Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease

Osamu Takahashi, Takuro Shimbo, Mahbubur Rahman, Rahman Musa, Wataru Kurokawa, Takeshi Yoshinaka, Tsuguya Fukui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been shown to be useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle systolic blood pressures are measured by a Doppler device; however, general physicians cannot always use it in daily practice. The ausculutatory method (AUS) is an alternative method and quite easy to perform, but has not yet been validated in diagnosing PAD. Objective. To validate AUS for diagnosing PAD based on ABI, compared with Doppler method as gold standard. Methods. Cross-sectional study. Study subjects were 119 patients aged 50 years and older, who were consecutively admitted to the division of general internal medicine in two community hospitals in Japan. We measured the systolic blood pressures of the brachial and the posterior tibial arteries by two methods. We calculated the ABI from the systolic blood pressure obtained by these two methods. PAD was considered to be present when ABI ≤0.90 by the Doppler method. Results. PAD was diagnosed in 22 (18.5%) of 119 patients. Korotkoff sounds of legs were inaudible by AUS in 47 (39.5%) patients. The likelihood ratios for diagnosing PAD patients by AUS were 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9) in cases with inaudible Korotkoff sounds, 0.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.9) when ABI ≤0.9 and 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.4) when ABI >0.9. Conclusions. While AUS is not efficient enough to confirm the presence of PAD based on ABI, it could be clinically useful in excluding PAD when ABI >0.90. When measuring ankle blood pressure by AUS in the daily practice, it is important to realise its strengths and weaknesses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-14
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Practice
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peripheral Arterial Disease
Ankle Brachial Index
Blood Pressure
Ankle
Tibial Arteries
Community Hospital
Internal Medicine
Leg
Japan
Arm
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Ankle-brachial index
  • Auscultation
  • Doppler
  • Peripheral arterial disease
  • Sensitivity and specificity
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Takahashi, O., Shimbo, T., Rahman, M., Musa, R., Kurokawa, W., Yoshinaka, T., & Fukui, T. (2006). Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Family Practice, 23(6), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi034

Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. / Takahashi, Osamu; Shimbo, Takuro; Rahman, Mahbubur; Musa, Rahman; Kurokawa, Wataru; Yoshinaka, Takeshi; Fukui, Tsuguya.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 10-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahashi, O, Shimbo, T, Rahman, M, Musa, R, Kurokawa, W, Yoshinaka, T & Fukui, T 2006, 'Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease', Family Practice, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi034
Takahashi O, Shimbo T, Rahman M, Musa R, Kurokawa W, Yoshinaka T et al. Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Family Practice. 2006 Dec 1;23(6):10-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi034
Takahashi, Osamu ; Shimbo, Takuro ; Rahman, Mahbubur ; Musa, Rahman ; Kurokawa, Wataru ; Yoshinaka, Takeshi ; Fukui, Tsuguya. / Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. In: Family Practice. 2006 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 10-14.
@article{4ffa69f3b82e44e0be9753683bdbbe35,
title = "Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease",
abstract = "Background. The Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been shown to be useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle systolic blood pressures are measured by a Doppler device; however, general physicians cannot always use it in daily practice. The ausculutatory method (AUS) is an alternative method and quite easy to perform, but has not yet been validated in diagnosing PAD. Objective. To validate AUS for diagnosing PAD based on ABI, compared with Doppler method as gold standard. Methods. Cross-sectional study. Study subjects were 119 patients aged 50 years and older, who were consecutively admitted to the division of general internal medicine in two community hospitals in Japan. We measured the systolic blood pressures of the brachial and the posterior tibial arteries by two methods. We calculated the ABI from the systolic blood pressure obtained by these two methods. PAD was considered to be present when ABI ≤0.90 by the Doppler method. Results. PAD was diagnosed in 22 (18.5{\%}) of 119 patients. Korotkoff sounds of legs were inaudible by AUS in 47 (39.5{\%}) patients. The likelihood ratios for diagnosing PAD patients by AUS were 2.7 (95{\%} CI 1.9 to 3.9) in cases with inaudible Korotkoff sounds, 0.7 (95{\%} CI 0.2 to 1.9) when ABI ≤0.9 and 0.09 (95{\%} CI 0.02 to 0.4) when ABI >0.9. Conclusions. While AUS is not efficient enough to confirm the presence of PAD based on ABI, it could be clinically useful in excluding PAD when ABI >0.90. When measuring ankle blood pressure by AUS in the daily practice, it is important to realise its strengths and weaknesses.",
keywords = "Ankle-brachial index, Auscultation, Doppler, Peripheral arterial disease, Sensitivity and specificity, Ultrasonography",
author = "Osamu Takahashi and Takuro Shimbo and Mahbubur Rahman and Rahman Musa and Wataru Kurokawa and Takeshi Yoshinaka and Tsuguya Fukui",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmi034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "10--14",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease

AU - Takahashi, Osamu

AU - Shimbo, Takuro

AU - Rahman, Mahbubur

AU - Musa, Rahman

AU - Kurokawa, Wataru

AU - Yoshinaka, Takeshi

AU - Fukui, Tsuguya

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Background. The Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been shown to be useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle systolic blood pressures are measured by a Doppler device; however, general physicians cannot always use it in daily practice. The ausculutatory method (AUS) is an alternative method and quite easy to perform, but has not yet been validated in diagnosing PAD. Objective. To validate AUS for diagnosing PAD based on ABI, compared with Doppler method as gold standard. Methods. Cross-sectional study. Study subjects were 119 patients aged 50 years and older, who were consecutively admitted to the division of general internal medicine in two community hospitals in Japan. We measured the systolic blood pressures of the brachial and the posterior tibial arteries by two methods. We calculated the ABI from the systolic blood pressure obtained by these two methods. PAD was considered to be present when ABI ≤0.90 by the Doppler method. Results. PAD was diagnosed in 22 (18.5%) of 119 patients. Korotkoff sounds of legs were inaudible by AUS in 47 (39.5%) patients. The likelihood ratios for diagnosing PAD patients by AUS were 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9) in cases with inaudible Korotkoff sounds, 0.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.9) when ABI ≤0.9 and 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.4) when ABI >0.9. Conclusions. While AUS is not efficient enough to confirm the presence of PAD based on ABI, it could be clinically useful in excluding PAD when ABI >0.90. When measuring ankle blood pressure by AUS in the daily practice, it is important to realise its strengths and weaknesses.

AB - Background. The Ankle brachial index (ABI) has been shown to be useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle systolic blood pressures are measured by a Doppler device; however, general physicians cannot always use it in daily practice. The ausculutatory method (AUS) is an alternative method and quite easy to perform, but has not yet been validated in diagnosing PAD. Objective. To validate AUS for diagnosing PAD based on ABI, compared with Doppler method as gold standard. Methods. Cross-sectional study. Study subjects were 119 patients aged 50 years and older, who were consecutively admitted to the division of general internal medicine in two community hospitals in Japan. We measured the systolic blood pressures of the brachial and the posterior tibial arteries by two methods. We calculated the ABI from the systolic blood pressure obtained by these two methods. PAD was considered to be present when ABI ≤0.90 by the Doppler method. Results. PAD was diagnosed in 22 (18.5%) of 119 patients. Korotkoff sounds of legs were inaudible by AUS in 47 (39.5%) patients. The likelihood ratios for diagnosing PAD patients by AUS were 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9) in cases with inaudible Korotkoff sounds, 0.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.9) when ABI ≤0.9 and 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.4) when ABI >0.9. Conclusions. While AUS is not efficient enough to confirm the presence of PAD based on ABI, it could be clinically useful in excluding PAD when ABI >0.90. When measuring ankle blood pressure by AUS in the daily practice, it is important to realise its strengths and weaknesses.

KW - Ankle-brachial index

KW - Auscultation

KW - Doppler

KW - Peripheral arterial disease

KW - Sensitivity and specificity

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849185895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849185895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmi034

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmi034

M3 - Article

C2 - 16207745

AN - SCOPUS:37849185895

VL - 23

SP - 10

EP - 14

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 6

ER -