Type and screen: A safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology

Ethel Patten, Jack B. Alperin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In September, 1979, the Transfusion Committee at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston implemented a preoperative blood ordering policy of type and screen (TS) for selected surgical procedures. During the first year in which this policy was in force, 2,301 TS requests were received, most of them for patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. During this time, requests for cross matching declined by 12% (28,863 to 25,283) despite a 3% increase in packed red blood cell and whole blood transfusions (11,282 to 11,629). The cross match /transfusion ratio fell from 2.55 to 2.17, and outdating of blood dropped 42% (446 to 260). In the 20 months since this policy was introduced, 4,334 TS requests have been processed. Of these, 211 were changed to cross matching by the patient's physician, but only 100 patients (2.3%) actually received transfusions. No untoward reactions were observed by transfusing blood before the results of the cross matching were known. We estimate a savings to patients of $164,920, and conclude that TS is safe and effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-567
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume142
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 1 1982

Fingerprint

Gynecology
Obstetrics
Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
Blood Transfusion
Erythrocytes
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Type and screen : A safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology. / Patten, Ethel; Alperin, Jack B.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 142, No. 5, 01.03.1982, p. 563-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b2b43fd30ff450eb8da74992ab065a8,
title = "Type and screen: A safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology",
abstract = "In September, 1979, the Transfusion Committee at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston implemented a preoperative blood ordering policy of type and screen (TS) for selected surgical procedures. During the first year in which this policy was in force, 2,301 TS requests were received, most of them for patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. During this time, requests for cross matching declined by 12{\%} (28,863 to 25,283) despite a 3{\%} increase in packed red blood cell and whole blood transfusions (11,282 to 11,629). The cross match /transfusion ratio fell from 2.55 to 2.17, and outdating of blood dropped 42{\%} (446 to 260). In the 20 months since this policy was introduced, 4,334 TS requests have been processed. Of these, 211 were changed to cross matching by the patient's physician, but only 100 patients (2.3{\%}) actually received transfusions. No untoward reactions were observed by transfusing blood before the results of the cross matching were known. We estimate a savings to patients of $164,920, and conclude that TS is safe and effective.",
author = "Ethel Patten and Alperin, {Jack B.}",
year = "1982",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "563--567",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Type and screen

T2 - A safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology

AU - Patten, Ethel

AU - Alperin, Jack B.

PY - 1982/3/1

Y1 - 1982/3/1

N2 - In September, 1979, the Transfusion Committee at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston implemented a preoperative blood ordering policy of type and screen (TS) for selected surgical procedures. During the first year in which this policy was in force, 2,301 TS requests were received, most of them for patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. During this time, requests for cross matching declined by 12% (28,863 to 25,283) despite a 3% increase in packed red blood cell and whole blood transfusions (11,282 to 11,629). The cross match /transfusion ratio fell from 2.55 to 2.17, and outdating of blood dropped 42% (446 to 260). In the 20 months since this policy was introduced, 4,334 TS requests have been processed. Of these, 211 were changed to cross matching by the patient's physician, but only 100 patients (2.3%) actually received transfusions. No untoward reactions were observed by transfusing blood before the results of the cross matching were known. We estimate a savings to patients of $164,920, and conclude that TS is safe and effective.

AB - In September, 1979, the Transfusion Committee at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston implemented a preoperative blood ordering policy of type and screen (TS) for selected surgical procedures. During the first year in which this policy was in force, 2,301 TS requests were received, most of them for patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. During this time, requests for cross matching declined by 12% (28,863 to 25,283) despite a 3% increase in packed red blood cell and whole blood transfusions (11,282 to 11,629). The cross match /transfusion ratio fell from 2.55 to 2.17, and outdating of blood dropped 42% (446 to 260). In the 20 months since this policy was introduced, 4,334 TS requests have been processed. Of these, 211 were changed to cross matching by the patient's physician, but only 100 patients (2.3%) actually received transfusions. No untoward reactions were observed by transfusing blood before the results of the cross matching were known. We estimate a savings to patients of $164,920, and conclude that TS is safe and effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020042555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020042555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7058860

AN - SCOPUS:0020042555

VL - 142

SP - 563

EP - 567

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -