Utility of Functional Status for Classifying Community Versus Institutional Discharges After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Stroke

Timothy Reistetter, James E. Graham, Anne Deutsch, Carl V. Granger, Samuel Markello, Kenneth Ottenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Objective: To evaluate the ability of patient functional status to differentiate between community and institutional discharges after rehabilitation for stroke. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: Patients (N=157,066) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for stroke from 2006 and 2007. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Discharge FIM rating and discharge setting (community vs institutional). Results: Approximately 71% of the sample was discharged to the community. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that FIM total performed as well as or better than FIM motor and FIM cognition subscales in differentiating discharge settings. Area under the curve for FIM total was .85, indicating very good ability to identify persons discharged to the community. A FIM total rating of 78 was identified as the optimal cut point for distinguishing between positive (community) and negative (institution) tests. This cut point yielded balanced sensitivity and specificity (both=.77). Conclusions: Discharge planning is complex, involving many factors. Identifying a functional threshold for classifying discharge settings can provide important information to assist in this process. Additional research is needed to determine if the risks and benefits of classification errors justify shifting the cut point to weight either sensitivity or specificity of FIM ratings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-350
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Aptitude
Rehabilitation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Patient Discharge
Information Systems
ROC Curve
Cognition
Area Under Curve
Stroke Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Weights and Measures
Research

Keywords

  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Utility of Functional Status for Classifying Community Versus Institutional Discharges After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Stroke. / Reistetter, Timothy; Graham, James E.; Deutsch, Anne; Granger, Carl V.; Markello, Samuel; Ottenbacher, Kenneth.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 91, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 345-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reistetter, Timothy ; Graham, James E. ; Deutsch, Anne ; Granger, Carl V. ; Markello, Samuel ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth. / Utility of Functional Status for Classifying Community Versus Institutional Discharges After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Stroke. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010 ; Vol. 91, No. 3. pp. 345-350.
@article{37cbd7af4c1d47c399ce9525a3b7a43b,
title = "Utility of Functional Status for Classifying Community Versus Institutional Discharges After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Stroke",
abstract = "Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Objective: To evaluate the ability of patient functional status to differentiate between community and institutional discharges after rehabilitation for stroke. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: Patients (N=157,066) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for stroke from 2006 and 2007. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Discharge FIM rating and discharge setting (community vs institutional). Results: Approximately 71{\%} of the sample was discharged to the community. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that FIM total performed as well as or better than FIM motor and FIM cognition subscales in differentiating discharge settings. Area under the curve for FIM total was .85, indicating very good ability to identify persons discharged to the community. A FIM total rating of 78 was identified as the optimal cut point for distinguishing between positive (community) and negative (institution) tests. This cut point yielded balanced sensitivity and specificity (both=.77). Conclusions: Discharge planning is complex, involving many factors. Identifying a functional threshold for classifying discharge settings can provide important information to assist in this process. Additional research is needed to determine if the risks and benefits of classification errors justify shifting the cut point to weight either sensitivity or specificity of FIM ratings.",
keywords = "Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation",
author = "Timothy Reistetter and Graham, {James E.} and Anne Deutsch and Granger, {Carl V.} and Samuel Markello and Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "345--350",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of Functional Status for Classifying Community Versus Institutional Discharges After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Stroke

AU - Reistetter, Timothy

AU - Graham, James E.

AU - Deutsch, Anne

AU - Granger, Carl V.

AU - Markello, Samuel

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Objective: To evaluate the ability of patient functional status to differentiate between community and institutional discharges after rehabilitation for stroke. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: Patients (N=157,066) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for stroke from 2006 and 2007. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Discharge FIM rating and discharge setting (community vs institutional). Results: Approximately 71% of the sample was discharged to the community. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that FIM total performed as well as or better than FIM motor and FIM cognition subscales in differentiating discharge settings. Area under the curve for FIM total was .85, indicating very good ability to identify persons discharged to the community. A FIM total rating of 78 was identified as the optimal cut point for distinguishing between positive (community) and negative (institution) tests. This cut point yielded balanced sensitivity and specificity (both=.77). Conclusions: Discharge planning is complex, involving many factors. Identifying a functional threshold for classifying discharge settings can provide important information to assist in this process. Additional research is needed to determine if the risks and benefits of classification errors justify shifting the cut point to weight either sensitivity or specificity of FIM ratings.

AB - Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Objective: To evaluate the ability of patient functional status to differentiate between community and institutional discharges after rehabilitation for stroke. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Participants: Patients (N=157,066) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for stroke from 2006 and 2007. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Discharge FIM rating and discharge setting (community vs institutional). Results: Approximately 71% of the sample was discharged to the community. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that FIM total performed as well as or better than FIM motor and FIM cognition subscales in differentiating discharge settings. Area under the curve for FIM total was .85, indicating very good ability to identify persons discharged to the community. A FIM total rating of 78 was identified as the optimal cut point for distinguishing between positive (community) and negative (institution) tests. This cut point yielded balanced sensitivity and specificity (both=.77). Conclusions: Discharge planning is complex, involving many factors. Identifying a functional threshold for classifying discharge settings can provide important information to assist in this process. Additional research is needed to determine if the risks and benefits of classification errors justify shifting the cut point to weight either sensitivity or specificity of FIM ratings.

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949309102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949309102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.010

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 345

EP - 350

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 3

ER -