Trial of an Intervention to Improve Acute Heart Failure Outcomes

Douglas S. Lee, Sharon E. Straus, Michael E. Farkouh, Peter C. Austin, Monica Taljaard, Alice Chong, Christine Fahim, Stephanie Poon, Peter Cram, Stuart Smith, Robert S. McKelvie, Liane Porepa, Michael Hartleib, Peter Mitoff, Robert M. Iwanochko, Andrea MacDougall, Steven Shadowitz, Howard Abrams, Esam Elbarasi, Jiming FangJacob A. Udell, Michael J. Schull, Susanna Mak, Heather J. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Patients with acute heart failure are frequently or systematically hospitalized, often because the risk of adverse events is uncertain and the options for rapid follow-up are inadequate. Whether the use of a strategy to support clinicians in making decisions about discharging or admitting patients, coupled with rapid follow-up in an outpatient clinic, would affect outcomes remains uncertain. Methods In a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial conducted in Ontario, Canada, we randomly assigned 10 hospitals to staggered start dates for one-way crossover from the control phase (usual care) to the intervention phase, which involved the use of a point-of-care algorithm to stratify patients with acute heart failure according to the risk of death. During the intervention phase, low-risk patients were discharged early (in ≤3 days) and received standardized outpatient care, and high-risk patients were admitted to the hospital. The coprimary outcomes were a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes within 30 days after presentation and the composite outcome within 20 months. Results A total of 5452 patients were enrolled in the trial (2972 during the control phase and 2480 during the intervention phase). Within 30 days, death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes occurred in 301 patients (12.1%) who were enrolled during the intervention phase and in 430 patients (14.5%) who were enrolled during the control phase (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.99; P=0.04). Within 20 months, the cumulative incidence of primary-outcome events was 54.4% (95% CI, 48.6 to 59.9) among patients who were enrolled during the intervention phase and 56.2% (95% CI, 54.2 to 58.1) among patients who were enrolled during the control phase (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99). Fewer than six deaths or hospitalizations for any cause occurred in low- or intermediate-risk patients before the first outpatient visit within 30 days after discharge. Conclusions Among patients with acute heart failure who were seeking emergency care, the use of a hospital-based strategy to support clinical decision making and rapid follow-up led to a lower risk of the composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes within 30 days than usual care. (Funded by the Ontario SPOR Support Unit and others; COACH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02674438.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-32
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume388
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 5 2023

Keywords

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiology General
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Heart Failure
  • Hospital-Based Clinical Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trial of an Intervention to Improve Acute Heart Failure Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this