Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care: Is it Possible?

Yong Fang Kuo, Mukaila A. Raji, Yu Li Lin, Margaret E. Ottenbacher, Daniel Jupiter, James S. Goodwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether Medicare data can be used to identify type and degree of collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs) [medical doctors (MDs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants] in a team care model. METHODS: We surveyed 63 primary care practices in Texas and linked the survey results to 2015 100% Medicare data. We identified PCP dyads of 2 providers in Medicare data and compared the results to those from our survey. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyads in Medicare data at different threshold numbers of shared patients were reported. We also identified PCPs who work in the same practice by Social Network Analysis (SNA) of Medicare data and compared the results to the surveys. RESULTS: With a cutoff of sharing at least 30 patients, the sensitivity of identifying dyads was 27.8%, specificity was 91.7%, and PPV 72.2%. The PPV was higher for MD-nurse practitioner/physician assistant pairs (84.4%) than for MD-MD pairs (61.5%). At the same cutoff, 90% of PCPs identified in a practice from the survey were also identified by SNA in the corresponding practice. In 5 of 8 surveyed practices with at least 3 PCPs, about ≤20% PCPs identified in the practices by SNA of Medicare data were not identified in the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data can be used to identify shared care with low sensitivity and high PPV. Community discovery from Medicare data provided good agreement in identifying members of practices. Adapting network analyses in different contexts needs more validation studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)905-912
Number of pages8
JournalMedical care
Volume57
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Medicare
Primary Health Care
Social Support
Physician Assistants
Nurse Practitioners
Validation Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care : Is it Possible? / Kuo, Yong Fang; Raji, Mukaila A.; Lin, Yu Li; Ottenbacher, Margaret E.; Jupiter, Daniel; Goodwin, James S.

In: Medical care, Vol. 57, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 905-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuo, Yong Fang ; Raji, Mukaila A. ; Lin, Yu Li ; Ottenbacher, Margaret E. ; Jupiter, Daniel ; Goodwin, James S. / Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care : Is it Possible?. In: Medical care. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 11. pp. 905-912.
@article{bb7efd6c280746e2aa5a34dac3352a89,
title = "Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care: Is it Possible?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether Medicare data can be used to identify type and degree of collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs) [medical doctors (MDs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants] in a team care model. METHODS: We surveyed 63 primary care practices in Texas and linked the survey results to 2015 100{\%} Medicare data. We identified PCP dyads of 2 providers in Medicare data and compared the results to those from our survey. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyads in Medicare data at different threshold numbers of shared patients were reported. We also identified PCPs who work in the same practice by Social Network Analysis (SNA) of Medicare data and compared the results to the surveys. RESULTS: With a cutoff of sharing at least 30 patients, the sensitivity of identifying dyads was 27.8{\%}, specificity was 91.7{\%}, and PPV 72.2{\%}. The PPV was higher for MD-nurse practitioner/physician assistant pairs (84.4{\%}) than for MD-MD pairs (61.5{\%}). At the same cutoff, 90{\%} of PCPs identified in a practice from the survey were also identified by SNA in the corresponding practice. In 5 of 8 surveyed practices with at least 3 PCPs, about ≤20{\%} PCPs identified in the practices by SNA of Medicare data were not identified in the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data can be used to identify shared care with low sensitivity and high PPV. Community discovery from Medicare data provided good agreement in identifying members of practices. Adapting network analyses in different contexts needs more validation studies.",
author = "Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Raji, {Mukaila A.} and Lin, {Yu Li} and Ottenbacher, {Margaret E.} and Daniel Jupiter and Goodwin, {James S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0000000000001201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "905--912",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care

T2 - Is it Possible?

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Raji, Mukaila A.

AU - Lin, Yu Li

AU - Ottenbacher, Margaret E.

AU - Jupiter, Daniel

AU - Goodwin, James S.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether Medicare data can be used to identify type and degree of collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs) [medical doctors (MDs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants] in a team care model. METHODS: We surveyed 63 primary care practices in Texas and linked the survey results to 2015 100% Medicare data. We identified PCP dyads of 2 providers in Medicare data and compared the results to those from our survey. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyads in Medicare data at different threshold numbers of shared patients were reported. We also identified PCPs who work in the same practice by Social Network Analysis (SNA) of Medicare data and compared the results to the surveys. RESULTS: With a cutoff of sharing at least 30 patients, the sensitivity of identifying dyads was 27.8%, specificity was 91.7%, and PPV 72.2%. The PPV was higher for MD-nurse practitioner/physician assistant pairs (84.4%) than for MD-MD pairs (61.5%). At the same cutoff, 90% of PCPs identified in a practice from the survey were also identified by SNA in the corresponding practice. In 5 of 8 surveyed practices with at least 3 PCPs, about ≤20% PCPs identified in the practices by SNA of Medicare data were not identified in the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data can be used to identify shared care with low sensitivity and high PPV. Community discovery from Medicare data provided good agreement in identifying members of practices. Adapting network analyses in different contexts needs more validation studies.

AB - BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether Medicare data can be used to identify type and degree of collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs) [medical doctors (MDs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants] in a team care model. METHODS: We surveyed 63 primary care practices in Texas and linked the survey results to 2015 100% Medicare data. We identified PCP dyads of 2 providers in Medicare data and compared the results to those from our survey. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyads in Medicare data at different threshold numbers of shared patients were reported. We also identified PCPs who work in the same practice by Social Network Analysis (SNA) of Medicare data and compared the results to the surveys. RESULTS: With a cutoff of sharing at least 30 patients, the sensitivity of identifying dyads was 27.8%, specificity was 91.7%, and PPV 72.2%. The PPV was higher for MD-nurse practitioner/physician assistant pairs (84.4%) than for MD-MD pairs (61.5%). At the same cutoff, 90% of PCPs identified in a practice from the survey were also identified by SNA in the corresponding practice. In 5 of 8 surveyed practices with at least 3 PCPs, about ≤20% PCPs identified in the practices by SNA of Medicare data were not identified in the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data can be used to identify shared care with low sensitivity and high PPV. Community discovery from Medicare data provided good agreement in identifying members of practices. Adapting network analyses in different contexts needs more validation studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073183601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073183601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001201

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001201

M3 - Article

C2 - 31568165

AN - SCOPUS:85073183601

VL - 57

SP - 905

EP - 912

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 11

ER -