The validity of cervical dilation as an indication of true labor between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation

Sangeeta Jain, Angela Earhart, Nicole Ruddock, Tony Wen, Gary Hankins, George Saade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Cervical dilation with regular contraction traditionally has been used to differentiate between true and false labor. This diagnostic criterion has not been tested as most patients receive tocolytics. Our objective was to determine the time from admission to delivery in women with preterm contractions and advanced cervical dilation without tocolytics. Study Design: We reviewed the records of patients with preterm labor on the basis of regular contractions and cervical dilation ≥3 cm between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Chi-square analysis was performed for delivery at >1 week. Results: In the records, 68.8% of the patients remained pregnant at >1 week without tocolysis. Between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, the use of tocolysis did not help to prolong pregnancy >1 week (81% vs 88%; α = .05; power = 0.65). Conclusion: Cervical dilation with preterm contraction cannot be used as an indication of true labor. More accurate methods to diagnose true preterm labor and direct management decisions are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume197
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Dilatation
Tocolytic Agents
Tocolysis
Pregnancy
Premature Obstetric Labor

Keywords

  • cervical dilation
  • delivery
  • preterm labor
  • tocolysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The validity of cervical dilation as an indication of true labor between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. / Jain, Sangeeta; Earhart, Angela; Ruddock, Nicole; Wen, Tony; Hankins, Gary; Saade, George.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 197, No. 4, 10.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6ae83ab942743189dc9c9d2a2b4477c,
title = "The validity of cervical dilation as an indication of true labor between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation",
abstract = "Objective: Cervical dilation with regular contraction traditionally has been used to differentiate between true and false labor. This diagnostic criterion has not been tested as most patients receive tocolytics. Our objective was to determine the time from admission to delivery in women with preterm contractions and advanced cervical dilation without tocolytics. Study Design: We reviewed the records of patients with preterm labor on the basis of regular contractions and cervical dilation ≥3 cm between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Chi-square analysis was performed for delivery at >1 week. Results: In the records, 68.8{\%} of the patients remained pregnant at >1 week without tocolysis. Between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, the use of tocolysis did not help to prolong pregnancy >1 week (81{\%} vs 88{\%}; α = .05; power = 0.65). Conclusion: Cervical dilation with preterm contraction cannot be used as an indication of true labor. More accurate methods to diagnose true preterm labor and direct management decisions are needed.",
keywords = "cervical dilation, delivery, preterm labor, tocolysis",
author = "Sangeeta Jain and Angela Earhart and Nicole Ruddock and Tony Wen and Gary Hankins and George Saade",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "197",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of cervical dilation as an indication of true labor between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation

AU - Jain, Sangeeta

AU - Earhart, Angela

AU - Ruddock, Nicole

AU - Wen, Tony

AU - Hankins, Gary

AU - Saade, George

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objective: Cervical dilation with regular contraction traditionally has been used to differentiate between true and false labor. This diagnostic criterion has not been tested as most patients receive tocolytics. Our objective was to determine the time from admission to delivery in women with preterm contractions and advanced cervical dilation without tocolytics. Study Design: We reviewed the records of patients with preterm labor on the basis of regular contractions and cervical dilation ≥3 cm between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Chi-square analysis was performed for delivery at >1 week. Results: In the records, 68.8% of the patients remained pregnant at >1 week without tocolysis. Between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, the use of tocolysis did not help to prolong pregnancy >1 week (81% vs 88%; α = .05; power = 0.65). Conclusion: Cervical dilation with preterm contraction cannot be used as an indication of true labor. More accurate methods to diagnose true preterm labor and direct management decisions are needed.

AB - Objective: Cervical dilation with regular contraction traditionally has been used to differentiate between true and false labor. This diagnostic criterion has not been tested as most patients receive tocolytics. Our objective was to determine the time from admission to delivery in women with preterm contractions and advanced cervical dilation without tocolytics. Study Design: We reviewed the records of patients with preterm labor on the basis of regular contractions and cervical dilation ≥3 cm between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Chi-square analysis was performed for delivery at >1 week. Results: In the records, 68.8% of the patients remained pregnant at >1 week without tocolysis. Between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, the use of tocolysis did not help to prolong pregnancy >1 week (81% vs 88%; α = .05; power = 0.65). Conclusion: Cervical dilation with preterm contraction cannot be used as an indication of true labor. More accurate methods to diagnose true preterm labor and direct management decisions are needed.

KW - cervical dilation

KW - delivery

KW - preterm labor

KW - tocolysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34648819926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34648819926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 197

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -