Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES

Bhanu Gogia, Prashant K. Rai, Samuel A. Matthys, Eric R. Mong, Rafael Rodriguez, Ahmed Yassin, Kamakshi Patel, Chilvana Patel, Masel Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) remains challenging. In the correct clinical setting with prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, the specificity of provocative techniques to distinguish induced epileptic event from a nonepileptic event approaches 90%. We report our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) experience with the use of noninvasive verbal suggestion (VS) during hyperventilation (HV), photic stimulation (PS) as induction technique in making the diagnosis of PNES. In total, 189/423 patients were diagnosed with PNES during the EMU evaluation. Of the 189, 20 had mixed disorder and 169 patients had only PNES, 80 patients (47.3%) had a PNES with induction, and the remaining 89 of 169 patients (52.7%) had a spontaneous PNES episode that did not require induction. Verbal suggestion during HV and PS confirmed the diagnosis of PNES in 47% of the patients who otherwise did not have spontaneous events. Within the group who was diagnosed with PNES following induction, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were stopped in 53% of the patients. We believe that this is a large proportion of patients that would possibly remain undiagnosed if no induction were performed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106491
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume99
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Seizures
Photic Stimulation
Hyperventilation
Epilepsy
Suggestion
Anticonvulsants
Electroencephalography

Keywords

  • Noninvasive induction
  • Placebo induction
  • Psychogenic nonepileptiform seizures
  • Verbal suggestion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Gogia, B., Rai, P. K., Matthys, S. A., Mong, E. R., Rodriguez, R., Yassin, A., ... Todd, M. (2019). Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES. Epilepsy and Behavior, 99, [106491]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106491

Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES. / Gogia, Bhanu; Rai, Prashant K.; Matthys, Samuel A.; Mong, Eric R.; Rodriguez, Rafael; Yassin, Ahmed; Patel, Kamakshi; Patel, Chilvana; Todd, Masel.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 99, 106491, 10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gogia, B, Rai, PK, Matthys, SA, Mong, ER, Rodriguez, R, Yassin, A, Patel, K, Patel, C & Todd, M 2019, 'Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES', Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 99, 106491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106491
Gogia, Bhanu ; Rai, Prashant K. ; Matthys, Samuel A. ; Mong, Eric R. ; Rodriguez, Rafael ; Yassin, Ahmed ; Patel, Kamakshi ; Patel, Chilvana ; Todd, Masel. / Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 99.
@article{98e1784d5dad459c95d6682e2ff973b8,
title = "Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES",
abstract = "The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) remains challenging. In the correct clinical setting with prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, the specificity of provocative techniques to distinguish induced epileptic event from a nonepileptic event approaches 90{\%}. We report our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) experience with the use of noninvasive verbal suggestion (VS) during hyperventilation (HV), photic stimulation (PS) as induction technique in making the diagnosis of PNES. In total, 189/423 patients were diagnosed with PNES during the EMU evaluation. Of the 189, 20 had mixed disorder and 169 patients had only PNES, 80 patients (47.3{\%}) had a PNES with induction, and the remaining 89 of 169 patients (52.7{\%}) had a spontaneous PNES episode that did not require induction. Verbal suggestion during HV and PS confirmed the diagnosis of PNES in 47{\%} of the patients who otherwise did not have spontaneous events. Within the group who was diagnosed with PNES following induction, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were stopped in 53{\%} of the patients. We believe that this is a large proportion of patients that would possibly remain undiagnosed if no induction were performed.",
keywords = "Noninvasive induction, Placebo induction, Psychogenic nonepileptiform seizures, Verbal suggestion",
author = "Bhanu Gogia and Rai, {Prashant K.} and Matthys, {Samuel A.} and Mong, {Eric R.} and Rafael Rodriguez and Ahmed Yassin and Kamakshi Patel and Chilvana Patel and Masel Todd",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106491",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of noninvasive induction techniques in the diagnosis of PNES

AU - Gogia, Bhanu

AU - Rai, Prashant K.

AU - Matthys, Samuel A.

AU - Mong, Eric R.

AU - Rodriguez, Rafael

AU - Yassin, Ahmed

AU - Patel, Kamakshi

AU - Patel, Chilvana

AU - Todd, Masel

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) remains challenging. In the correct clinical setting with prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, the specificity of provocative techniques to distinguish induced epileptic event from a nonepileptic event approaches 90%. We report our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) experience with the use of noninvasive verbal suggestion (VS) during hyperventilation (HV), photic stimulation (PS) as induction technique in making the diagnosis of PNES. In total, 189/423 patients were diagnosed with PNES during the EMU evaluation. Of the 189, 20 had mixed disorder and 169 patients had only PNES, 80 patients (47.3%) had a PNES with induction, and the remaining 89 of 169 patients (52.7%) had a spontaneous PNES episode that did not require induction. Verbal suggestion during HV and PS confirmed the diagnosis of PNES in 47% of the patients who otherwise did not have spontaneous events. Within the group who was diagnosed with PNES following induction, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were stopped in 53% of the patients. We believe that this is a large proportion of patients that would possibly remain undiagnosed if no induction were performed.

AB - The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) remains challenging. In the correct clinical setting with prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, the specificity of provocative techniques to distinguish induced epileptic event from a nonepileptic event approaches 90%. We report our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) experience with the use of noninvasive verbal suggestion (VS) during hyperventilation (HV), photic stimulation (PS) as induction technique in making the diagnosis of PNES. In total, 189/423 patients were diagnosed with PNES during the EMU evaluation. Of the 189, 20 had mixed disorder and 169 patients had only PNES, 80 patients (47.3%) had a PNES with induction, and the remaining 89 of 169 patients (52.7%) had a spontaneous PNES episode that did not require induction. Verbal suggestion during HV and PS confirmed the diagnosis of PNES in 47% of the patients who otherwise did not have spontaneous events. Within the group who was diagnosed with PNES following induction, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were stopped in 53% of the patients. We believe that this is a large proportion of patients that would possibly remain undiagnosed if no induction were performed.

KW - Noninvasive induction

KW - Placebo induction

KW - Psychogenic nonepileptiform seizures

KW - Verbal suggestion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073614198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073614198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106491

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106491

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073614198

VL - 99

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

M1 - 106491

ER -