Usage of the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Test in psychiatry by U.S. and Canadian clerkships

Ruth E. Levine, David L. Carlson, Renate H. Rosenthal, Kathleen A. Clegg, Ross D. Crosby

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: The authors explored psychiatry clerkship usage of the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Test. Methods: U.S. and Canadian psychiatry clerkship directors (N = 150) were sent an 18-item questionnaire surveying evaluation and remediation practices. Results: Of 111 questionnaires, (74%) returned, 76 (69%) reported using the NBME Subject Test. As part of the overall grade, the test was granted a mean weight of 31% and a median weight of 25%. Of 72 clerkship directors who use the test for grading, 42% convert the percentile score and 38% convert the subject score. Of 60 clerkship directors who use the test for passing, 72% convert the raw score (mean = 58.3, median = 58), and 28% convert the percentile score (mean = 12.2th, median = 11th percentile). Conclusions: Most psychiatry clerkship directors use the NBME Subject Test, but no predominant method exists for weighing the test or converting it into a grade.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)52-57
    Number of pages6
    JournalAcademic Psychiatry
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2005

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Usage of the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Test in psychiatry by U.S. and Canadian clerkships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this