Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding

Atul Ratra, Supannee Rassameehiran, Sreeram Parupudi, Kenneth Nugent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding frequently require hospitalization and have a mortality rate that ranges from 6% to 14%. These patients need rapid clinical assessment to determine the urgency of endoscopy and the need for endoscopic treatment. Risk-scoring tools, such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow-Blatchford score, are commonly used in this assessment. These tools clearly help identify high-risk patients but do not necessarily have good predictive value in identifying important outcomes. Their diagnostic accuracy in identifying rebleeding and mortality ranges from poor to fair. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) provides an integrated assessment of the cardiovascular status. It can be easily calculated during the initial evaluation of patients and monitoring after treatment. The shock index has been used in a few studies in patients with acute GI bleeding, including studies to determine which patients need emergency endoscopy, to predict complications after corrosive ingestions, to identify delayed hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate the utility of angiograms to identify sites of GI bleeding. Not all studies have found the shock index to be useful in patients with GI bleeding, however. This may reflect the unpredictable natural history of various etiologies of GI bleeding, comorbidity that may influence blood pressure and/or heart rate, and inadequate data acquisition. The shock index needs more formal study in patients with GI bleeding admitted to medical intensive care units. Important considerations include the initial response to resuscitation, persistent bleeding following initial treatment, and rebleeding following a period of stabilization. In addition, it needs correlation with other risk-scoring tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-184
Number of pages7
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume109
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Shock
Hemorrhage
Blood Pressure
Endoscopy
Heart Rate
Caustics
Mortality
Physiologic Monitoring
Natural History
Resuscitation
Intensive Care Units
Comorbidity
Angiography
Hospitalization
Emergencies
Therapeutics
Eating

Keywords

  • gastrointestinal bleeding
  • outcomes
  • risk scoring
  • shock index
  • transfusions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. / Ratra, Atul; Rassameehiran, Supannee; Parupudi, Sreeram; Nugent, Kenneth.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 109, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 178-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ratra, Atul ; Rassameehiran, Supannee ; Parupudi, Sreeram ; Nugent, Kenneth. / Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 109, No. 3. pp. 178-184.
@article{768aba0d85a64b21b95e7d9bb4279cf2,
title = "Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding",
abstract = "Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding frequently require hospitalization and have a mortality rate that ranges from 6{\%} to 14{\%}. These patients need rapid clinical assessment to determine the urgency of endoscopy and the need for endoscopic treatment. Risk-scoring tools, such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow-Blatchford score, are commonly used in this assessment. These tools clearly help identify high-risk patients but do not necessarily have good predictive value in identifying important outcomes. Their diagnostic accuracy in identifying rebleeding and mortality ranges from poor to fair. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) provides an integrated assessment of the cardiovascular status. It can be easily calculated during the initial evaluation of patients and monitoring after treatment. The shock index has been used in a few studies in patients with acute GI bleeding, including studies to determine which patients need emergency endoscopy, to predict complications after corrosive ingestions, to identify delayed hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate the utility of angiograms to identify sites of GI bleeding. Not all studies have found the shock index to be useful in patients with GI bleeding, however. This may reflect the unpredictable natural history of various etiologies of GI bleeding, comorbidity that may influence blood pressure and/or heart rate, and inadequate data acquisition. The shock index needs more formal study in patients with GI bleeding admitted to medical intensive care units. Important considerations include the initial response to resuscitation, persistent bleeding following initial treatment, and rebleeding following a period of stabilization. In addition, it needs correlation with other risk-scoring tools.",
keywords = "gastrointestinal bleeding, outcomes, risk scoring, shock index, transfusions",
author = "Atul Ratra and Supannee Rassameehiran and Sreeram Parupudi and Kenneth Nugent",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "178--184",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding

AU - Ratra, Atul

AU - Rassameehiran, Supannee

AU - Parupudi, Sreeram

AU - Nugent, Kenneth

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding frequently require hospitalization and have a mortality rate that ranges from 6% to 14%. These patients need rapid clinical assessment to determine the urgency of endoscopy and the need for endoscopic treatment. Risk-scoring tools, such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow-Blatchford score, are commonly used in this assessment. These tools clearly help identify high-risk patients but do not necessarily have good predictive value in identifying important outcomes. Their diagnostic accuracy in identifying rebleeding and mortality ranges from poor to fair. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) provides an integrated assessment of the cardiovascular status. It can be easily calculated during the initial evaluation of patients and monitoring after treatment. The shock index has been used in a few studies in patients with acute GI bleeding, including studies to determine which patients need emergency endoscopy, to predict complications after corrosive ingestions, to identify delayed hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate the utility of angiograms to identify sites of GI bleeding. Not all studies have found the shock index to be useful in patients with GI bleeding, however. This may reflect the unpredictable natural history of various etiologies of GI bleeding, comorbidity that may influence blood pressure and/or heart rate, and inadequate data acquisition. The shock index needs more formal study in patients with GI bleeding admitted to medical intensive care units. Important considerations include the initial response to resuscitation, persistent bleeding following initial treatment, and rebleeding following a period of stabilization. In addition, it needs correlation with other risk-scoring tools.

AB - Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding frequently require hospitalization and have a mortality rate that ranges from 6% to 14%. These patients need rapid clinical assessment to determine the urgency of endoscopy and the need for endoscopic treatment. Risk-scoring tools, such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow-Blatchford score, are commonly used in this assessment. These tools clearly help identify high-risk patients but do not necessarily have good predictive value in identifying important outcomes. Their diagnostic accuracy in identifying rebleeding and mortality ranges from poor to fair. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) provides an integrated assessment of the cardiovascular status. It can be easily calculated during the initial evaluation of patients and monitoring after treatment. The shock index has been used in a few studies in patients with acute GI bleeding, including studies to determine which patients need emergency endoscopy, to predict complications after corrosive ingestions, to identify delayed hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate the utility of angiograms to identify sites of GI bleeding. Not all studies have found the shock index to be useful in patients with GI bleeding, however. This may reflect the unpredictable natural history of various etiologies of GI bleeding, comorbidity that may influence blood pressure and/or heart rate, and inadequate data acquisition. The shock index needs more formal study in patients with GI bleeding admitted to medical intensive care units. Important considerations include the initial response to resuscitation, persistent bleeding following initial treatment, and rebleeding following a period of stabilization. In addition, it needs correlation with other risk-scoring tools.

KW - gastrointestinal bleeding

KW - outcomes

KW - risk scoring

KW - shock index

KW - transfusions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959892567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959892567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000427

DO - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000427

M3 - Article

C2 - 26954657

AN - SCOPUS:84959892567

VL - 109

SP - 178

EP - 184

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 3

ER -