TUGs into VUGs and friendly BUGs

Transforming the gracilis territory into the best secondary breast reconstructive option

Julie Park, Lee W T Alkureishi, David H. Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction remains controversial. Limitations of the gracilis myocutaneous flap, including volume, skin paddle reliability, and donor morbidity, have been addressed by several modifications, hereby expanding its role in the decision tree for autologous breast reconstruction. This report documents the authors' experience with gracilis flap breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with the free gracilis myocutaneous flap, including the transverse upper gracilis, vertical upper gracilis, and bilateral stacked vertical upper gracilis. Results: Twenty-two patients received gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Fourteen (63.6 percent) had previous attempted breast reconstructions. Indications for gracilis donor site were previous abdominoplasty/abdominal flap (n = 15, 68 percent), insufficient abdominal tissue (n = 6, 27 percent), and patient preference (n = 1, 5 percent). Six patients underwent bilateral reconstruction, and five underwent unilateral reconstruction with bilateral stacked gracilis flaps. The skin paddle was transverse in four flaps (12 percent) and vertical in 29 (88 percent). There was one flap loss (3 percent); there were two occurrences of fat necrosis (6 percent). There were two minor donor site dehiscences (6 percent), one infection (3 percent), and one seroma (3 percent). Conclusions: The free gracilis flap is a versatile option for patients undergoing breast reconstruction, particularly when the abdominal donor site is unavailable. The vertical pattern is the authors' preferred technique, as it avoids some of the problems associated with transverse patterns. Stacked flaps further expand the utility of this technique, which the authors regard as the best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-454
Number of pages8
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume136
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Breast
Myocutaneous Flap
Tissue Donors
Abdominoplasty
Fat Necrosis
Seroma
Decision Trees
Skin
Patient Preference
Free Tissue Flaps
Databases
Morbidity
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

TUGs into VUGs and friendly BUGs : Transforming the gracilis territory into the best secondary breast reconstructive option. / Park, Julie; Alkureishi, Lee W T; Song, David H.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 447-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc645451199a438584ea91ed6b56c1b8,
title = "TUGs into VUGs and friendly BUGs: Transforming the gracilis territory into the best secondary breast reconstructive option",
abstract = "Background: The best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction remains controversial. Limitations of the gracilis myocutaneous flap, including volume, skin paddle reliability, and donor morbidity, have been addressed by several modifications, hereby expanding its role in the decision tree for autologous breast reconstruction. This report documents the authors' experience with gracilis flap breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with the free gracilis myocutaneous flap, including the transverse upper gracilis, vertical upper gracilis, and bilateral stacked vertical upper gracilis. Results: Twenty-two patients received gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Fourteen (63.6 percent) had previous attempted breast reconstructions. Indications for gracilis donor site were previous abdominoplasty/abdominal flap (n = 15, 68 percent), insufficient abdominal tissue (n = 6, 27 percent), and patient preference (n = 1, 5 percent). Six patients underwent bilateral reconstruction, and five underwent unilateral reconstruction with bilateral stacked gracilis flaps. The skin paddle was transverse in four flaps (12 percent) and vertical in 29 (88 percent). There was one flap loss (3 percent); there were two occurrences of fat necrosis (6 percent). There were two minor donor site dehiscences (6 percent), one infection (3 percent), and one seroma (3 percent). Conclusions: The free gracilis flap is a versatile option for patients undergoing breast reconstruction, particularly when the abdominal donor site is unavailable. The vertical pattern is the authors' preferred technique, as it avoids some of the problems associated with transverse patterns. Stacked flaps further expand the utility of this technique, which the authors regard as the best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction.",
author = "Julie Park and Alkureishi, {Lee W T} and Song, {David H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000001557",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "447--454",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TUGs into VUGs and friendly BUGs

T2 - Transforming the gracilis territory into the best secondary breast reconstructive option

AU - Park, Julie

AU - Alkureishi, Lee W T

AU - Song, David H.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: The best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction remains controversial. Limitations of the gracilis myocutaneous flap, including volume, skin paddle reliability, and donor morbidity, have been addressed by several modifications, hereby expanding its role in the decision tree for autologous breast reconstruction. This report documents the authors' experience with gracilis flap breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with the free gracilis myocutaneous flap, including the transverse upper gracilis, vertical upper gracilis, and bilateral stacked vertical upper gracilis. Results: Twenty-two patients received gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Fourteen (63.6 percent) had previous attempted breast reconstructions. Indications for gracilis donor site were previous abdominoplasty/abdominal flap (n = 15, 68 percent), insufficient abdominal tissue (n = 6, 27 percent), and patient preference (n = 1, 5 percent). Six patients underwent bilateral reconstruction, and five underwent unilateral reconstruction with bilateral stacked gracilis flaps. The skin paddle was transverse in four flaps (12 percent) and vertical in 29 (88 percent). There was one flap loss (3 percent); there were two occurrences of fat necrosis (6 percent). There were two minor donor site dehiscences (6 percent), one infection (3 percent), and one seroma (3 percent). Conclusions: The free gracilis flap is a versatile option for patients undergoing breast reconstruction, particularly when the abdominal donor site is unavailable. The vertical pattern is the authors' preferred technique, as it avoids some of the problems associated with transverse patterns. Stacked flaps further expand the utility of this technique, which the authors regard as the best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction.

AB - Background: The best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction remains controversial. Limitations of the gracilis myocutaneous flap, including volume, skin paddle reliability, and donor morbidity, have been addressed by several modifications, hereby expanding its role in the decision tree for autologous breast reconstruction. This report documents the authors' experience with gracilis flap breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing breast reconstruction with the free gracilis myocutaneous flap, including the transverse upper gracilis, vertical upper gracilis, and bilateral stacked vertical upper gracilis. Results: Twenty-two patients received gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Fourteen (63.6 percent) had previous attempted breast reconstructions. Indications for gracilis donor site were previous abdominoplasty/abdominal flap (n = 15, 68 percent), insufficient abdominal tissue (n = 6, 27 percent), and patient preference (n = 1, 5 percent). Six patients underwent bilateral reconstruction, and five underwent unilateral reconstruction with bilateral stacked gracilis flaps. The skin paddle was transverse in four flaps (12 percent) and vertical in 29 (88 percent). There was one flap loss (3 percent); there were two occurrences of fat necrosis (6 percent). There were two minor donor site dehiscences (6 percent), one infection (3 percent), and one seroma (3 percent). Conclusions: The free gracilis flap is a versatile option for patients undergoing breast reconstruction, particularly when the abdominal donor site is unavailable. The vertical pattern is the authors' preferred technique, as it avoids some of the problems associated with transverse patterns. Stacked flaps further expand the utility of this technique, which the authors regard as the best secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940992425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940992425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001557

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001557

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 447

EP - 454

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -