Universal application of colonoscopy mitigates unnecessary laparotomy in patients with pelvic tumors of unknown origin

Katie M. Love, Michael A. White, Steven Agle, Mitchel S. Hoffman, Susan Morgan, Emmanuel E. Zervos

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the utility of universal colonoscopy in patients with giant pelvic masses of unknown origin. Design: The study was designed as a retrospective case review. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent laparotomy for pelvic tumors of unknown origin with a discharge diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Records were reviewed to determine whether sufficient data had been present preoperatively or if further evaluation would have established a definitive preoperative diagnosis. Results: Over an 8-year period, 10 patients were originally thought to have gynecologic cancer and later found to have colorectal cancer. Three patients had had preoperative endoscopy: one negative, one misinterpreted by the pathologist, and one misinterpreted by the gastroenterologist. The 7 remaining patients had had mucosal abnormalities in their gross surgical specimens, suggesting that colonoscopy would have been diagnostic. Five patients had seven additional procedures to treat their colorectal cancer after the initial procedure. Conclusions: CT scan alone is insufficient to rule out colorectal cancer in patients with pelvic masses presumed to be gynecologic in origin. Universal application of colonoscopy in these patients may improve preoperative diagnostic yield in as many as 70% of patients and reduce unnecessary procedures in up to 50%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-100
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Surgery
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Laparotomy
Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Unnecessary Procedures
Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Universal application of colonoscopy mitigates unnecessary laparotomy in patients with pelvic tumors of unknown origin. / Love, Katie M.; White, Michael A.; Agle, Steven; Hoffman, Mitchel S.; Morgan, Susan; Zervos, Emmanuel E.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 94-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Love, Katie M. ; White, Michael A. ; Agle, Steven ; Hoffman, Mitchel S. ; Morgan, Susan ; Zervos, Emmanuel E. / Universal application of colonoscopy mitigates unnecessary laparotomy in patients with pelvic tumors of unknown origin. In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 94-100.
@article{e4453b7e60e04cc0b7a1298e1f325502,
title = "Universal application of colonoscopy mitigates unnecessary laparotomy in patients with pelvic tumors of unknown origin",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the utility of universal colonoscopy in patients with giant pelvic masses of unknown origin. Design: The study was designed as a retrospective case review. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent laparotomy for pelvic tumors of unknown origin with a discharge diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Records were reviewed to determine whether sufficient data had been present preoperatively or if further evaluation would have established a definitive preoperative diagnosis. Results: Over an 8-year period, 10 patients were originally thought to have gynecologic cancer and later found to have colorectal cancer. Three patients had had preoperative endoscopy: one negative, one misinterpreted by the pathologist, and one misinterpreted by the gastroenterologist. The 7 remaining patients had had mucosal abnormalities in their gross surgical specimens, suggesting that colonoscopy would have been diagnostic. Five patients had seven additional procedures to treat their colorectal cancer after the initial procedure. Conclusions: CT scan alone is insufficient to rule out colorectal cancer in patients with pelvic masses presumed to be gynecologic in origin. Universal application of colonoscopy in these patients may improve preoperative diagnostic yield in as many as 70{\%} of patients and reduce unnecessary procedures in up to 50{\%}.",
author = "Love, {Katie M.} and White, {Michael A.} and Steven Agle and Hoffman, {Mitchel S.} and Susan Morgan and Zervos, {Emmanuel E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/gyn.2011.0030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "94--100",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Surgery",
issn = "1042-4067",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universal application of colonoscopy mitigates unnecessary laparotomy in patients with pelvic tumors of unknown origin

AU - Love, Katie M.

AU - White, Michael A.

AU - Agle, Steven

AU - Hoffman, Mitchel S.

AU - Morgan, Susan

AU - Zervos, Emmanuel E.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the utility of universal colonoscopy in patients with giant pelvic masses of unknown origin. Design: The study was designed as a retrospective case review. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent laparotomy for pelvic tumors of unknown origin with a discharge diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Records were reviewed to determine whether sufficient data had been present preoperatively or if further evaluation would have established a definitive preoperative diagnosis. Results: Over an 8-year period, 10 patients were originally thought to have gynecologic cancer and later found to have colorectal cancer. Three patients had had preoperative endoscopy: one negative, one misinterpreted by the pathologist, and one misinterpreted by the gastroenterologist. The 7 remaining patients had had mucosal abnormalities in their gross surgical specimens, suggesting that colonoscopy would have been diagnostic. Five patients had seven additional procedures to treat their colorectal cancer after the initial procedure. Conclusions: CT scan alone is insufficient to rule out colorectal cancer in patients with pelvic masses presumed to be gynecologic in origin. Universal application of colonoscopy in these patients may improve preoperative diagnostic yield in as many as 70% of patients and reduce unnecessary procedures in up to 50%.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the utility of universal colonoscopy in patients with giant pelvic masses of unknown origin. Design: The study was designed as a retrospective case review. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent laparotomy for pelvic tumors of unknown origin with a discharge diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Records were reviewed to determine whether sufficient data had been present preoperatively or if further evaluation would have established a definitive preoperative diagnosis. Results: Over an 8-year period, 10 patients were originally thought to have gynecologic cancer and later found to have colorectal cancer. Three patients had had preoperative endoscopy: one negative, one misinterpreted by the pathologist, and one misinterpreted by the gastroenterologist. The 7 remaining patients had had mucosal abnormalities in their gross surgical specimens, suggesting that colonoscopy would have been diagnostic. Five patients had seven additional procedures to treat their colorectal cancer after the initial procedure. Conclusions: CT scan alone is insufficient to rule out colorectal cancer in patients with pelvic masses presumed to be gynecologic in origin. Universal application of colonoscopy in these patients may improve preoperative diagnostic yield in as many as 70% of patients and reduce unnecessary procedures in up to 50%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860306286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860306286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/gyn.2011.0030

DO - 10.1089/gyn.2011.0030

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84860306286

VL - 28

SP - 94

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

SN - 1042-4067

IS - 2

ER -