Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice

The application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review

Ralf W. Schlosser, Oliver Wendt, Suresh Bhavnani, Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Efficient library searches for research evidence are critical to practitioners who wish to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP) as well as researchers who seek to develop systematic reviews. Aims: This review will propose the benefits of the search technique 'Pearl Growing' ('Traditional Pearl Growing') as well as an adaptation of this technique ('Comprehensive Pearl Growing'), until now ignored by the literature on EBP and systematic reviews, to aid in the retrieval of research evidence. These search techniques are illustrated with examples from the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Main Contributions: Traditional Pearl Growing is proposed as an important addition to the arsenal of EBP search strategies for practitioners. The literature on Traditional Pearl Growing is extended in that EBP presents a newly identified purpose for this technique and the benefits in identifying appropriate quality filter goes beyond its previously exclusive focus on keywords. Comprehensive Pearl Growing is projected as a new strategy for researchers searching for studies to be included in systematic reviews. Not only does it provide data-based guidance in selecting effective keywords and quality filters, but also it provides appropriate databases. Conclusions: Although the techniques Traditional Pearl Growing and Comprehensive Pearl Growing are believed to be useful for locating research evidence in any field, it may be particularly important for interdisciplinary topics where the use of effective controlled vocabulary plays a greater role in bringing together evidence that may be scattered across databases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-582
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
evidence
Research
Research Personnel
Controlled Vocabulary
Databases
Arsenals
Thesauri
Libraries
Information Seeking
Systematic Review
Pearl
Evidence-based Practice
Communication
vocabulary
communication

Keywords

  • Augmentative and alternative communication
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Literature searching
  • Systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{7868a8a6811945438b9087f382f22d01,
title = "Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: The application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review",
abstract = "Background: Efficient library searches for research evidence are critical to practitioners who wish to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP) as well as researchers who seek to develop systematic reviews. Aims: This review will propose the benefits of the search technique 'Pearl Growing' ('Traditional Pearl Growing') as well as an adaptation of this technique ('Comprehensive Pearl Growing'), until now ignored by the literature on EBP and systematic reviews, to aid in the retrieval of research evidence. These search techniques are illustrated with examples from the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Main Contributions: Traditional Pearl Growing is proposed as an important addition to the arsenal of EBP search strategies for practitioners. The literature on Traditional Pearl Growing is extended in that EBP presents a newly identified purpose for this technique and the benefits in identifying appropriate quality filter goes beyond its previously exclusive focus on keywords. Comprehensive Pearl Growing is projected as a new strategy for researchers searching for studies to be included in systematic reviews. Not only does it provide data-based guidance in selecting effective keywords and quality filters, but also it provides appropriate databases. Conclusions: Although the techniques Traditional Pearl Growing and Comprehensive Pearl Growing are believed to be useful for locating research evidence in any field, it may be particularly important for interdisciplinary topics where the use of effective controlled vocabulary plays a greater role in bringing together evidence that may be scattered across databases.",
keywords = "Augmentative and alternative communication, Evidence-based practice, Literature searching, Systematic reviews",
author = "Schlosser, {Ralf W.} and Oliver Wendt and Suresh Bhavnani and Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13682820600742190",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "567--582",
journal = "International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders",
issn = "1368-2822",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice

T2 - The application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review

AU - Schlosser, Ralf W.

AU - Wendt, Oliver

AU - Bhavnani, Suresh

AU - Nail-Chiwetalu, Barbara

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Background: Efficient library searches for research evidence are critical to practitioners who wish to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP) as well as researchers who seek to develop systematic reviews. Aims: This review will propose the benefits of the search technique 'Pearl Growing' ('Traditional Pearl Growing') as well as an adaptation of this technique ('Comprehensive Pearl Growing'), until now ignored by the literature on EBP and systematic reviews, to aid in the retrieval of research evidence. These search techniques are illustrated with examples from the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Main Contributions: Traditional Pearl Growing is proposed as an important addition to the arsenal of EBP search strategies for practitioners. The literature on Traditional Pearl Growing is extended in that EBP presents a newly identified purpose for this technique and the benefits in identifying appropriate quality filter goes beyond its previously exclusive focus on keywords. Comprehensive Pearl Growing is projected as a new strategy for researchers searching for studies to be included in systematic reviews. Not only does it provide data-based guidance in selecting effective keywords and quality filters, but also it provides appropriate databases. Conclusions: Although the techniques Traditional Pearl Growing and Comprehensive Pearl Growing are believed to be useful for locating research evidence in any field, it may be particularly important for interdisciplinary topics where the use of effective controlled vocabulary plays a greater role in bringing together evidence that may be scattered across databases.

AB - Background: Efficient library searches for research evidence are critical to practitioners who wish to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP) as well as researchers who seek to develop systematic reviews. Aims: This review will propose the benefits of the search technique 'Pearl Growing' ('Traditional Pearl Growing') as well as an adaptation of this technique ('Comprehensive Pearl Growing'), until now ignored by the literature on EBP and systematic reviews, to aid in the retrieval of research evidence. These search techniques are illustrated with examples from the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Main Contributions: Traditional Pearl Growing is proposed as an important addition to the arsenal of EBP search strategies for practitioners. The literature on Traditional Pearl Growing is extended in that EBP presents a newly identified purpose for this technique and the benefits in identifying appropriate quality filter goes beyond its previously exclusive focus on keywords. Comprehensive Pearl Growing is projected as a new strategy for researchers searching for studies to be included in systematic reviews. Not only does it provide data-based guidance in selecting effective keywords and quality filters, but also it provides appropriate databases. Conclusions: Although the techniques Traditional Pearl Growing and Comprehensive Pearl Growing are believed to be useful for locating research evidence in any field, it may be particularly important for interdisciplinary topics where the use of effective controlled vocabulary plays a greater role in bringing together evidence that may be scattered across databases.

KW - Augmentative and alternative communication

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Literature searching

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750054155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750054155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13682820600742190

DO - 10.1080/13682820600742190

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 567

EP - 582

JO - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

JF - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

SN - 1368-2822

IS - 5

ER -