Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Use of axillary vascular grafts in prophylactic lymphovenous bypass: technical challenges and lessons learned

  • Jorge Flores Garcia
  • , J. Michael Smith
  • , Ramin Rajaii
  • , Emily L. Geisler
  • , Roman J. Skoracki
  • , Min Jeong Cho

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background – Breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common and debilitating complication of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), affecting approximately 1 in 5 patients. While preventive lymphatic surgeries such as prophylactic lymphovenous bypass (pLVB) performed at the time of ALND have been shown to decrease the risk of developing BCRL, success is frequently limited by inadequate recipient veins within the axilla. In this study, we report our experience with utilizing axillary vascular grafts harvested from within the axillary dissection field to perform pLVB in vein-depleted axillae to prevent the development of BCRL in patients undergoing ALND. Methods – A retrospective review was performed of breast cancer patients undergoing ALND with planned pLVB at a single institution. Patients in whom axillary vascular grafts were used to enable lymphatic reconstruction were included. Demographic, oncologic, operative, and graft-specific variables were collected. Outcomes included successful lymphatic reconstruction and development of BCRL, assessed using a standardized institutional surveillance protocol incorporating circumferential measurements or perometry. Results – Thirty-two patients had a mean age of 52.3 years (SD, 12.9) and median BMI of 26.9 kg/m2 (IQR, 23.8–28.7), with median follow-up of 15 months (IQR, 11–31). Of the 121 transected lymphatic vessels, interposition grafts were required for 74.8% of reconstructions. A total of 35 grafts (74.3% venous, 25.7% arterial) with median length of 5 cm (IQR, 4–6) were performed with a median of 3 pLVBs (IQR, 2–5) performed per patient. BCRL developed in 6 patients (18.8%) with an average follow-up of 21.3 months (IQR, 11−31); those affected had a higher mean number of lymph nodes removed (22.3 vs. 15.4; P < .05), and as a result, more graft-based pLVBs (median 4.5 vs. 2; P < .05). Conclusion – Axillary-based vascular grafting is a versatile strategy that expands reconstructive capacity during pLVB without additional donor-site morbidity. This approach enables completion of lymphatic reconstruction in anatomically challenging, vein-depleted axillae and represents a practical adjunct for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in high-risk breast cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1821731
JournalFrontiers in Surgery
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - May 8 2026

Keywords

  • breast cancer-related lymphedema
  • immediate lymphatic reconstruction
  • lymphatic reconstruction
  • lymphedema
  • lymphovenous bypass
  • microsurgery
  • prophylactic lymphovenous bypass
  • vascular graft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of axillary vascular grafts in prophylactic lymphovenous bypass: technical challenges and lessons learned'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this