The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study

Emily E. Hadley, Virginia Rauth, Ana Rodriguez, Mostafa Borahay, Kristofer Jennings, Pooja Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare microsurgical loupes to traditional colposcopes with regard to physician comfort, efficiency and accuracy in performing colposcopy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Colposcopy was performed using microsurgical loupes and traditional colposcopes on the same set of patients. Time to completion, biopsies to be taken, and comfort level associated with examination for each method were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study. It took significantly less time to evaluate the cervix with loupes (mean: 72.4 ± 39.7 seconds) compared to the colposcope (102.3 ± 48.9 seconds; P < 0.001). The comfort level for using loupes was better than that for colposcopes (2.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The probability that the lesions to be biopsied matched for both modalities was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical loupes have comparable accuracy to traditional colposcopes, but with shorter exam time and better comfort for the provider.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-132
JournalJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume3
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Colposcopes
Colposcopy
Cervix Uteri
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Physicians
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Colposcopy
  • Cervical dysplasia
  • Cervical cancer screening

Cite this

The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study. / Hadley, Emily E.; Rauth, Virginia; Rodriguez, Ana; Borahay, Mostafa; Jennings, Kristofer; Patel, Pooja.

In: Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2014, p. 129-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hadley, Emily E. ; Rauth, Virginia ; Rodriguez, Ana ; Borahay, Mostafa ; Jennings, Kristofer ; Patel, Pooja. / The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study. In: Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 129-132.
@article{02f160bd396444c6aca81bde255e0dc0,
title = "The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare microsurgical loupes to traditional colposcopes with regard to physician comfort, efficiency and accuracy in performing colposcopy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Colposcopy was performed using microsurgical loupes and traditional colposcopes on the same set of patients. Time to completion, biopsies to be taken, and comfort level associated with examination for each method were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study. It took significantly less time to evaluate the cervix with loupes (mean: 72.4 ± 39.7 seconds) compared to the colposcope (102.3 ± 48.9 seconds; P < 0.001). The comfort level for using loupes was better than that for colposcopes (2.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The probability that the lesions to be biopsied matched for both modalities was 0.90 (95{\%} CI: 0.81 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical loupes have comparable accuracy to traditional colposcopes, but with shorter exam time and better comfort for the provider.",
keywords = "Colposcopy, Cervical dysplasia, Cervical cancer screening",
author = "Hadley, {Emily E.} and Virginia Rauth and Ana Rodriguez and Mostafa Borahay and Kristofer Jennings and Pooja Patel",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "129--132",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "1927-128X",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of microsurgical loupes in performing colposcopy: A pilot study

AU - Hadley, Emily E.

AU - Rauth, Virginia

AU - Rodriguez, Ana

AU - Borahay, Mostafa

AU - Jennings, Kristofer

AU - Patel, Pooja

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare microsurgical loupes to traditional colposcopes with regard to physician comfort, efficiency and accuracy in performing colposcopy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Colposcopy was performed using microsurgical loupes and traditional colposcopes on the same set of patients. Time to completion, biopsies to be taken, and comfort level associated with examination for each method were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study. It took significantly less time to evaluate the cervix with loupes (mean: 72.4 ± 39.7 seconds) compared to the colposcope (102.3 ± 48.9 seconds; P < 0.001). The comfort level for using loupes was better than that for colposcopes (2.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The probability that the lesions to be biopsied matched for both modalities was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical loupes have comparable accuracy to traditional colposcopes, but with shorter exam time and better comfort for the provider.

AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare microsurgical loupes to traditional colposcopes with regard to physician comfort, efficiency and accuracy in performing colposcopy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Colposcopy was performed using microsurgical loupes and traditional colposcopes on the same set of patients. Time to completion, biopsies to be taken, and comfort level associated with examination for each method were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this study. It took significantly less time to evaluate the cervix with loupes (mean: 72.4 ± 39.7 seconds) compared to the colposcope (102.3 ± 48.9 seconds; P < 0.001). The comfort level for using loupes was better than that for colposcopes (2.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The probability that the lesions to be biopsied matched for both modalities was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical loupes have comparable accuracy to traditional colposcopes, but with shorter exam time and better comfort for the provider.

KW - Colposcopy

KW - Cervical dysplasia

KW - Cervical cancer screening

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 129

EP - 132

JO - Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 1927-128X

IS - 4

ER -