The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study

Emily E. Hadley, Virginia Rauth, Ana Rodriguez, Mostafa Borahay, Kristofer Jennings, Pooja Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare microsurgical loupes to traditional colposcopes with regard to physician comfort, efficiency and accuracy in performing colposcopy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Colposcopy was performed using microsurgical loupes and traditional colposcopes on the same set of patients. Time to completion, biopsies to be taken, and comfort level associated with examination for each method were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study. It took significantly less time to evaluate the cervix with loupes (mean: 72.4 ± 39.7 seconds) compared to the colposcope (102.3 ± 48.9 seconds; P < 0.001). The comfort level for using loupes was better than that for colposcopes (2.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The probability that the lesions to be biopsied matched for both modalities was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical loupes have comparable accuracy to traditional colposcopes, but with shorter exam time and better comfort for the provider.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-132
JournalJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2014


  • Colposcopy
  • Cervical dysplasia
  • Cervical cancer screening


Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this