Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection

Taylor S. Riall, Karl A. Eschbach, Courtney Townsend, William H. Nealon, Jean L. Freeman, James Goodwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current recommendation is that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing >10 pancreatic resections annually. To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) in Texas. Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, we evaluated trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) from 1999 to 2004 and determined the factors that independently predicted resection at high-volume centers. A total of 3,189 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher at low-volume centers (7.4%) compared to high-volume centers (3.0%). Patients resected at high-volume centers increased from 54.5% in 1999 to 63.3% in 2004 (P∈=∈0.0004). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing less than five resections/year (35.5% to 26.0%). In a multivariate analysis, patients who were >75 (OR∈=∈0.51), female (OR∈=∈0.86), Hispanic (OR∈=∈0.58), having emergent surgery (OR∈=∈0.39), diagnosed with periampullary cancer (OR∈=∈0.68), and living >75 mi from a high-volume center (OR∈=∈0.93 per 10-mi increase in distance, P∈<∈0.05 for all OR) were less likely to be resected at high-volume centers. The odds of being resected at a high-volume center increased 6% per year. Whereas regionalization of pancreatic resection at high-volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 37% of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low-volume centers, with more than 25% occurring at centers doing less than five per year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care, but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1242-1252
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Information Storage and Retrieval
Hospital Mortality
Hispanic Americans
Inpatients
Multivariate Analysis
Demography
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Pancreatic resection
  • Regionalization of care
  • Volume-outcome relationship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection. / Riall, Taylor S.; Eschbach, Karl A.; Townsend, Courtney; Nealon, William H.; Freeman, Jean L.; Goodwin, James.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 11, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 1242-1252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riall, Taylor S. ; Eschbach, Karl A. ; Townsend, Courtney ; Nealon, William H. ; Freeman, Jean L. ; Goodwin, James. / Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 11, No. 10. pp. 1242-1252.
@article{6e4a5e388f664df480ec5d1e18634c83,
title = "Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection",
abstract = "The current recommendation is that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing >10 pancreatic resections annually. To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) in Texas. Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, we evaluated trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) from 1999 to 2004 and determined the factors that independently predicted resection at high-volume centers. A total of 3,189 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher at low-volume centers (7.4{\%}) compared to high-volume centers (3.0{\%}). Patients resected at high-volume centers increased from 54.5{\%} in 1999 to 63.3{\%} in 2004 (P∈=∈0.0004). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing less than five resections/year (35.5{\%} to 26.0{\%}). In a multivariate analysis, patients who were >75 (OR∈=∈0.51), female (OR∈=∈0.86), Hispanic (OR∈=∈0.58), having emergent surgery (OR∈=∈0.39), diagnosed with periampullary cancer (OR∈=∈0.68), and living >75 mi from a high-volume center (OR∈=∈0.93 per 10-mi increase in distance, P∈<∈0.05 for all OR) were less likely to be resected at high-volume centers. The odds of being resected at a high-volume center increased 6{\%} per year. Whereas regionalization of pancreatic resection at high-volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 37{\%} of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low-volume centers, with more than 25{\%} occurring at centers doing less than five per year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care, but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.",
keywords = "Pancreatic resection, Regionalization of care, Volume-outcome relationship",
author = "Riall, {Taylor S.} and Eschbach, {Karl A.} and Courtney Townsend and Nealon, {William H.} and Freeman, {Jean L.} and James Goodwin",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-007-0245-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1242--1252",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection

AU - Riall, Taylor S.

AU - Eschbach, Karl A.

AU - Townsend, Courtney

AU - Nealon, William H.

AU - Freeman, Jean L.

AU - Goodwin, James

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - The current recommendation is that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing >10 pancreatic resections annually. To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) in Texas. Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, we evaluated trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) from 1999 to 2004 and determined the factors that independently predicted resection at high-volume centers. A total of 3,189 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher at low-volume centers (7.4%) compared to high-volume centers (3.0%). Patients resected at high-volume centers increased from 54.5% in 1999 to 63.3% in 2004 (P∈=∈0.0004). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing less than five resections/year (35.5% to 26.0%). In a multivariate analysis, patients who were >75 (OR∈=∈0.51), female (OR∈=∈0.86), Hispanic (OR∈=∈0.58), having emergent surgery (OR∈=∈0.39), diagnosed with periampullary cancer (OR∈=∈0.68), and living >75 mi from a high-volume center (OR∈=∈0.93 per 10-mi increase in distance, P∈<∈0.05 for all OR) were less likely to be resected at high-volume centers. The odds of being resected at a high-volume center increased 6% per year. Whereas regionalization of pancreatic resection at high-volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 37% of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low-volume centers, with more than 25% occurring at centers doing less than five per year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care, but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.

AB - The current recommendation is that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing >10 pancreatic resections annually. To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) in Texas. Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, we evaluated trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) from 1999 to 2004 and determined the factors that independently predicted resection at high-volume centers. A total of 3,189 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher at low-volume centers (7.4%) compared to high-volume centers (3.0%). Patients resected at high-volume centers increased from 54.5% in 1999 to 63.3% in 2004 (P∈=∈0.0004). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing less than five resections/year (35.5% to 26.0%). In a multivariate analysis, patients who were >75 (OR∈=∈0.51), female (OR∈=∈0.86), Hispanic (OR∈=∈0.58), having emergent surgery (OR∈=∈0.39), diagnosed with periampullary cancer (OR∈=∈0.68), and living >75 mi from a high-volume center (OR∈=∈0.93 per 10-mi increase in distance, P∈<∈0.05 for all OR) were less likely to be resected at high-volume centers. The odds of being resected at a high-volume center increased 6% per year. Whereas regionalization of pancreatic resection at high-volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 37% of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low-volume centers, with more than 25% occurring at centers doing less than five per year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care, but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.

KW - Pancreatic resection

KW - Regionalization of care

KW - Volume-outcome relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548554677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548554677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-007-0245-5

DO - 10.1007/s11605-007-0245-5

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1242

EP - 1252

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 10

ER -