Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision

Tri A. Dinh, Vicki J. Schnadig, Roberto Logrono, Edward V. Hannigan, Joseph T. Santoso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study assesses cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal immediately after loop excision. Material and methods. In 103 patients, we performed a cytologic smear and endocervical curettage immediately after loop excision. Diagnoses were made independently by two cytopathologists and compared to histology. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated statistically. Results. Cytopathologist "A" found a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.9, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.44 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.0. Cytopathologist "B" found a sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.78, PPV of 0.3 and NPV of 0.98. There was good agreement between the two cytopathologists (kappa = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.60). Twenty-five endocervical curettage specimens were insufficient for diagnosis. Seven and 4 cytology specimens were judged unsatisfactory by each cytopathologist, respectively. Histologic and cytologic evaluation charges were $283 and $60.50 per patient, respectively. Conclusion. The use of cytology efficiently evaluates the endocervical canal after loop excision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-31
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cell Biology
Curettage
Sensitivity and Specificity
Histology

Keywords

  • CIN
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Cytology
  • Endocervical curettage
  • Leep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision. / Dinh, Tri A.; Schnadig, Vicki J.; Logrono, Roberto; Hannigan, Edward V.; Santoso, Joseph T.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2002, p. 27-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dinh, Tri A. ; Schnadig, Vicki J. ; Logrono, Roberto ; Hannigan, Edward V. ; Santoso, Joseph T. / Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision. In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2002 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 27-31.
@article{7d02a99d853c44e8abc81a0a7f4edd40,
title = "Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision",
abstract = "Objective. This study assesses cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal immediately after loop excision. Material and methods. In 103 patients, we performed a cytologic smear and endocervical curettage immediately after loop excision. Diagnoses were made independently by two cytopathologists and compared to histology. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated statistically. Results. Cytopathologist {"}A{"} found a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.9, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.44 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.0. Cytopathologist {"}B{"} found a sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.78, PPV of 0.3 and NPV of 0.98. There was good agreement between the two cytopathologists (kappa = 0.42, 95{\%} CI = 0.25, 0.60). Twenty-five endocervical curettage specimens were insufficient for diagnosis. Seven and 4 cytology specimens were judged unsatisfactory by each cytopathologist, respectively. Histologic and cytologic evaluation charges were $283 and $60.50 per patient, respectively. Conclusion. The use of cytology efficiently evaluates the endocervical canal after loop excision.",
keywords = "CIN, Cost effectiveness, Cytology, Endocervical curettage, Leep",
author = "Dinh, {Tri A.} and Schnadig, {Vicki J.} and Roberto Logrono and Hannigan, {Edward V.} and Santoso, {Joseph T.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1046/j.1526-0976.2002.61006.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "27--31",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal after loop excision

AU - Dinh, Tri A.

AU - Schnadig, Vicki J.

AU - Logrono, Roberto

AU - Hannigan, Edward V.

AU - Santoso, Joseph T.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective. This study assesses cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal immediately after loop excision. Material and methods. In 103 patients, we performed a cytologic smear and endocervical curettage immediately after loop excision. Diagnoses were made independently by two cytopathologists and compared to histology. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated statistically. Results. Cytopathologist "A" found a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.9, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.44 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.0. Cytopathologist "B" found a sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.78, PPV of 0.3 and NPV of 0.98. There was good agreement between the two cytopathologists (kappa = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.60). Twenty-five endocervical curettage specimens were insufficient for diagnosis. Seven and 4 cytology specimens were judged unsatisfactory by each cytopathologist, respectively. Histologic and cytologic evaluation charges were $283 and $60.50 per patient, respectively. Conclusion. The use of cytology efficiently evaluates the endocervical canal after loop excision.

AB - Objective. This study assesses cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal immediately after loop excision. Material and methods. In 103 patients, we performed a cytologic smear and endocervical curettage immediately after loop excision. Diagnoses were made independently by two cytopathologists and compared to histology. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated statistically. Results. Cytopathologist "A" found a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.9, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.44 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.0. Cytopathologist "B" found a sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.78, PPV of 0.3 and NPV of 0.98. There was good agreement between the two cytopathologists (kappa = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.60). Twenty-five endocervical curettage specimens were insufficient for diagnosis. Seven and 4 cytology specimens were judged unsatisfactory by each cytopathologist, respectively. Histologic and cytologic evaluation charges were $283 and $60.50 per patient, respectively. Conclusion. The use of cytology efficiently evaluates the endocervical canal after loop excision.

KW - CIN

KW - Cost effectiveness

KW - Cytology

KW - Endocervical curettage

KW - Leep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036286224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036286224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1526-0976.2002.61006.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1526-0976.2002.61006.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17050989

AN - SCOPUS:0036286224

VL - 6

SP - 27

EP - 31

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 1

ER -