortrak Enteral Access System™ for post-pyloric (PP) feeding tube placement in a Burns Intensive Care Unit. In: Burns. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 277-280.
@article{7f41dbd8562e4dcda22cda6c13839932,
title = "The use of the Cortrak Enteral Access System™ for post-pyloric (PP) feeding tube placement in a Burns Intensive Care Unit",
abstract = "Introduction: 50{\%} of critically ill patients fail to reach caloric targets with NG feeding. PP feeding may enhance caloric intake. PP feeding can be continued throughout theatre in patients with a secure airway. Blind PP tube placement is difficult. CEAS has been developed to assist tube placement and eliminate check X-rays of tube position. Method: All BITU patients with CEAS PP feeding tube placement were identified. Notes and X-rays were reviewed. Tube position, calorie deficit and time off feed were recorded. Results: 44 tubes were placed in 21 patients using CEAS. 84{\%} were PP, 16{\%} NG. Position correlated to X-ray findings in 86{\%}. In 16{\%} position was NG on CEAS but was PP on X-ray. 10 patients required both CXR and AXR to confirm position, the remainder required CXR only. Time off feed varied from 0-24 h (mean 7.4 h). Calorie deficit ranged from 0-2465 kCal (mean 858 kCal). Average wait for X-ray was 3.4 h. If X-ray wait was eliminated calorie deficit would be reduced by 45{\%} to 393 kCal. Conclusion: The Cortrak system is safe and effective on BITU. It reduces calorie deficit, reduces X-ray exposure and is cost effective. We recommend its use on BITU.",
keywords = "Cortrak System™, Nutrition, Post-pyloric feeding",
author = "Hemington-Gorse, {S. J.} and Sheppard, {N. N.} and R. Martin and O. Shelley and B. Philp and Peter Dziewulski",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "277--280",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the Cortrak Enteral Access System™ for post-pyloric (PP) feeding tube placement in a Burns Intensive Care Unit

AU - Hemington-Gorse, S. J.

AU - Sheppard, N. N.

AU - Martin, R.

AU - Shelley, O.

AU - Philp, B.

AU - Dziewulski, Peter

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Introduction: 50% of critically ill patients fail to reach caloric targets with NG feeding. PP feeding may enhance caloric intake. PP feeding can be continued throughout theatre in patients with a secure airway. Blind PP tube placement is difficult. CEAS has been developed to assist tube placement and eliminate check X-rays of tube position. Method: All BITU patients with CEAS PP feeding tube placement were identified. Notes and X-rays were reviewed. Tube position, calorie deficit and time off feed were recorded. Results: 44 tubes were placed in 21 patients using CEAS. 84% were PP, 16% NG. Position correlated to X-ray findings in 86%. In 16% position was NG on CEAS but was PP on X-ray. 10 patients required both CXR and AXR to confirm position, the remainder required CXR only. Time off feed varied from 0-24 h (mean 7.4 h). Calorie deficit ranged from 0-2465 kCal (mean 858 kCal). Average wait for X-ray was 3.4 h. If X-ray wait was eliminated calorie deficit would be reduced by 45% to 393 kCal. Conclusion: The Cortrak system is safe and effective on BITU. It reduces calorie deficit, reduces X-ray exposure and is cost effective. We recommend its use on BITU.

AB - Introduction: 50% of critically ill patients fail to reach caloric targets with NG feeding. PP feeding may enhance caloric intake. PP feeding can be continued throughout theatre in patients with a secure airway. Blind PP tube placement is difficult. CEAS has been developed to assist tube placement and eliminate check X-rays of tube position. Method: All BITU patients with CEAS PP feeding tube placement were identified. Notes and X-rays were reviewed. Tube position, calorie deficit and time off feed were recorded. Results: 44 tubes were placed in 21 patients using CEAS. 84% were PP, 16% NG. Position correlated to X-ray findings in 86%. In 16% position was NG on CEAS but was PP on X-ray. 10 patients required both CXR and AXR to confirm position, the remainder required CXR only. Time off feed varied from 0-24 h (mean 7.4 h). Calorie deficit ranged from 0-2465 kCal (mean 858 kCal). Average wait for X-ray was 3.4 h. If X-ray wait was eliminated calorie deficit would be reduced by 45% to 393 kCal. Conclusion: The Cortrak system is safe and effective on BITU. It reduces calorie deficit, reduces X-ray exposure and is cost effective. We recommend its use on BITU.

KW - Cortrak System™

KW - Nutrition

KW - Post-pyloric feeding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551612717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551612717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 21115294

AN - SCOPUS:79551612717

VL - 37

SP - 277

EP - 280

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 2

ER -