Abstract
In 1945-46, representatives of the U.S. government made similar discoveries in both Germany and Japan, unearthing evidence of unethical experiments on human beings that could be viewed as war crimes. The outcomes in the two defeated nations, however, were strikingly different. In Germany, the United States, influenced by the Canadian physician John Thompson, played a key role in bringing Nazi physicians to trial and publicizing their misdeeds. In Japan, the United States played an equally key role in concealing information about the biological warfare experiments and in securing immunity from prosecution for the perpetrators. The greater force of appeals to national security and wartime exigency help to explain these different outcomes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 220-230 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Germany
- Japan
- World War II
- biological warfare
- human research
- informed consent
- national security
- war crimes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health Policy