TY - JOUR
T1 - Transperineal laser ablation of the prostate as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer
T2 - The results of a Delphi consensus project
AU - Cocci, Andrea
AU - Pezzoli, Marta
AU - Bianco, Fernando
AU - Blefari, Franco
AU - Bove, Pierluigi
AU - Cornud, Francois
AU - De Rienzo, Gaetano
AU - Destefanis, Paolo
AU - Di Trapani, Danilo
AU - Giacobbe, Alessandro
AU - Giovanessi, Luca
AU - Laganà, Antonino
AU - Lughezzani, Giovanni
AU - Manenti, Guglielmo
AU - Muto, Gianluca
AU - Patelli, Gianluigi
AU - Pinzi, Novello
AU - Regusci, Stefano
AU - Russo, Giorgio I.
AU - Salamanca, Juan I.M.
AU - Salvi, Matteo
AU - Silvestri, Luigi
AU - Verweij, Fabrizio
AU - Walser, Eric
AU - Bertolo, Riccardo G.
AU - Iacovelli, Valerio
AU - Bertaccini, Alessandro
AU - Marchiori, Debora
AU - Davila, Hugo
AU - Ditonno, Pasquale
AU - Gontero, Paolo
AU - Iapicca, Gennaro
AU - M De Reijke, Theo
AU - Ricapito, Vito
AU - Pellegrini, Pierluca
AU - Minervini, Andrea
AU - Serni, Sergio
AU - Sessa, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Objective: To evaluate transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) with Echolaser® (Echolaser® TPLA, Elesta S.p.A., Calenzano, Italy) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method. Methods: Italian and international experts on BPH and PCa participated in a collaborative consensus project. During two rounds, they expressed their opinions on Echolaser® TPLA for the treatment of BPH and PCa answering online questionnaires on indications, methodology, and potential complications of this technology. Level of agreement or disagreement to reach consensus was set at 75%. If the consensus was not achieved, questions were modified after each round. A final round was performed during an online meeting, in which results were discussed and finalized. Results: Thirty-two out of forty invited experts participated and consensus was reached on all topics. Agreement was achieved on recommending Echolaser® TPLA as a treatment of BPH in patients with ample range of prostate volume, from <40 mL (80%) to >80 mL (80%), comorbidities (100%), antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment (96%), indwelling catheter (77%), and strong will of preserving ejaculatory function (100%). Majority of respondents agreed that Echolaser® TPLA is a potential option for the treatment of localized PCa (78%) and recommended it for low-risk PCa (90%). During the final round, experts concluded that it can be used for intermediate-risk PCa and it should be proposed as an effective alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients with strong will of avoiding urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Almost all participants agreed that the transperineal approach of this organ-sparing technique is safer than transrectal and transurethral approaches typical of other techniques (97% of agreement among experts). Pre-procedural assessment, technical aspects, post-procedural catheterization, pharmacological therapy, and expected outcomes were discussed, leading to statements and recommendations. Conclusion: Echolaser® TPLA is a safe and effective procedure that treats BPH and localized PCa with satisfactory functional and sexual outcomes.
AB - Objective: To evaluate transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) with Echolaser® (Echolaser® TPLA, Elesta S.p.A., Calenzano, Italy) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method. Methods: Italian and international experts on BPH and PCa participated in a collaborative consensus project. During two rounds, they expressed their opinions on Echolaser® TPLA for the treatment of BPH and PCa answering online questionnaires on indications, methodology, and potential complications of this technology. Level of agreement or disagreement to reach consensus was set at 75%. If the consensus was not achieved, questions were modified after each round. A final round was performed during an online meeting, in which results were discussed and finalized. Results: Thirty-two out of forty invited experts participated and consensus was reached on all topics. Agreement was achieved on recommending Echolaser® TPLA as a treatment of BPH in patients with ample range of prostate volume, from <40 mL (80%) to >80 mL (80%), comorbidities (100%), antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment (96%), indwelling catheter (77%), and strong will of preserving ejaculatory function (100%). Majority of respondents agreed that Echolaser® TPLA is a potential option for the treatment of localized PCa (78%) and recommended it for low-risk PCa (90%). During the final round, experts concluded that it can be used for intermediate-risk PCa and it should be proposed as an effective alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients with strong will of avoiding urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Almost all participants agreed that the transperineal approach of this organ-sparing technique is safer than transrectal and transurethral approaches typical of other techniques (97% of agreement among experts). Pre-procedural assessment, technical aspects, post-procedural catheterization, pharmacological therapy, and expected outcomes were discussed, leading to statements and recommendations. Conclusion: Echolaser® TPLA is a safe and effective procedure that treats BPH and localized PCa with satisfactory functional and sexual outcomes.
KW - Benign prostatic hyperplasia
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Transperineal laser ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182988196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182988196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.07.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 38680587
AN - SCOPUS:85182988196
SN - 2214-3882
VL - 11
SP - 271
EP - 279
JO - Asian Journal of Urology
JF - Asian Journal of Urology
IS - 2
ER -