TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of pegvaliase in the management of phenylketonuria
T2 - Case series of early experience in US clinics
AU - Adams, Darius
AU - Andersson, Hans C.
AU - Bausell, Heather
AU - Crivelly, Kea
AU - Eggerding, Caroline
AU - Lah, Melissa
AU - Lilienstein, Joshua
AU - Lindstrom, Kristin
AU - McNutt, Markey
AU - Ray, Joseph W.
AU - Saavedra, Heather
AU - Sacharow, Stephanie
AU - Starin, Danielle
AU - Tiffany-Amaro, Jennifer
AU - Thomas, Janet
AU - Vucko, Erika
AU - Wessenberg, Leah B.
AU - Whitehall, Kaleigh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Objective: To present a case series that illustrates real-world use of pegvaliase based on the initial experiences of US healthcare providers. Methods: Sixteen healthcare providers from 14 centers across the US with substantial clinical experience in treating patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) with pegvaliase in the two-plus years since FDA approval (May 2018) provided cases that exemplified important lessons from their initial experiences treating patients with pegvaliase. Key lessons from each case and takeaway points were discussed in both live and virtual meetings. Results: Fifteen cases of adults with PKU (eight males, seven females), representing a spectrum of age (18 to 53 years), previous PKU care, comorbidities, and socioeconomic situations were reviewed and discussed. Full extended case reports are included in the Supplement. The cases showed that treating patients with a daily injectable can be challenging due to a patient's financial problems, treatment challenges, and neuropsychological and psychiatric comorbidities, which can be identified before starting pegvaliase, but do not prohibit successful treatment. The authors agreed that patient education on adverse events (AEs), time to efficacy, dietary changes, and food preparation is an ongoing process that should start prior to initiating pegvaliase treatment. Treatment goals and planned dietary changes once efficacy is reached should be defined prior to treatment initiation and re-evaluated throughout the course of therapy. Each patient's titration schedule and dietary adjustments are unique, depending on occurrence of AEs and individual goals of treatment. Despite the AE profile of pegvaliase, all but two patients remained motivated to continue treatment and achieved efficacy (except one patient in whom titration was still ongoing). AEs occurring early in the treatment pathway may require prolongation of the titration phase and/or concomitant medication use, but do not seem indicative of future tolerability or eventual efficacy. Close follow-up of patients during titration and maintenance to help with dietary changes is important. Conclusion: This case series provides real-world experience on the use of pegvaliase. Until data from registries and independent research become available, the data presented herein can support appropriate management of patients receiving pegvaliase in clinical practice.
AB - Objective: To present a case series that illustrates real-world use of pegvaliase based on the initial experiences of US healthcare providers. Methods: Sixteen healthcare providers from 14 centers across the US with substantial clinical experience in treating patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) with pegvaliase in the two-plus years since FDA approval (May 2018) provided cases that exemplified important lessons from their initial experiences treating patients with pegvaliase. Key lessons from each case and takeaway points were discussed in both live and virtual meetings. Results: Fifteen cases of adults with PKU (eight males, seven females), representing a spectrum of age (18 to 53 years), previous PKU care, comorbidities, and socioeconomic situations were reviewed and discussed. Full extended case reports are included in the Supplement. The cases showed that treating patients with a daily injectable can be challenging due to a patient's financial problems, treatment challenges, and neuropsychological and psychiatric comorbidities, which can be identified before starting pegvaliase, but do not prohibit successful treatment. The authors agreed that patient education on adverse events (AEs), time to efficacy, dietary changes, and food preparation is an ongoing process that should start prior to initiating pegvaliase treatment. Treatment goals and planned dietary changes once efficacy is reached should be defined prior to treatment initiation and re-evaluated throughout the course of therapy. Each patient's titration schedule and dietary adjustments are unique, depending on occurrence of AEs and individual goals of treatment. Despite the AE profile of pegvaliase, all but two patients remained motivated to continue treatment and achieved efficacy (except one patient in whom titration was still ongoing). AEs occurring early in the treatment pathway may require prolongation of the titration phase and/or concomitant medication use, but do not seem indicative of future tolerability or eventual efficacy. Close follow-up of patients during titration and maintenance to help with dietary changes is important. Conclusion: This case series provides real-world experience on the use of pegvaliase. Until data from registries and independent research become available, the data presented herein can support appropriate management of patients receiving pegvaliase in clinical practice.
KW - Adverse events
KW - Case series
KW - PEGylated phenylalanine ammonia lyase
KW - PKU diet
KW - Pegvaliase
KW - Phenylketonuria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112457624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112457624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2021.100790
DO - 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2021.100790
M3 - Article
C2 - 34430209
AN - SCOPUS:85112457624
SN - 2214-4269
VL - 28
JO - Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports
JF - Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports
M1 - 100790
ER -