TY - JOUR
T1 - Vehicle Restraint Considerations for Commercial Spaceflight
AU - Speicher, Leigh L.
AU - Blue, Rebecca S.
AU - Vanderploeg, James M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work presented here was performed, in part, under a Federal Aviation Administration Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation grant dedicated to the investigation of future concerns for commercial spaceflight. The authors acknowledge additional support from the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI) through NASA NCC 9-58. Although the FAA and NSBRI have sponsored this project, neither endorsed or rejected the findings of this research. The presentation of this information is in the interest of invoking aerospace community comments on the results and conclusions presented.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - There are currently no direct regulations and few guidelines regarding restraint design for commercial spaceflight vehicles. Operators designing vehicles intended solely for private commercial use, particularly short-duration suborbital flights, have questioned the need for 5-point restraints, instead considering the options of fewer restraints and less stringent application requirements. We sought to identify risks and benefits of alternative restraint designs for the commercial spaceflight industry, particularly for the diverse population of commercial spaceflight participants (SFPs). A systematic review was conducted on currently available information and published literature of human and animal studies as well as industry standards regarding restraint design, common injuries, and patterns of injuries in vehicular trauma, including automobile, aircraft, and spacecraft. Although data are lacking regarding commercial spacecraft or potential mishap forces, extensive studies are available in analogue environments, including motor vehicle crashes and aviation mishaps, which demonstrate variations of restraint design and relative risks and benefits of these systems. These studies demonstrate superiority of harnesses that include shoulder restraint and a negative-G (crotch) belt to limit torso movement. Injury patterns in anthropometrically varied populations, with factors including gender, obesity, and advanced age, demonstrate increased vulnerability to morbidity and mortality in obese and elderly populations and improved outcomes with more rigorous restraint designs. Given the varied population anticipated for commercial SFPs and significant reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with 5-point restraint designs, evidence suggests that the use of a 5-point restraint is most appropriate for commercial spacecraft.
AB - There are currently no direct regulations and few guidelines regarding restraint design for commercial spaceflight vehicles. Operators designing vehicles intended solely for private commercial use, particularly short-duration suborbital flights, have questioned the need for 5-point restraints, instead considering the options of fewer restraints and less stringent application requirements. We sought to identify risks and benefits of alternative restraint designs for the commercial spaceflight industry, particularly for the diverse population of commercial spaceflight participants (SFPs). A systematic review was conducted on currently available information and published literature of human and animal studies as well as industry standards regarding restraint design, common injuries, and patterns of injuries in vehicular trauma, including automobile, aircraft, and spacecraft. Although data are lacking regarding commercial spacecraft or potential mishap forces, extensive studies are available in analogue environments, including motor vehicle crashes and aviation mishaps, which demonstrate variations of restraint design and relative risks and benefits of these systems. These studies demonstrate superiority of harnesses that include shoulder restraint and a negative-G (crotch) belt to limit torso movement. Injury patterns in anthropometrically varied populations, with factors including gender, obesity, and advanced age, demonstrate increased vulnerability to morbidity and mortality in obese and elderly populations and improved outcomes with more rigorous restraint designs. Given the varied population anticipated for commercial SFPs and significant reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with 5-point restraint designs, evidence suggests that the use of a 5-point restraint is most appropriate for commercial spacecraft.
KW - 5-point
KW - belt
KW - crotch belt
KW - harness
KW - negative-G belt
KW - spaceflight participant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063201068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063201068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/space.2018.0026
DO - 10.1089/space.2018.0026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063201068
SN - 2168-0256
VL - 7
SP - 3
EP - 11
JO - New Space
JF - New Space
IS - 1
ER -