Trajectories of Functional Change After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury

Bret Howrey, James E. Graham, Monique Pappadis, Carl V. Granger, Kenneth Ottenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine trajectories of functional recovery after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: A subset of individuals receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI from 2002 to 2010 who also had postdischarge measurement of functional independence (N=16,583). Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcomes Measures: Admission, discharge, and follow-up data were obtained from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. We used latent class mixture models to examine recovery trajectories for both cognitive and motor functioning as measured by the FIM instrument. Results: Latent class models identified 3 trajectories (low, medium, high) for both cognitive and motor FIM subscales. Factors associated with membership in the low cognition trajectory group included younger age, male sex, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid (vs commercial or other insurance), comorbid conditions, and greater duration from injury date to rehabilitation admission date. Factors associated with membership in the low motor trajectory group included older age, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid coverage, comorbid conditions, open head injury, and greater duration to admission. Conclusions: Standard approaches to assessing recovery patterns after TBI obscure differences between subgroups with trajectories that differ from the overall mean. Select demographic and clinical characteristics can help classify patients with TBI into distinct functional recovery trajectories, which can enhance both patient-centered care and quality improvement efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Medicaid
Medicare
Information Systems
Patient-Centered Care
Quality Improvement
Traumatic Brain Injury
Insurance
Craniocerebral Trauma
Cognition
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Recovery of function
  • Rehabilitation
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{9a7ffa3025d14b28906382b1298c71f5,
title = "Trajectories of Functional Change After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury",
abstract = "Objective: To examine trajectories of functional recovery after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: A subset of individuals receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI from 2002 to 2010 who also had postdischarge measurement of functional independence (N=16,583). Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcomes Measures: Admission, discharge, and follow-up data were obtained from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. We used latent class mixture models to examine recovery trajectories for both cognitive and motor functioning as measured by the FIM instrument. Results: Latent class models identified 3 trajectories (low, medium, high) for both cognitive and motor FIM subscales. Factors associated with membership in the low cognition trajectory group included younger age, male sex, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid (vs commercial or other insurance), comorbid conditions, and greater duration from injury date to rehabilitation admission date. Factors associated with membership in the low motor trajectory group included older age, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid coverage, comorbid conditions, open head injury, and greater duration to admission. Conclusions: Standard approaches to assessing recovery patterns after TBI obscure differences between subgroups with trajectories that differ from the overall mean. Select demographic and clinical characteristics can help classify patients with TBI into distinct functional recovery trajectories, which can enhance both patient-centered care and quality improvement efforts.",
keywords = "Recovery of function, Rehabilitation, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Bret Howrey and Graham, {James E.} and Monique Pappadis and Granger, {Carl V.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trajectories of Functional Change After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury

AU - Howrey, Bret

AU - Graham, James E.

AU - Pappadis, Monique

AU - Granger, Carl V.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: To examine trajectories of functional recovery after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: A subset of individuals receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI from 2002 to 2010 who also had postdischarge measurement of functional independence (N=16,583). Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcomes Measures: Admission, discharge, and follow-up data were obtained from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. We used latent class mixture models to examine recovery trajectories for both cognitive and motor functioning as measured by the FIM instrument. Results: Latent class models identified 3 trajectories (low, medium, high) for both cognitive and motor FIM subscales. Factors associated with membership in the low cognition trajectory group included younger age, male sex, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid (vs commercial or other insurance), comorbid conditions, and greater duration from injury date to rehabilitation admission date. Factors associated with membership in the low motor trajectory group included older age, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid coverage, comorbid conditions, open head injury, and greater duration to admission. Conclusions: Standard approaches to assessing recovery patterns after TBI obscure differences between subgroups with trajectories that differ from the overall mean. Select demographic and clinical characteristics can help classify patients with TBI into distinct functional recovery trajectories, which can enhance both patient-centered care and quality improvement efforts.

AB - Objective: To examine trajectories of functional recovery after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: A subset of individuals receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for TBI from 2002 to 2010 who also had postdischarge measurement of functional independence (N=16,583). Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcomes Measures: Admission, discharge, and follow-up data were obtained from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. We used latent class mixture models to examine recovery trajectories for both cognitive and motor functioning as measured by the FIM instrument. Results: Latent class models identified 3 trajectories (low, medium, high) for both cognitive and motor FIM subscales. Factors associated with membership in the low cognition trajectory group included younger age, male sex, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid (vs commercial or other insurance), comorbid conditions, and greater duration from injury date to rehabilitation admission date. Factors associated with membership in the low motor trajectory group included older age, racial/ethnic minority, Medicare or Medicaid coverage, comorbid conditions, open head injury, and greater duration to admission. Conclusions: Standard approaches to assessing recovery patterns after TBI obscure differences between subgroups with trajectories that differ from the overall mean. Select demographic and clinical characteristics can help classify patients with TBI into distinct functional recovery trajectories, which can enhance both patient-centered care and quality improvement efforts.

KW - Recovery of function

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019620622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019620622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.009

M3 - Article

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

ER -