The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States

Elizabeth Arias, William S. Schauman, Karl Eschbach, Paul D. Sorlie, Eric Backlund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives This report present the results of an evaluation study of the validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States and its impact on race-and Hispanic origin-specific mortality estimates. Methods The National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) was used to evaluate death certificate classification of race and Hispanic origin by comparing deatcertificate with survey race-ethnicity classifications for a sample of decedents identified in NLMS. NLMS consists of a series of annual Current Population Survey files (1973 and 1978-1998) linked to death certificates for years 1979-1998. To identify and measure the effect of race-ethnicity misclassification on death certificates on mortality estimates, pooled 1999-2001 vital statistics mortality dataand population data from the 2000 census were used to estimate and compare observed and corrected (for death certificate misclassification) race-ethnicity specific death rates. Results Race and ethnicity reporting on the death certificate continues to be excellent for the white and black populations. It remains poor for the American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) population but is reasonably good for the Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander (API) populations. Decedent characteristics such as placeof residence and nativity have an important effect on the quality of reporting on the death certificate. The effects of misclassification on mortality estimates were most pronounced for the AIAN population, where correcting for misclassification reverses a large AIAN over white mortality advantage toa large disadvantage. Among the Hispanic and API populations, adjustment for death certificate misclassification did not significantly affect minority-majority mortality differentials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVital and Health Statistics, Series 2: Data Evaluation and Methods Research
Issue number148
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Death Certificates
Certificate
Hispanic Americans
Mortality
Misclassification
North American Indians
Population
Longitudinal Studies
Estimate
Vital Statistics
Census
Censuses
Annual
Reverse
Adjustment
Continue
Statistics
Series
Evaluate
Evaluation

Keywords

  • Death certificate
  • Death rates
  • Health disparities
  • Hispanic origin
  • Mortality
  • Racec

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Information Management
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States. / Arias, Elizabeth; Schauman, William S.; Eschbach, Karl; Sorlie, Paul D.; Backlund, Eric.

In: Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2: Data Evaluation and Methods Research, No. 148, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arias, Elizabeth ; Schauman, William S. ; Eschbach, Karl ; Sorlie, Paul D. ; Backlund, Eric. / The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States. In: Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2: Data Evaluation and Methods Research. 2012 ; No. 148.
@article{2f4a081c977f480b95c1ef614dd89b80,
title = "The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States",
abstract = "Objectives This report present the results of an evaluation study of the validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States and its impact on race-and Hispanic origin-specific mortality estimates. Methods The National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) was used to evaluate death certificate classification of race and Hispanic origin by comparing deatcertificate with survey race-ethnicity classifications for a sample of decedents identified in NLMS. NLMS consists of a series of annual Current Population Survey files (1973 and 1978-1998) linked to death certificates for years 1979-1998. To identify and measure the effect of race-ethnicity misclassification on death certificates on mortality estimates, pooled 1999-2001 vital statistics mortality dataand population data from the 2000 census were used to estimate and compare observed and corrected (for death certificate misclassification) race-ethnicity specific death rates. Results Race and ethnicity reporting on the death certificate continues to be excellent for the white and black populations. It remains poor for the American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) population but is reasonably good for the Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander (API) populations. Decedent characteristics such as placeof residence and nativity have an important effect on the quality of reporting on the death certificate. The effects of misclassification on mortality estimates were most pronounced for the AIAN population, where correcting for misclassification reverses a large AIAN over white mortality advantage toa large disadvantage. Among the Hispanic and API populations, adjustment for death certificate misclassification did not significantly affect minority-majority mortality differentials.",
keywords = "Death certificate, Death rates, Health disparities, Hispanic origin, Mortality, Racec",
author = "Elizabeth Arias and Schauman, {William S.} and Karl Eschbach and Sorlie, {Paul D.} and Eric Backlund",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research",
issn = "0083-2057",
publisher = "U.S. National Center for Health Statistics",
number = "148",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States

AU - Arias, Elizabeth

AU - Schauman, William S.

AU - Eschbach, Karl

AU - Sorlie, Paul D.

AU - Backlund, Eric

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objectives This report present the results of an evaluation study of the validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States and its impact on race-and Hispanic origin-specific mortality estimates. Methods The National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) was used to evaluate death certificate classification of race and Hispanic origin by comparing deatcertificate with survey race-ethnicity classifications for a sample of decedents identified in NLMS. NLMS consists of a series of annual Current Population Survey files (1973 and 1978-1998) linked to death certificates for years 1979-1998. To identify and measure the effect of race-ethnicity misclassification on death certificates on mortality estimates, pooled 1999-2001 vital statistics mortality dataand population data from the 2000 census were used to estimate and compare observed and corrected (for death certificate misclassification) race-ethnicity specific death rates. Results Race and ethnicity reporting on the death certificate continues to be excellent for the white and black populations. It remains poor for the American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) population but is reasonably good for the Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander (API) populations. Decedent characteristics such as placeof residence and nativity have an important effect on the quality of reporting on the death certificate. The effects of misclassification on mortality estimates were most pronounced for the AIAN population, where correcting for misclassification reverses a large AIAN over white mortality advantage toa large disadvantage. Among the Hispanic and API populations, adjustment for death certificate misclassification did not significantly affect minority-majority mortality differentials.

AB - Objectives This report present the results of an evaluation study of the validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States and its impact on race-and Hispanic origin-specific mortality estimates. Methods The National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) was used to evaluate death certificate classification of race and Hispanic origin by comparing deatcertificate with survey race-ethnicity classifications for a sample of decedents identified in NLMS. NLMS consists of a series of annual Current Population Survey files (1973 and 1978-1998) linked to death certificates for years 1979-1998. To identify and measure the effect of race-ethnicity misclassification on death certificates on mortality estimates, pooled 1999-2001 vital statistics mortality dataand population data from the 2000 census were used to estimate and compare observed and corrected (for death certificate misclassification) race-ethnicity specific death rates. Results Race and ethnicity reporting on the death certificate continues to be excellent for the white and black populations. It remains poor for the American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) population but is reasonably good for the Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander (API) populations. Decedent characteristics such as placeof residence and nativity have an important effect on the quality of reporting on the death certificate. The effects of misclassification on mortality estimates were most pronounced for the AIAN population, where correcting for misclassification reverses a large AIAN over white mortality advantage toa large disadvantage. Among the Hispanic and API populations, adjustment for death certificate misclassification did not significantly affect minority-majority mortality differentials.

KW - Death certificate

KW - Death rates

KW - Health disparities

KW - Hispanic origin

KW - Mortality

KW - Racec

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871628847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871628847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84871628847

JO - Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research

JF - Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research

SN - 0083-2057

IS - 148

ER -