Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Variation in care for patients presenting with hip fracture in six high-income countries: A cross-sectional cohort study

  • Nitzan Burrack
  • , Laura A. Hatfield
  • , Pieter Bakx
  • , Amitava Banerjee
  • , Yu Chin Chen
  • , Christina Fu
  • , Carlos Godoy Junior
  • , Michal Gordon
  • , Renaud Heine
  • , Nicole Huang
  • , Dennis T. Ko
  • , Lisa M. Lix
  • , Victor Novack
  • , Laura Pasea
  • , Feng Qiu
  • , Therese A. Stukel
  • , Carin Uyl-de Groot
  • , Bheeshma Ravi
  • , Saeed Al-Azazi
  • , Gabe Weinreb
  • Peter Cram, Bruce E. Landon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Hip fractures are costly and common in older adults, but there is limited understanding of how treatment patterns and outcomes might differ between countries. Methods: We performed a retrospective serial cross-sectional cohort study of adults aged ≥66 years hospitalized with hip fracture between 2011 and 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population-representative administrative data. We examined mortality, hip fracture treatment approaches (total hip arthroplasty [THA], hemiarthroplasty [HA], internal fixation [IF], and nonoperative), and health system performance measures, including hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and time-to-surgery. Results: The total number of hip fracture admissions between 2011 and 2018 ranged from 23,941 in Israel to 1,219,696 in the US. In 2018, 30-day mortality varied from 3% (16% at 1 year) in Taiwan to 10% (27%) in the Netherlands. With regards to processes of care, the proportion of hip fractures treated with HA (range 23%–45%) and THA (0.2%–10%) differed widely across countries. For example, in 2018, THA was used to treat approximately 9% of patients in England and Israel but less than 1% in Taiwan. Overall, IF was the most common surgery performed in all countries (40%–60% of patients). IF was used in approximately 60% of patients in the US and Israel, but only 40% in England. In 2018, rates of nonoperative management ranged from 5% of patients in Taiwan to nearly 10% in England. Mean hospital LOS in 2018 ranged from 6.4 days (US) to 18.7 days (England). The 30-day readmission rate in 2018 ranged from 8% (in Canada and the Netherlands) to nearly 18% in England. The mean days to surgery in 2018 ranged from 0.5 days (Israel) to 1.6 days (Canada). Conclusions: We observed substantial between-country variation in mortality, surgical approaches, and health system performance measures. These findings underscore the need for further research to inform evidence-based surgical approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3780-3791
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume71
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • healthcare policy
  • hip fracture
  • international comparison
  • longevity
  • osteoporosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation in care for patients presenting with hip fracture in six high-income countries: A cross-sectional cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this